Examination of the reliability of an inertial sensor-based gait analysis system

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Orlowski ◽  
Falko Eckardt ◽  
Fabian Herold ◽  
Norman Aye ◽  
Jürgen Edelmann-Nusser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Inertial Sensor ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
Almost All

AbstractGait analysis is an important and useful part of the daily therapeutic routine. InvestiGAIT, an inertial sensor-based system, was developed for using in different research projects with a changing number and position of sensors and because commercial systems do not capture the motion of the upper body. The current study is designed to evaluate the reliability of InvestiGAIT consisting of four off-the-shelf inertial sensors and in-house capturing and analysis software. Besides the determination of standard gait parameters, the motion of the upper body (pelvis and spine) can be investigated. Kinematic data of 25 healthy individuals (age: 25.6±3.3 years) were collected using a test-retest design with 1 week between measurement sessions. We calculated different parameters for absolute [e.g. limits of agreement (LoA)] and relative reliability [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)]. Our results show excellent ICC values for most of the gait parameters. Midswing height (MH), height difference (HD) of initial contact (IC) and terminal contact (TC) and stride length (SL) are the gait parameters, which did not exhibit acceptable values representing absolute reliability. Moreover, the parameters derived from the motion of the upper body (pelvis and spine) show excellent ICC values or high correlations. Our results indicate that InvestiGAIT is suitable for reliable measurement of almost all the considered gait parameters.

scholarly journals Test-Retest, Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability for Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Using SANE (an eaSy gAit aNalysis systEm) as Measuring Instrument

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 5781
Author(s):  
Betsy D. M. Chaparro-Rico ◽  
Daniele Cafolla
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Measuring Instrument ◽  
Depth Sensor ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Smallest Detectable Change ◽  
Spatiotemporal Parameters ◽  
Analysis System

Studies have demonstrated the validity of Kinect-based systems to measure spatiotemporal parameters of gait. However, few studies have addressed test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for spatiotemporal gait parameters. This study aims to assess test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of SANE (eaSy gAit aNalysis system) as a measuring instrument for spatiotemporal gait parameters. SANE comprises a depth sensor and a software that automatically estimates spatiotemporal gait parameters using distances between ankles without the need to manually indicate where each gait cycle begins and ends. Gait analysis was conducted by 2 evaluators for 12 healthy subjects during 4 sessions. The reliability was evaluated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). In addition, the Standard Error of the Measurement (SEM), and Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) was calculated. SANE showed from an acceptable to an excellent test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability; test-retest reliability ranged from 0.62 to 0.81, inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.70 to 0.95 and intra-rater ranged from 0.74 to 0.92. The subject behavior had a greater effect on the reliability of SANE than the evaluator performance. The reliability values of SANE were comparable with other similar studies. SANE, as a feasible and markerless system, has large potential for assessing spatiotemporal gait parameters.

scholarly journals Foot-Worn Inertial Sensors Are Reliable to Assess Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Axial Spondyloarthritis under Single and Dual Task Walking in Axial Spondyloarthritis

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 6453
Author(s):  
Julie Soulard ◽  
Jacques Vaillant ◽  
Romain Balaguier ◽  
Athan Baillet ◽  
Philippe Gaudin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dual Task ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Relative Reliability ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Task Conditions ◽  
Absolute Reliability

The aim of this study was (1) to evaluate the relative and absolute reliability of gait parameters during walking in single- and dual-task conditions in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), (2) to evaluate the absolute and relative reliability of dual task effects (DTE) parameters, and (3) to determine the number of trials required to ensure reliable gait assessment, in patients with axSpA. Twenty patients with axSpa performed a 10-m walk test in single- and dual-task conditions, three times for each condition. Spatiotemporal, symmetry, and DTE gait parameters were calculated from foot-worn inertial sensors. The relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients-ICC) and absolute reliability (standard error of measurement-SEM and minimum detectable change-MDC) were calculated for these parameters in each condition. Spatiotemporal gait parameters showed good to excellent reliability in both conditions (0.59 < ICC < 0.90). The reliability of symmetry and DTE parameters was low. ICC, SEM, and MDC were better when using the mean of the second and the third trials. Spatiotemporal gait parameters obtained from foot-worn inertial sensors assessed in patients with axSpA in single- and dual-task conditions are reliable. However, symmetry and DTE parameters seem less reliable and need to be interpreted with caution. Finally, better reliability of gait parameters was found when using the mean of the 2nd and the 3rd trials.

