scholarly journals Avançou? Retrocedeu? Considerações sobre os direitos humanos e as ações afirmativas para os povos Indígenas na América Latina

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Juliane Sachser Angnes ◽  
Elisa Yoshie Ichikawa ◽  
Marcel Luciano Klozovski ◽  
Maria De Fátima Quintal de Freitas

This theoretical essay proposes to understand how the contemporary conception of Human Rights is configured, and from that, to articulate the affirmative actions for Indigenous peoples inserted in this conception. In other words, it reflects on how this process took place in Latin America, that is, whether these actions proposed in Latin America for Indigenous peoples adopt a perspective constituted by the “subject of law” being seen in its particularity and peculiarity, and whether there have been advances or setbacks. The results showed that, specifically, from the conceptions presented at the International Labor Organization (OIT) there was a break in the integrationist paradigm, showing a real advance in the expressions of these conceptions and the ways in which indigenous societies are understood, at least in the applied legislation in Latin America. However, there is still much to reflect on and fight for.

1985 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 556-569
Author(s):  
Guy S. Goodwin-Gill ◽  
R.K. Jenny ◽  
Richard Perruchoud

This article seeks to: 1) examine the general status in international law of certain fundamental human rights, to determine the minimum “no derogation” standards; and 2) survey briefly a number of formal agreements between states governing migration matters, while examining some of the standard-setting work undertaken by the International Labor Organization and other institutions. Finally, certain conclusions will be drawn regarding the content and administration of the relevant law, in the light of the requirement to ensure the effective and efficient implementation of international legal obligations.


1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Richard N. Cooper ◽  
Héctor G. Bartolomei de la Cruz ◽  
Geraldo Von Potobsky ◽  
Lee Swepston ◽  
Lance A. Compa ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Elisa Cruz Rueda

El entender la consulta como derecho ciudadano que conlleva el consentimiento previo e informado sobre temas que afectan a la ciudadanía, y sobre todo como derecho colectivo de los pueblos indígenas, incluidos los de México, no ha sido desarrollado hasta el momento. La intención de este trabajo es argumentar la necesidad del reconocimiento de este derecho y cómo en la práctica los pueblos indígenas han sido afectados en sus territorios al no ser consultados. En el mismo sentido, se hace un análisis que toma como referentes el Convenio 169 para Pueblos indígenas y tribales en países independientes, de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo, y la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Finalmente se comparte una propuesta de consulta a pueblos indígenas.   ABSTRACT Understanding has not been developed to date regarding the right to consultation as a citizen right that implies prior and informed consent by citizens regarding issues affecting them, and in particular as a collective right of indigenous peoples, including the indigenous peoples of Mexico. The intention of this document is to argue the need for recognition of this right and to discuss how territorial rights of indigenous peoples have been affected in practice due to lack of consultation. In this same sense, an analysis is presented with references to the International Labor Organization (ILO) Agreement 169 on indigenous and tribal peoples in independent countries, and to Mexico’s Constitution. Finally, a proposal is presented regarding consultation of indigenous peoples.


Percurso ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (28) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Thayse Edith Coimbra SAMPAIO

RESUMOO presente artigo propõe debater o novo estágio do direito constitucional no Brasil e na Europa, denominado “neoconstitucionalismo”. Na sequência, examina seus marcos: históricos –pós-guerra na Europa continental e a redemocratização no Brasil; filosóficos – o pós-positivismo, que está na confluência entre o jusnaturalismo e o positivismo, e teóricos- a força normativa da Constituição, expansão da jurisdição constitucional, a irradiação sobre as normas inferiores e o desenvolvimento de uma nova dogmática interpretativa. Sempre atento as especificidades do constitucionalismo na América Latina. Finaliza problematizando, quais são os seus desafios para os povos indígenas brasileiros, a partir do julgamento do Caso Raposa Serra do Sol e do Estatuto do índio. Utiliza como referência básica o pensamento de Barroso e emprega uma pesquisa descritiva com análise de conteúdos. Visto que a intenção é revelar as ambiguidades do neoconstitucionalismo, quando o assunto é “povos indígenas”. PALAVRAS-CHAVES: Neoconstitucionalismo; Desafios; Povos Indígenas brasileiros. ABSTRACTThis article proposes to discuss the new stage of constitutional law in Brazil and in Europe, called "neoconstitutionalism". In the sequence, it examines its milestones: history-post-war in continental Europe and redemocratization in Brazil; philosophical - post-positivism, which is at the confluence between natural and positivism, and theoretical - the normative force of the Constitution, expansion of constitutional jurisdiction, the irradiation on the lower norms and the development of a new interpretative dogmatics. Always aware of the specificities of constitutionalism in Latin America. He ends by discussing, what are his challenges for the Brazilian indigenous peoples, based on the Raposa Serra do Sol Case and the Indian Statute judgment. It uses as a basic reference Barroso's thinking and employs a descriptive research with content analysis. Since the intention is to reveal the ambiguities of neoconstitutionalism, when the subject is "indigenous peoples". KEYWORDS: Neo-constitutionalism; Challenges; Brazilian Indigenous Peoples.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Paladino

Para a Sessão “Documento”, o Dossiê Processos Educativos e povos indígenas: significados, práticas e disputas étnico-políticas no contexto contemporâneo, apresenta dois instrumentos legais de âmbito internacional (a Convenção n° 107 e a Convenção n° 169 sobre povos indígenas e tribais da Organização Internacional do Trabalho) fundamentais para o reconhecimento dos povos indígenas e seus direitos. Aos fins da temática do dossiê, escolhemos destacar os artigos dessas convenções concernentes aos direitos educacionais.ABSTRACTFor the Document Session, the Dossier Educational Processes and Indigenous Peoples: meanings, practices and ethnic-political disputes in the contemporary context, presents two international legal instruments Convention n. 107 and Convention n. 169 on indigenous and tribal peoples of the International Labor Organization) that are fundamental for the recognition of indigenous peoples and their rights. At the end of the dossier theme, we chose to highlight the articles of these conventions concerning educational rights.Keywords:Indigenous rights. Convention n 107 of the ILO. Convention n. 169 of the ILO. Indigenous scholar education


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document