scholarly journals Least eigenvalue of the connected graphs whose complements are cacti

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1319-1331
Author(s):  
Haiying Wang ◽  
Muhammad Javaid ◽  
Sana Akram ◽  
Muhammad Jamal ◽  
Shaohui Wang

Abstract Suppose that Γ is a graph of order n and A(Γ) = [ai,j] is its adjacency matrix such that ai,j is equal to 1 if vi is adjacent to vj and ai,j is zero otherwise, where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n. In a family of graphs, a graph is called minimizing if the least eigenvalue of its adjacency matrix is minimum in the set of the least eigenvalues of all the graphs. Petrović et al. [On the least eigenvalue of cacti, Linear Algebra Appl., 2011, 435, 2357-2364] characterized a minimizing graph in the family of all cacti such that the complement of this minimizing graph is disconnected. In this paper, we characterize the minimizing graphs G ∈ $\begin{array}{} {\it\Omega}^c_n \end{array}$, i.e. $$\begin{array}{} \displaystyle \lambda_{min}(G)\leq\lambda_{min}(C^c) \end{array}$$ for each Cc ∈ $\begin{array}{} {\it\Omega}^c_n \end{array}$, where $\begin{array}{} {\it\Omega}^c_n \end{array}$ is a collection of connected graphs such that the complement of each graph of order n is a cactus with the condition that either its each block is only an edge or it has at least one block which is an edge and at least one block which is a cycle.

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang Zhou ◽  
Lizhu Sun ◽  
Hongmei Yao ◽  
Changjiang Bu

Let L (resp. L+) be the set of connected graphs with least adjacency eigenvalue at least -2 (resp. larger than -2). The nullity of a graph G, denoted by ?(G), is the multiplicity of zero as an eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix of G. In this paper, we give the nullity set of L+ and an upper bound on the nullity of exceptional graphs. An expression for the nullity of generalized line graphs is given. For G ? L, if ?(G) is sufficiently large, then G is a proper generalized line graph (G is not a line graph).


2013 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 1350017 ◽  
Author(s):  
XUE DU ◽  
LINGSHENG SHI

The independence number of a graph is defined as the maximum size of a set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices and the spectral radius is defined as the maximum eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix of the graph. Xu et al. in [The minimum spectral radius of graphs with a given independence number, Linear Algebra and its Applications431 (2009) 937–945] determined the connected graphs of order n with independence number [Formula: see text] which minimize the spectral radius. In this paper, we show that the graph obtained from a path of order α by blowing up each vertex to a clique of order k minimizes the spectral radius among all connected graphs of order kα with independence number α for α = 3, 4 and conjecture that this is true for all α ∈ ℕ.


2018 ◽  
Vol 555 ◽  
pp. 434-436
Author(s):  
Ji-Ming Guo ◽  
Zhi-Wen Wang ◽  
Jianxi Li ◽  
Wai Chee Shiu ◽  
Pan-Pan Tong

Author(s):  
A Mohammad ◽  
R A Khan ◽  
V P Agrawal

Development of the methods for generating distinct mechanisms derived from a given family of kinematic chains has been persued by a number of researchers in the past, as the distinct kinematic structures provide distinct performance characteristics. A new method is proposed to identify the distinct mechanisms derived from a given kinematic chain in this paper. Kinematic chains and their derived mechanisms are represented in the form of an extended adjacency matrix [EA] using the graph theoretic approach. Two structural invariants derived from the eigen spectrum of the [EA] matrix are the sum of absolute eigen values EA∑ and maximum absolute eigen value EAmax. These invariants are used as the composite identification number of a kinematic chain and mechanism and are tested to identify the all-distinct mechanisms derived from the family of 1-F kinematic chains up to 10 links. The identification of distinct kinematic chains and their mechanisms is necessary to select the best possible mechanism for the specified task at the conceptual stage of design.


