scholarly journals Reservoir characterization study: porosity and permeability of 148 Tertiary to Mississippian age outcrop samples, east-central Brooks Range Foothills and North Slope, Alaska

10.14509/3312 ◽  
2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Reifenstuhl ◽  
Andrea Loveland
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Said Beshry Mohamed ◽  
Sherif Ali ◽  
Mahmoud Fawzy Fahmy ◽  
Fawaz Al-Saqran

Abstract The Middle Marrat reservoir of Jurassic age is a tight carbonate reservoir with vertical and horizontal heterogeneous properties. The variation in lithology, vertical and horizontal facies distribution lead to complicated reservoir characterization which lead to unexpected production behavior between wells in the same reservoir. Marrat reservoir characterization by conventional logging tools is a challenging task because of its low clay content and high-resistivity responses. The low clay content in Marrat reservoirs gives low gamma ray counts, which makes reservoir layer identification difficult. Additionally, high resistivity responses in the pay zones, coupled with the tight layering make production sweet spot identification challenging. To overcome these challenges, integration of data from advanced logging tools like Sidewall Magnetic Resonance (SMR), Geochemical Spectroscopy Tool (GST) and Electrical Borehole Image (EBI) supplied a definitive reservoir characterization and fluid typing of this Tight Jurassic Carbonate (Marrat formation). The Sidewall Magnetic resonance (SMR) tool multi wait time enabled T2 polarization to differentiate between moveable water and hydrocarbons. After acquisition, the standard deliverables were porosity, the effective porosity ratio, and the permeability index to evaluate the rock qualities. Porosity was divided into clay-bound water (CBW), bulk-volume irreducible (BVI) and bulk-volume moveable (BVM). Rock quality was interpreted and classified based on effective porosity and permeability index ratios. The ratio where a steeper gradient was interpreted as high flow zones, a gentle gradient as low flow zones, and a flat gradient was considered as tight baffle zones. SMR logging proved to be essential for the proper reservoir characterization and to support critical decisions on well completion design. Fundamental rock quality and permeability profile were supplied by SMR. Oil saturation was identified by applying 2D-NMR methods, T1/T2 vs. T2 and Diffusion vs. T2 maps in a challenging oil-based mud environment. The Electrical Borehole imaging (EBI) was used to identify fracture types and establish fracture density. Additionally, the impact of fractures to enhance porosity and permeability was possible. The Geochemical Spectroscopy Tool (GST) for the precise determination of formation chemistry, mineralogy, and lithology, as well as the identification of total organic carbon (TOC). The integration of the EBI, GST and SMR datasets provided sweet spots identification and perforation interval selection candidates, which the producer used to bring wells onto production.


2021 ◽  
pp. 3570-3586
Author(s):  
Mohanad M. Al-Ghuribawi ◽  
Rasha F. Faisal

     The Yamama Formation includes important carbonates reservoir that belongs to the Lower Cretaceous sequence in Southern Iraq. This study covers two oil fields (Sindbad and Siba) that are distributed Southeastern Basrah Governorate, South of Iraq. Yamama reservoir units were determined based on the study of cores, well logs, and petrographic examination of thin sections that required a detailed integration of geological data and petrophysical properties. These parameters were integrated in order to divide the Yamama Formation into six reservoir units (YA0, YA1, YA2, YB1, YB2 and YC), located between five cap rock units. The best facies association and petrophysical properties were found in the shoal environment, where the most common porosity types were the primary (interparticle) and secondary (moldic and vugs) . The main diagenetic process that occurred in YA0, YA2, and YB1 is cementation, which led to the filling of pore spaces by cement and subsequently decreased the reservoir quality (porosity and permeability). Based on the results of the final digital  computer interpretation and processing (CPI) performed by using the Techlog software, the units YA1 and YB2 have the best reservoir properties. The unit YB2 is characterized by a good effective porosity average, low water saturation, good permeability, and large thickness that distinguish it from other reservoir units.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadzlin Hasani Kasim ◽  
Budi Priyatna Kantaatmadja ◽  
Wan Nur Wan M Zainudin ◽  
Amita Ali ◽  
Hasnol Hady Ismail ◽  
...  

Abstract Predicting the spatial distribution of rock properties is the key to a successful reservoir evaluation for hydrocarbon potential. However, a reservoir with a complex environmental setting (e.g. shallow marine) becomes more challenging to be characterized due to variations of clay, grain size, compaction, cementation, and other diagenetic effects. The assumption of increasing permeability value with an increase of porosity may not be always the case in such an environment. This study aims to investigate factors controlling the porosity and permeability relationships at Lower J Reservoir of J20, J25, and J30, Malay Basin. Porosity permeability values from routine core analysis were plotted accordingly in four different sets which are: lithofacies based, stratigraphic members based, quartz volume-based, and grain-sized based, to investigate the trend in relating porosity and permeability distribution. Based on petrographical studies, the effect of grain sorting, mineral type, and diagenetic event on reservoir properties was investigated and characterized. The clay type and its morphology were analyzed using X-ray Diffractometer (XRD) and Spectral electron microscopy. Results from porosity and permeability cross-plot show that lithofacies type play a significant control on reservoir quality. It shows that most of the S1 and S2 located at top of the plot while lower grade lithofacies of S41, S42, and S43 distributed at the middle and lower zone of the plot. However, there are certain points of best and lower quality lithofacies not located in the theoretical area. The detailed analysis of petrographic studies shows that the diagenetic effect of cementation and clay coating destroys porosity while mineral dissolution improved porosity. A porosity permeability plot based on stratigraphic members showed that J20 points located at the top indicating less compaction effect to reservoir properties. J25 and J30 points were observed randomly distributed located at the middle and bottom zone suggesting that compaction has less effect on both J25 and J30 sands. Lithofacies description that was done by visual analysis through cores only may not correlate-able with rock properties. This is possibly due to the diagenetic effect which controls porosity and permeability cannot visually be seen at the core. By incorporating petrographical analysis results, the relationship between porosity, permeability, and lithofacies can be further improved for better reservoir characterization. The study might change the conventional concept that lower quality lithofacies does not have economic hydrocarbon potential and unlock more hydrocarbon-bearing reserves especially in these types of environmental settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document