Experimental Study on the Shear Strength Between the Steel Bridge Deck and the Asphalt Overlay

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 20160164 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Yao ◽  
F. Li ◽  
J. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Shear Strength ◽  
Bridge Deck ◽  
Steel Bridge ◽  
Asphalt Overlay

scholarly journals An Experimental Study on a Composite Bonding Structure for Steel Bridge Deck Pavements

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Xiaoguang Zheng ◽  
Qi Ren ◽  
Huan Xiong ◽  
Xiaoming Song
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Shear Strength ◽  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Bonding Strength ◽  
Bridge Deck ◽  
Steel Bridge ◽  
Shear Tests ◽  
Bonding Structure ◽  
Asphalt Overlay ◽  
Strength Tests

As one of the major contributors to the early failures of steel bridge deck pavements, the bonding between steel and asphalt overlay has long been a troublesome issue. In this paper, a novel composite bonding structure was introduced consisting of epoxy resin micaceous iron oxide (EMIO) primer, solvent-free epoxy resin waterproof layer, and ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) hot melt pellets. A series of strength tests were performed to study its mechanical properties, including pull-off strength tests, dumbbell tensile tests, lap shear tests, direct tension tests, and 45°-inclined shear tests. The results suggested that the bonding structure exhibited fair bonding strength, tensile strength, and shear strength. Anisotropic behaviour was also observed at high temperatures. For epoxy resin waterproof layer, the loss of bonding strength, tensile strength, and shear strength at 60°C was 70%, 35%, and 39%, respectively. Subsequent pavement performance-oriented tests included five-point bending tests and accelerated wheel tracking tests. The impacts of bonding on fatigue resistance and rutting propagation were studied. It was found that the proposed bonding structure could provide a durable and well-bonded interface and was thus beneficial to prolong the fatigue lives of asphalt overlay. The choice of bonding materials was found irrelevant to the ultimate rutting depth of pavements. But the bonding combination of epoxy resin waterproof and EVA pellets could delay the early-stage rutting propagation.

scholarly journals Shear Fatigue Performance of Epoxy Resin Waterproof Adhesive Layer on Steel Bridge Deck Pavement

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Xu ◽  
Xinpeng Lv ◽  
Chunfeng Ma ◽  
Fengming Liang ◽  
Jiafei Qi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Bridge Deck ◽  
Adhesive Layer ◽  
Fatigue Performance ◽  
Steel Bridge ◽  
Shear Fatigue ◽  
Interlaminar Shear ◽  
Bridge Deck Pavement

In this study, the effects of temperature, shear stress, and coating quantity of waterproof adhesive layer on the shear fatigue performance of a steel bridge deck pavement were investigated. Direct shear fatigue tests of a pavement comprising an epoxy resin waterproof adhesive layer with stone matrix asphalt were conducted at different temperatures, stress levels, and coating quantities. The results show that temperature and stress have significant effects on the shear fatigue life. With increasing temperature and stress, the shear fatigue life of the waterproof adhesive layer decreased gradually. Therefore, for steel bridge deck pavements under high temperatures and heavy loads, the use of asphalt waterproof adhesive layers or pavement layers should be evaluated carefully while limiting the traffic of heavily loaded vehicles. Shear failure occurs at the waterproof adhesive layer–pavement interface and not at the steel–waterproof adhesive layer interface. The shear strength of the epoxy resin waterproof adhesive layer is mainly provided by the bond strength between the waterproof adhesive and pavement mixture as well as the interlocking force between the cured epoxy resin and the bottom interface of uneven pavement mixture. The shear strength increases with the coating quantity of the waterproof adhesive layer; however, after reaching the maximum value, the shear strength becomes stable. In contrast, the interlaminar shear fatigue life increases continuously with the coating quantity of the waterproof adhesive layer. Appropriately increasing the coating quantity is beneficial for improving the resistance of the waterproof adhesive layer to interlaminar shear fatigue failure.

Comparative investigation into field performance of steel bridge deck asphalt overlay systems

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 2755-2764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyang Jia ◽  
Baoshan Huang ◽  
Shangjiang Chen ◽  
Dawei Shi
Keyword(s):  
Bridge Deck ◽  
Field Performance ◽  
Comparative Investigation ◽  
Steel Bridge ◽  
Asphalt Overlay

Developing cold-mixed epoxy resin-based ultra-thin antiskid surface layer for steel bridge deck pavement

2021 ◽  
Vol 291 ◽  
pp. 123366
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Zhendong Qian ◽  
Xijun Shi ◽  
Yuheng Zhang ◽  
Haisheng Ren
Keyword(s):  
Surface Layer ◽  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Bridge Deck ◽  
Steel Bridge ◽  
Bridge Deck Pavement

scholarly journals A Comprehensive Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Approach Developed for Steel Bridge Deck Pavement Schemes

Coatings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 565
Author(s):  
Changbo Liu ◽  
Zhendong Qian ◽  
Yang Liao ◽  
Haisheng Ren
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Life Cycle Cost ◽  
Bridge Deck ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Steel Bridge ◽  
User Cost ◽  
Construction Quality ◽  
Concrete System ◽  
Traffic Conditions ◽  
Bridge Deck Pavement

This study aims to evaluate the economy of a steel bridge deck pavement scheme (SBDPS) using a comprehensive life-cycle cost (LCC) analysis approach. The SBDPS are divided into the “epoxy asphalt concrete system”(EA system) and“ Gussasphalt concrete system”(GA system) according to the difference in the material in the lower layer of the SBDPS. A targeted LCC checklist, including manager cost and user cost was proposed, and a Markov-based approach was applied to establish a life-cycle performance model with clear probability characteristics for SBDPS. Representative traffic conditions were designed using a uniform design method, and the LCC of SBDPS under representative traffic conditions and different credibility (construction quality as a random factor) was compared. The reliability of the LCC analysis approach was verified based on the uncertainty analysis method. Based on an expert-scoring approach, a user cost weight was obtained to ensure it is considered reasonably in the LCC analysis. Compared with the cumulative traffic volume, the cumulative equivalent single axle loads (CESAL) have a closer relationship with the LCC. The GA system has better LCC when the CESAL is less, while the EA system is just the opposite. The breaking point of CESAL for the LCC of the EA system and the GA system is 15 million times. The LCC analysis of SBDPS should consider the influence of random factors such as construction quality. The comprehensive LCC analysis approach in this paper can provide suggestions for bridge-management departments to make a reasonable selection on SBDPS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document