scholarly journals Comparing computer game and traditional lecture using experience ratings from high and low achieving students

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Grimley ◽  
Richard Green ◽  
Trond Nilsen ◽  
David Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Computer Games ◽  
Computer Game ◽  
High Achievers ◽  
Student Experiences ◽  
Instructional Tools ◽  
Traditional Group ◽  
Course Content ◽  
High Achieving Students ◽  
Low Achieving Students ◽  
High Achieving

<span>Computer games are purported to be effective instructional tools that enhance motivation and improve engagement. The aim of this study was to investigate how tertiary student experiences change when instruction was computer game based compared to lecture based, and whether experiences differed between high and low achieving students. Participants consisted two cohorts enrolled in a first year university course (Cohort 1, traditional: male=42, female=17; Cohort 2, computer game: male=42, female=7). Cohort 1 experienced course content as traditional lectures, Cohort 2 experienced course content embedded within a computer game. Csikszentmihalyi's experience sampling method was used to sample experiences of students for each cohort during instruction. Results showed that the computer game group were more challenged and valued the activity more than the traditional group, but were inclined to wish they were doing something else. High achieving students during game mode showed greater concentration but found it harder to concentrate and found game mode more sociable and lecture mode more boring. High achievers perceived greater success for lecture mode and found lectures more satisfying. Individual profiles of high and low achieving students for each mode indicated that games afforded better experiences for low achieving students but poorer experiences for high achieving students.</span>

High Achieving Students and Moral Judgment

1993 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darcia Narváez
Keyword(s):  
Moral Judgment ◽  
High Achievers ◽  
Alternative View ◽  
General Factor ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
High Achieving Students ◽  
High Achieving ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Reporting Data

Research exploring the relationship of intellectual aptitude to moral judgment has indicated that, as a group, those with a high intellectual aptitude score significantly above their age peers on measures of moral judgment. These data support the contention that intelligence is a “general factor” that cuts across domains. Some theorists have advocated an alternative view, that intelligence is domain specific. In looking at high achievers, the current study offers support for both views by reporting data that indicate a dependence of moral judgment precocity upon high intellectual achievement. As a group, the high achieving students scored higher on the Defining Issues Test's Principled score. However, there was a wide variation in scores among the high achievers, indicating that apparent intellectual aptitude was not enough for high scores in moral judgment. This variance, along with the fact that no low achiever received an unusually high score, supports the “independent domains” hypothesis of intelligence.

scholarly journals Excessive Boredom Among Adolescents: A Comparison Between Low and High Achievers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel M. Schwartze ◽  
Anne C. Frenzel ◽  
Thomas Goetz ◽  
Anton Karl Georg Marx ◽  
Corinna Reck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Self Report ◽  
High Achievers ◽  
Personality Profiles ◽  
Achievement Level ◽  
School Students ◽  
Expressive Suppression ◽  
Social And Emotional ◽  
High Achieving Students ◽  
High Achieving

Existing research shows that high scholastic boredom is correlated with a range of undesirable behaviors and personality traits and that the main antecedents of boredom are being over- or under-challenged. No study to date, though, seems to have systematically compared students who are highly bored and low-achieving (thus, likely over-challenged) with students who are highly bored and high-achieving (thus, likely under-challenged). Hence, merely knowing that students are highly bored might be insufficient for drawing conclusions about students’ behavior and personality, without taking their achievement level into account. We, therefore, investigated if low- versus high-achieving students who experience strong mathematics boredom show different behaviors and personality traits. The sample consisted of 1,404 German secondary school students (fifth to 10th grade, mean age 12.83 years, 52% female). We used self-report instruments to assess boredom in mathematics, behavior (social and emotional problems, positive/negative affect, emotion regulation), and personality traits (neuroticism and conscientiousness). In comparing highly bored students (more than one SD above M, n = 258) who were low versus high achievers (as indicated by the math grade, n = 125 / n = 119), results showed that there were no mean level differences across those groups for the behavior and personality trait constructs, with only three exceptions: conduct problems and expressive suppression (higher for low achievers) and positive affect (higher for high achievers). In conclusion, our results suggest that high boredom can occur in both low and high achieving students and that bored low- and high-achievers show largely similar behaviors and personality profiles.

scholarly journals Scholars on the sidelines : a phenomenological study of high-achieving elementary students in southwest Missouri

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Kerri Cox
Keyword(s):  
Elementary Students ◽  
Phenomenological Study ◽  
Academic Experiences ◽  
Suburban Schools ◽  
High Achievers ◽  
Phenomenological Inquiry ◽  
Academic Challenges ◽  
High Achieving Students ◽  
High Achieving ◽  
Classroom Structures