2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1431-1448
Author(s):  
Ansderson Fernandes Novanta ◽  
Carla Silva Oliveira ◽  
Leonardo de Lima

Let G be a graph on n vertices. The Laplacian matrix of G, denoted by L(G), is defined as L(G) = D(G) −A(G), where A(G) is the adjacency matrix of G and D(G) is the diagonal matrix of the vertex degrees of G. A graph G is said to be L-integral if all eigenvalues of the matrix L(G) are integers. In this paper, we characterize all Lintegral non-bipartite graphs among all connected graphs with at most two vertices of degree larger than or equal to three.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Bernal-González

Abstract In this paper, a criterion for the existence of large linear algebras consisting, except for zero, of one-to-one operators on an infinite dimensional Banach space is provided. As a consequence, it is shown that every separable infinite dimensional Banach space supports a commutative infinitely generated free linear algebra of operators all of whose nonzero members are one-to-one. In certain cases, the assertion holds for nonseparable Banach spaces.


2011 ◽  
Vol 435 (9) ◽  
pp. 2303-2313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miroslav Petrović ◽  
Tatjana Aleksić ◽  
Slobodan Simić

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Mark Debono ◽  
Josef Lauri ◽  
Irene Sciriha

There is an age-old question in all branches of network analysis. What makes an actor in a network important, courted, or sought? Both Crossley and Bonacich contend that rather than its intrinsic wealth or value, an actor’s status lies in the structures of its interactions with other actors. Since pairwise relation data in a network can be stored in a two-dimensional array or matrix, graph theory and linear algebra lend themselves as great tools to gauge the centrality (interpreted as importance, power, or popularity, depending on the purpose of the network) of each actor. We express known and new centralities in terms of only two matrices associated with the network. We show that derivations of these expressions can be handled exclusively through the main eigenvectors (not orthogonal to the all-one vector) associated with the adjacency matrix. We also propose a centrality vector (SWIPD) which is a linear combination of the square, walk, power, and degree centrality vectors with weightings of the various centralities depending on the purpose of the network. By comparing actors’ scores for various weightings, a clear understanding of which actors are most central is obtained. Moreover, for threshold networks, the (SWIPD) measure turns out to be independent of the weightings.


10.37236/434 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxi Li ◽  
Ji-Ming Guo ◽  
Wai Chee Shiu

The algebraic connectivity of a graph $G$ is the second smallest eigenvalue of its Laplacian matrix. Let $\mathscr{B}_n$ be the set of all bicyclic graphs of order $n$. In this paper, we determine the last four bicyclic graphs (according to their smallest algebraic connectivities) among all graphs in $\mathscr{B}_n$ when $n\geq 13$. This result, together with our previous results on trees and unicyclic graphs, can be used to further determine the last sixteen graphs among all connected graphs of order $n$. This extends the results of Shao et al. [The ordering of trees and connected graphs by their algebraic connectivity, Linear Algebra Appl. 428 (2008) 1421-1438].


10.37236/6190 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuya Chiba ◽  
Jun Fujisawa ◽  
Michitaka Furuya ◽  
Hironobu Ikarashi

Let $\mathcal{H}$ be a family of connected graphs. A graph $G$ is said to be $\mathcal{H}$-free if $G$ does not contain any members of $\mathcal{H}$ as an induced subgraph. Let $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{H})$ be the family of connected $\mathcal{H}$-free graphs. In this context, the members of $\mathcal{H}$ are called forbidden subgraphs.In this paper, we focus on two pairs of forbidden subgraphs containing a common graph, and compare the classes of graphs satisfying each of the two forbidden subgraph conditions. Our main result is the following: Let $H_{1},H_{2},H_{3}$ be connected graphs of order at least three, and suppose that $H_{1}$ is twin-less. If the symmetric difference of $\mathcal{F}(\{H_{1},H_{2}\})$ and $\mathcal{F}(\{H_{1},H_{3}\})$ is finite and the tuple $(H_{1};H_{2},H_{3})$ is non-trivial in a sense, then $H_{2}$ and $H_{3}$ are obtained from the same vertex-transitive graph by successively replacing a vertex with a clique and joining the neighbors of the original vertex and the clique. Furthermore, we refine a result in [Combin. Probab. Comput. 22 (2013) 733–748] concerning forbidden pairs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document