scholarly journals Towards Wearable-Inertial-Sensor-Based Gait Posture Evaluation for Subjects with Unbalanced Gaits

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
SEN QIU ◽  
Huihui Wang ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
Hongyu Zhao ◽  
Zhelong Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Inertial Sensor ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
3D Models ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Sensor Nodes ◽  
Human Gait ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Analysis System

Human gait reflects health condition and is widely adopted as a diagnostic basisin clinical practice. This research adopts compact inertial sensor nodes to monitor the functionof human lower limbs, which implies the most fundamental locomotion ability. The proposedwearable gait analysis system captures limb motion and reconstructs 3D models with high accuracy.It can output the kinematic parameters of joint flexion and extension, as well as the displacementdata of human limbs. The experimental results provide strong support for quick access to accuratehuman gait data. This paper aims to provide a clue for how to learn more about gait postureand how wearable gait analysis can enhance clinical outcomes. With an ever-expanding gait database,it is possible to help physiotherapists to quickly discover the causes of abnormal gaits, sports injuryrisks, and chronic pain, and provides guidance for arranging personalized rehabilitation programsfor patients. The proposed framework may eventually become a useful tool for continually monitoringspatio-temporal gait parameters and decision-making in an ambulatory environment.

scholarly journals Comprehensive Validation of a Wearable Foot Sensor System for Estimating Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters by Simultaneous Three-Dimensional Optical Motion Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Homan ◽  
Keizo Yamamoto ◽  
Ken Kadoya ◽  
Naoki Ishida ◽  
Norimasa Iwasaki
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Scientific Basis ◽  
The Body ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Optical Motion ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
Two Parameters

Abstract Background Use of a wearable gait analysis system (WGAS) is becoming common when conducting gait analysis studies due to its versatility. At the same time, its versatility raises a concern about its accuracy, because its calculations rely on assumptions embedded in its algorithms. The purpose of the present study was to validate all spatiotemporal gait parameters calculated by the WGAS by comparison with simultaneous measurements taken with an optical motion capture system (OMCS). Methods Ten young healthy volunteers wore two inertial sensors of the commercially available WGAS, Physilog®, on their feet and 23 markers for the OMCS on the lower part of the body. The participants performed at least three sets of 10-m walk tests at their self-paced speed in the laboratory equipped with 12 high-speed digital cameras with embedded force plates. To measure repeatability, all participants returned for a second day of testing within two weeks. Results All gait parameters calculated by the WGAS had a significant correlation with the ones determined by the OMCS. Bland and Altman analysis showed that the between-device agreement for all gait parameters was within clinically acceptable limits. The validity of the gait parameters generated by the WGAS was found to be excellent except for two parameters, swing width and maximal heel clearance. The repeatability of the WGAS was excellent when measured between sessions. Conclusion The present study showed that spatiotemporal gait parameters estimated by the WGAS were reasonably accurate and repeatable in healthy young adults, providing a scientific basis for applying this system to clinical studies.

scholarly journals A Novel Tool for Gait Analysis: Validation Study of the Smart Insole PODOSmart®

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 5972
Author(s):  
Efthymios Ziagkas ◽  
Andreas Loukovitis ◽  
Dimitrios Xypolias Zekakos ◽  
Thomas Duc-Phu Chau ◽  
Alexandros Petrelis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
System Validation ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Stride Duration ◽  
Smart Insole

The new smart insole PODOSmart®, is introduced as a new tool for gait analysis against high cost laboratory based equipment. PODOSmart® system measures walking profile and gait variables in real life conditions. PODOSmart® insoles consists of wireless sensors, can be fitted into any shoe and offer the ability to measure spatial, temporal, and kinematic gait parameters. The intelligent insoles feature several sensors that detect and capture foot movements and a microprocessor that calculates gait related biomechanical data. Gait analysis results are presented in PODOSmart® platform. This study aims to present the characteristics of this tool and to validate it comparing with a stereophotogrammetry-based system. Validation was performed by gait analysis for eleven healthy individuals on a six-meters walkway using both PODOSmart® and Vicon system. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for gait parameters. ICC for the validation ranged from 0.313 to 0.990 in gait parameters. The highest ICC was observed in cadence, circumduction, walking speed, stride length and stride duration. PODOSmart® is a valid tool for gait analysis compared to the gold standard Vicon. As PODOSmart®, is a portable gait analysis tool with an affordable cost it can be a useful novel tool for gait analysis in healthy and pathological population.