High-achieving students are those who enter the classroom ready and able to learn. They demonstrate their abilities by earning high grades in their coursework and by receiving high scores on standardized tests. The purpose of this phenomenological inquiry was to articulate the lived experiences of high-achieving elementary students in suburban schools in southwest Missouri. How would high-achieving elementary students, their parents, and their classroom teachers describe the academic experiences of high-achieving elementary students in suburban schools in southwest Missouri? Specific research probes looked at the degree to which these students received differentiated instruction and sought to uncover the classroom experiences and academic structures that best support and most hinder these students? growth. The findings show that students have limited differentiated opportunities. In speaking to parents, students, and teachers, the following classroom structures and academic structures emerged as those that most hinder learning: (a) mixed-ability classrooms, (b) a focus on standardization, (c) teaching to the middle, and (d) personality clashes with teachers. The following classroom structures and experiences emerged from the data as those that support high-achieving students: (a) pursuing their passions in and out of the classroom; (b) supportive teachers; and (c) confronting and conquering academic challenges. Implications from this study could provide researchers, educators, and administrators more insight into the needs of high-achievers and recommendations for supporting these students in the classroom.

scholarly journals STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION IN ENGLISH SUBJECT USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN PRIMARY SCHOOL

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 128-140
Author(s):  
Ummi Salehah Hamzah ◽  
Nurfaradilla Mohamad Nasri
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Primary School ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
High Achieving Students ◽  
Low Achieving Students ◽  
High Achieving

Cooperative learning is one of the PAK-21 learning methods that emphasize student-centered learning. This method makes students work together in seeking knowledge which in turn makes the learning process more interesting. Thus, the Ministry of Education Malaysia has strived to improve student development by encouraging the use of cooperative learning methods during the teaching and learning process. The objectives of the study are to identify the differences in high-achieving and low-achieving students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of cooperative learning, to identify high and low-achieving students' perceptions of the effectiveness of cooperative learning and to identify high-achieving and motivated learning motivations in cooperative learning in English primary school. A total of 227 Year 5 students from 3 schools were randomly selected using the survey method. The results show that there is no significant difference in the perception of high-achieving students and low-achieving students on the effectiveness of cooperative learning. Meanwhile, the average mean for the level of perception of high-achieving and low-achieving students on the effectiveness of primary school cooperative learning is high at 4,076 and the mean for the level of learning motivation of high-achieving and low-achieving students on the effectiveness of cooperative learning in primary school English is also high at 3.998. Cooperative learning has a positive impact on the learning motivation and perception of the next high-achieving students and low-achieving students can work together and establish good relationships during the teaching and learning process.

Working Memory Load and Reminder Effect on Event-Based Prospective Memory of High- and Low-Achieving Students in Math

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 602-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youzhen Chen ◽  
Rong Lian ◽  
Lixian Yang ◽  
Jianrong Liu ◽  
Yingfang Meng
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Prospective Memory ◽  
Memory Load ◽  
Working Memory Load ◽  
High Achieving Students ◽  
Low Achieving Students ◽  
Subject Factor ◽  
High Achieving ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Event Based

The effects of working memory (WM) demand and reminders on an event-based prospective memory (PM) task were compared between students with low and high achievement in math. WM load (1- and 2-back tasks) was manipulated as a within-subject factor and reminder (with or without reminder) as a between-subject factor. Results showed that high-achieving students outperformed low-achieving students on all PM and n-back tasks. Use of a reminder improved PM performance and thus reduced prospective interference; the performance of ongoing tasks also improved for all students. Both PM and n-back performances in low WM load were better than in high WM load. High WM load had more influence on low-achieving students than on high-achieving students. Results suggest that low-achieving students in math were weak at PM and influenced more by high WM load. Thus, it is important to train these students to set up an obvious reminder for their PM and improve their WM.

scholarly journals Calibración del resultado de una prueba escrita en estudiantes de ciencias de secundaria: el efecto del sexo

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-344
Author(s):  
Diego Ardura ◽  
Arturo Galán
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Low Achievers ◽  
General Tendency ◽  
Use Of Self ◽  
School Students ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
High Achieving Students ◽  
Low Achieving Students ◽  
High Achieving

