Response to Discussion of “Comparative Evaluation of Geotextile Pore Sizes Using Bubble Point Test and Image Analysis” by Aydilek, A. H., D'Hondt, D., and Holtz, R. D.REFERENCE: Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 30, No. 3, May 2007, pp. 173–181

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 101536
Author(s):  
L. D. Suits ◽  
T. C. Sheahan ◽  
Ahmet H. Aydilek ◽  
Douglas D’Hondt ◽  
Robert D. Holtz
Keyword(s):  
Image Analysis ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Bubble Point ◽  
Pore Sizes ◽  
Point Test ◽  
Geotechnical Testing

Comparative Evaluation of Geotextile Pore Sizes Using Bubble Point Test and Image Analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 100663
Author(s):  
L. D. Suits ◽  
T. C. Sheahan ◽  
AH Aydilek ◽  
D D'Hondt ◽  
RD Holtz
Keyword(s):  
Image Analysis ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Bubble Point ◽  
Pore Sizes ◽  
Point Test

Membrane-filter bubble-point test

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (23) ◽  
pp. 2210-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Newton
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Filter ◽  
Bubble Point ◽  
Point Test ◽  
Filter Bubble

scholarly journals Validation of Sterile Filtration of Intrahospital Sterile Preparations: Bubble Point Test.

1994 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 522-529
Author(s):  
SATOSHI OGAWA ◽  
KAORU CHIBA ◽  
SHIGETAKA AKUTSU ◽  
SHUNICHI INAGAKI
Keyword(s):  
Bubble Point ◽  
Sterile Filtration ◽  
Point Test

Identification of the Critical Pore Sizes in Sintered and Ecaped Aluminium 6XXX Alloy

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bidulská ◽  
T. Kvačkaj ◽  
I. Pokorný ◽  
R. Bidulský ◽  
M. Actis Grande
Keyword(s):  
Image Analysis ◽  
Mathematical Models ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Processing Parameters ◽  
Quantitative Image Analysis ◽  
Statistical Procedure ◽  
Vacuum Furnace ◽  
Pore Sizes ◽  
Quantitative Image ◽  
Compacting Pressure

The main aim of this paper is to investigate, by means of comparison of experimental studies and mathematical models, the evolution of porosity as consequence of pressing, sintering and ECAPping an aluminium based powder (6xxx). After applying the compacting pressure, specimens were dewaxed in a ventilated furnace at 400º for 60 min. Sintering was carried out in a vacuum furnace at 610ºC for 30 min. The specimens were then ECAPed for 1 pass. The 2-dimensional quantitative image analysis was carried out by means of SEM and OM for the evaluation of the aforementioned characteristics. Results show the effect of processing parameters on the fracture/microstructure behaviour of the studied aluminium PM alloy. Quantitative image analysis, as well as fractographic interpretation and microstructure identification of weak sites in the studied aluminium PM alloy, provide a reliable and reproducible statistical procedure for the identification of the critical pore sizes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document