scholarly journals Concurrent validity and repeatability of inertial sensor gait analysis system for the measurement of gait parameters of young healthy adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1484600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annukka Myllymäki ◽  
Eliisa Löyttyniemi ◽  
Maria Kaunismäki ◽  
Maiju Pesonen ◽  
Airi Oksanen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Inertial Sensor ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Analysis System

scholarly journals A Deep Learning Approach for Foot Trajectory Estimation in Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 7517
Author(s):  
Vânia Guimarães ◽  
Inês Sousa ◽  
Miguel Velhote Correia
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Inertial Sensor ◽  
Sensor Data ◽  
Coordinate Frame ◽  
Complete Evaluation ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Deep Recurrent Neural Network ◽  
Optical Motion ◽  
Frame Transformation

Gait performance is an important marker of motor and cognitive decline in older adults. An instrumented gait analysis resorting to inertial sensors allows the complete evaluation of spatiotemporal gait parameters, offering an alternative to laboratory-based assessments. To estimate gait parameters, foot trajectories are typically obtained by integrating acceleration two times. However, to deal with cumulative integration errors, additional error handling strategies are required. In this study, we propose an alternative approach based on a deep recurrent neural network to estimate heel and toe trajectories. We propose a coordinate frame transformation for stride trajectories that eliminates the dependency from previous strides and external inputs. Predicted trajectories are used to estimate an extensive set of spatiotemporal gait parameters. We evaluate the results in a dataset comprising foot-worn inertial sensor data acquired from a group of young adults, using an optical motion capture system as a reference. Heel and toe trajectories are predicted with low errors, in line with reference trajectories. A good agreement is also achieved between the reference and estimated gait parameters, in particular when turning strides are excluded from the analysis. The performance of the method is shown to be robust to imperfect sensor-foot alignment conditions.

scholarly journals Validity of Inertial Sensors for Assessing Balance Kinematics and Mobility during Treadmill-Based Perturbation and Dance Training

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 3065
Author(s):  
Ernest Kwesi Ofori ◽  
Shuaijie Wang ◽  
Tanvi Bhatt
Keyword(s):  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Human Motion ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Dance Training ◽  
Silver Standard ◽  
Mean Square Errors ◽  
Reactive Balance

Inertial sensors (IS) enable the kinematic analysis of human motion with fewer logistical limitations than the silver standard optoelectronic motion capture (MOCAP) system. However, there are no data on the validity of IS for perturbation training and during the performance of dance. The aim of this present study was to determine the concurrent validity of IS in the analysis of kinematic data during slip and trip-like perturbations and during the performance of dance. Seven IS and the MOCAP system were simultaneously used to capture the reactive response and dance movements of fifteen healthy young participants (Age: 18–35 years). Bland Altman (BA) plots, root mean square errors (RMSE), Pearson’s correlation coefficients (R), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to compare kinematic variables of interest between the two systems for absolute equivalency and accuracy. Limits of agreements (LOA) of the BA plots ranged from −0.23 to 0.56 and −0.21 to 0.43 for slip and trip stability variables, respectively. The RMSE for slip and trip stabilities were from 0.11 to 0.20 and 0.11 to 0.16, respectively. For the joint mobility in dance, LOA varied from −6.98–18.54, while RMSE ranged from 1.90 to 13.06. Comparison of IS and optoelectronic MOCAP system for reactive balance and body segmental kinematics revealed that R varied from 0.59 to 0.81 and from 0.47 to 0.85 while ICC was from 0.50 to 0.72 and 0.45 to 0.84 respectively for slip–trip perturbations and dance. Results of moderate to high concurrent validity of IS and MOCAP systems. These results were consistent with results from similar studies. This suggests that IS are valid tools to quantitatively analyze reactive balance and mobility kinematics during slip–trip perturbation and the performance of dance at any location outside, including the laboratory, clinical and home settings.