Durante las últimas décadas se han encontrado importantes diferencias por sexo en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de las disciplinas científicas. Por otro lado, la autoevaluación por parte de los estudiantes supone un aspecto fundamental en el ciclo de autorregulación del aprendizaje y, por tanto, en su rendimiento. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la metacognición de los estudiantes de secundaria y, en particular, el efecto del sexo en las mismas. Para ello se ha medido la calibración de 507 estudiantes. Nuestros análisis muestran que las chicas calibran mejor su nota que los chicos a pesar de que estos últimos muestran más seguridad en sus juicios. Se ha encontrado una tendencia de ambos sexos a la sobreestimación de sus calificaciones en una prueba escrita. Por otro lado, los estudiantes con alto rendimiento son más precisos y tienden a sobrevalorar sus actuaciones. En cambio, los de rendimiento bajo son más imprecisos y tienden a subestimar sus calificaciones en la prueba. Aunque este efecto se observa en ambos sexos, su tamaño es superior en el caso de las chicas. En vista de los resultados, los estudiantes de rendimiento alto utilizan con más eficacia la retroalimentación que generan durante la prueba que los de rendimiento bajo. Las diferencias por sexo podrían tener su origen en las diferentes actitudes y motivaciones de los chicos y las chicas hacia la ciencia. During the last decades, important sex differences have been found in the context of science education. Besides, self-assessment is crucial in the cycle of self-regulated learning and, consequently, in students’ performance. The main goal of the present investigation is to analyze secondary school students’ metacognition and, in particular, the effect of gender. To this aim, a sample of 507 students took part in our study. Our analyses show that girls are better calibrated than boys in spite of being the latter more confident in their predictions. A general tendency towards overestimations has been found for both sexes. Moreover, high-achieving students tend to be more precise and underestimate their performance and low-achieving students tend to be less precise and overestimate their grade in the test. Although this effect was found in both sexes, the size effect was large in the case of girls. In light of our results, high-achieving students make a better use of self-generated feedback than low-achievers. Sex differences in calibration could be explained by the different attitudes and motivations of boys and girls towards science.

Ratings by High- and Low-Achieving Students of Teaching Qualities of College Professors

1976 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 939-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darshan Sachdeva
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Low Achievers ◽  
College Professors ◽  
Teaching Role ◽  
High Achieving Students ◽  
Low Achieving Students ◽  
High Achieving ◽  
Independent Thinking

Qualities of college professors on 10 statements as viewed by 270 high-achieving and 210 low-achieving students were described. Most of the students attribute greatest importance to the teaching role of their professors. The high-achieving students would like their professors to guide them toward independent thinking whereas the low achievers seem to be more concerned with the course organization, presentation of subject matter, and the grading procedures of their professors.

scholarly journals Academic performance of K-12 students in an online-learning environment for mathematics increased during the shutdown of schools in wake of the COVID-19 pandemic

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255629
Author(s):  
Markus Wolfgang Hermann Spitzer ◽  
Sebastian Musslick
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
School Closures ◽  
High Achieving Students ◽  
Low Achieving Students ◽  
Rapid Spread ◽  
High Achieving ◽  
Learning Software ◽  
Education Gap ◽  
K 12

The shutdown of schools in response to the rapid spread of COVID-19 poses risks to the education of young children, including a widening education gap. In the present article, we investigate how school closures in 2020 influenced the performance of German students in a curriculum-based online learning software for mathematics. We analyzed data from more than 2,500 K-12 students who computed over 124,000 mathematical problem sets before and during the shutdown, and found that students’ performance increased during the shutdown of schools in 2020 relative to the year before. Our analyses also revealed that low-achieving students showed greater improvements in performance than high-achieving students, suggesting a narrowing gap in performance between low- and high-achieving students. We conclude that online learning environments may be effective in preventing educational losses associated with current and future shutdowns of schools.

scholarly journals Excessive boredom among adolescents: A comparison between low and high achievers

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0241671
Author(s):  
Manuel M. Schwartze ◽  
Anne C. Frenzel ◽  
Thomas Goetz ◽  
Anton K. G. Marx ◽  
Corinna Reck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Self Report ◽  
High Achievers ◽  
Personality Profiles ◽  
Achievement Level ◽  
School Students ◽  
Expressive Suppression ◽  
Personality Variables ◽  
Social And Emotional ◽  
High Achieving Students ◽  
High Achieving

Existing research shows that high achievement boredom is correlated with a range of undesirable behavioral and personality variables and that the main antecedents of boredom are being over- or under-challenged. However, merely knowing that students are highly bored, without taking their achievement level into account, might be insufficient for drawing conclusions about students’ behavior and personality. We, therefore, investigated if low- vs. high-achieving students who experience strong mathematics boredom show different behaviors and personality traits. The sample consisted of 1,404 German secondary school students (fifth to 10th grade, mean age 12.83 years, 52% female). We used self-report instruments to assess boredom in mathematics, behavioral (social and emotional problems, positive/negative affect, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression), and personality variables (neuroticism and conscientiousness). In comparing highly bored students (more than one SD above M, n = 258) who were low vs. high achievers (as indicated by the math grade, n = 125 / n = 119), results showed that there were no mean level differences across those groups for all variables. In conclusion, our results suggest that high boredom can occur in both low- and high-achieving students and that bored low- and high-achievers show similar behaviors and personality profiles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document