Validation of wearable inertial sensor-based gait analysis system for measurement of spatiotemporal parameters and lower extremity joint kinematics in sagittal plane

2022 ◽  
pp. 095441192110729
Author(s):  
Gunjan Patel ◽  
Rajani Mullerpatan ◽  
Bela Agarwal ◽  
Triveni Shetty ◽  
Rajdeep Ojha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Motion Capture ◽  
Inertial Sensor ◽  
Joint Kinematics ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Motion Capture System ◽  
Spatiotemporal Parameters ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
Motion Capture Systems

Wearable inertial sensor-based motion analysis systems are promising alternatives to standard camera-based motion capture systems for the measurement of gait parameters and joint kinematics. These wearable sensors, unlike camera-based gold standard systems, find usefulness in outdoor natural environment along with confined indoor laboratory-based environment due to miniature size and wireless data transmission. This study reports validation of our developed (i-Sens) wearable motion analysis system against standard motion capture system. Gait analysis was performed at self-selected speed on non-disabled volunteers in indoor ( n = 15) and outdoor ( n = 8) environments. Two i-Sens units were placed at the level of knee and hip along with passive markers (for indoor study only) for simultaneous 3D motion capture using a motion capture system. Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was computed for spatiotemporal parameters from the i-Sens system versus the motion capture system as a true reference. Mean and standard deviation of kinematic data for a gait cycle were plotted for both systems against normative data. Joint kinematics data were analyzed to compute the root mean squared error (RMSE) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Kinematic plots indicate a high degree of accuracy of the i-Sens system with the reference system. Excellent positive correlation was observed between the two systems in terms of hip and knee joint angles (Indoor: hip 3.98° ± 1.03°, knee 6.48° ± 1.91°, Outdoor: hip 3.94° ± 0.78°, knee 5.82° ± 0.99°) with low RMSE. Reliability characteristics (defined using standard statistical thresholds of MAPE) of stride length, cadence, walking speed in both outdoor and indoor environment were well within the “Good” category. The i-Sens system has emerged as a potentially cost-effective, valid, accurate, and reliable alternative to expensive, standard motion capture systems for gait analysis. Further clinical trials using the i-Sens system are warranted on participants across different age groups.

scholarly journals Assessing the concurrent validity of a gait analysis system integrated into a smart walker in older adults with gait impairments

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1682-1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Werner ◽  
Georgia Chalvatzaki ◽  
Xanthi S Papageorgiou ◽  
Costas S Tzafestas ◽  
Jürgen M Bauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Gait Speed ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Stride Length ◽  
Gait Parameters ◽  
Stance Time ◽  
Absolute Agreement ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
Smart Walker ◽  
Gait Impairments

Objective: To assess the concurrent validity of a smart walker–integrated gait analysis system with the GAITRite® system for measuring spatiotemporal gait parameters in potential users of the smart walker. Design: Criterion standard validation study. Setting: Research laboratory in a geriatric hospital. Participants: Twenty-five older adults (⩾65 years) with gait impairments (habitual rollator use and/or gait speed <0.6 m/s) and no severe cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination ⩾17). Main measures: Stride, swing and stance time; stride length; and gait speed were simultaneously recorded using the smart walker–integrated gait analysis system and the GAITRite system while participants walked along a 7.8-m walkway with the smart walker. Concurrent criterion-related validity was assessed using the Bland–Altman method, percentage errors (acceptable if <30%), and intraclass correlation coefficients for consistency (ICC3,1) and absolute agreement (ICC2,1). Results: Bias for stride, swing and stance time ranged from −0.04 to 0.04 seconds, with acceptable percentage errors (8.7%–23.0%). Stride length and gait speed showed higher bias (meanbias (SD) = 0.20 (0.11) m; 0.19 (0.13) m/s) and not acceptable percentage errors (31.3%–42.3%). Limits of agreement were considerably narrower for temporal than for spatial-related gait parameters. All gait parameters showed good-to-excellent consistency (ICC3,1 = 0.72–0.97). Absolute agreement was good-to-excellent for temporal (ICC2,1 = 0.72–0.97) but only poor-to-fair for spatial-related gait parameters (ICC2,1 = 0.37–0.52). Conclusion: The smart walker–integrated gait analysis system has good concurrent validity with the GAITRite system for measuring temporal but not spatial-related gait parameters in potential end-users of the smart walker. Stride length and gait speed can be measured with good consistency, but with only limited absolute accuracy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document