The Implementation of Scientific Approach for Cooperative Learning Model Typed Inside Outside Circle (IOC) Toward the Science Learning Outcomes of the Seventh Graders of Lawang Public Islamic JHS Mandahiling

Author(s):  
Sri Maiyena ◽  
Kuntum Khaira ◽  
Widia Oktavia

The science learning outcomes of grade VIII students at MTsN Lawang Mandahiling are still low. Students physics's low learning outcomes are because teachers still dominate physics learning, and the intensity of student involvement when learning is a little. This study aims to determine how to apply a scientific approach to the Inside-Outside Circle cooperative learning model for students' physics learning outcomes. This type of research is quasi-experimental research, with the research design used is posttest only control group design. Sampling used random sampling, resulting in two sample classes, namely class VIII.2 as the experimental and VIII.3 as the control class. The data collection used a test of student learning outcomes on knowledge competencies in a multiple-choice test of 20 items. The competency data of students' attitudes and skills used observation sheets which were analyzed qualitatively descriptive. The results of the final tests conducted in the study showed that the physics learning outcomes of students in the experimental class were better than the control class. The average final score of students for knowledge competence in the experimental class and control class, respectively, was 78.00 and 66.00. For attitudinal competence, the average scores obtained by the experimental class and control class were 68.98 and 65.34, respectively. For the competency skills, the average scores obtained by the experimental class and control class are 74.22 and 68.25, respectively. Hypothesis testing is done by using a t-test. From the calculation on knowledge competency, the result of tcount = 3.07 while ttable = 1.684; on attitude competence, the price of tcount = 2.29; on skills competency, the tcount = 4.26; while ttable = 1.684 while t table = 1.684 at the real level α = 0.05. It means that tcount> ttable so that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. It can be concluded that the students' physics learning outcomes in applying the synthetic approach to the Inside-Outside Circle cooperative learning model are better than the physics learning outcomes of students who do not use the Inside-Outside Circle cooperative learning model in solar system subject matter in grade VIII  MTsN Lawang Mandahiling.

Horizon ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
Mega Mega

This study aims to determine whether there is an effect on the physics learning outcomes of students by applying the Circuit Learning model instead of using a scientific approach in class XI MIPA at SMA Kartika I-5 Padang. This type of research is a quasy experiment, with a randomized control group only design. This research was conducted in two sample classes, namely class XI MIPA 2 and class XI MIPA 4 at SMA Kartika I-5 Padang. The instruments used in this study were the essay test and the observation assessment sheet. Based on the results of data analysis, it was known that both sample classes were normally distributed and not homogeneous at the real level = 0.05. The test statistic used was the two-parts t test. Based on the results of the calculation, hypothesis testing is obtained = −7,25 withttabel = 2,04 because - ttabel < 1 < ttabel with = 2.04 because - then reject H0 and H1 is accepted where the hypothesis is accepted. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the experimental class activities are better than the control class learning activities. So it can be concluded that hypothesis in this study is physics learning. The outcomes learning of students using the Circuit Learning model accompanied by LKPD on students' physics learning outcomes were better than the physics learning outcomes of students who used scientific learning models in class XI MIPA SMA I-5 Kartika Padang.


Author(s):  
Nora Mawinda ◽  
Zulkifli Naansah ◽  
Hanesman Hanesman

The problem in this study is the low learning outcomes achieved by students on the subjects of Basic Electrical and Electronics which is below the minimum completeness criteria (KKM) set a school that is 75 This is presumably because they are learning is often used during the learning model is applied directly proven yet effective. The purpose of this research is to reveal how much influence the Jigsaw cooperative learning model to study the results of class X students on subjects TAV Basic Electricity and Electronics. This research is an experimental study with a draft Post-test only control group design. The sample were students of class X TAV at SMK 1 Padang Academic Year 2014 / 2015. Class experiment is treated using Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model and the control group is a class that uses the direct teaching model. The data is taken from the test results in the form of learning about the objective as many as 31 items. Data were analyzed manually to test for normality, homogeneity testing, and hypothesis testing. The result of the calculation hypothesis at significance level α = 0.05 was found that t count> t table is 3.35> 1.670. The results of these tests give an interpretation that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted, this means that on average significantly experimental class learning outcomes greater than the average control class learning outcomes.  Key words :   Models of Learning, Jigsaw, Learning Direct, Post-test only control group design, Learning outcomes, Experimental, and Control.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Rajo Hasim Lubis

This study aims to determine: learning outcomes physics students with cooperative learning model GI and conventional learning, learning outcomes physics students who have Adversity Quotient (AQ) high and medium AQ and interaction cooperative learning model GI and AQ in affecting learning physics students.  This quasi-experimental study using pretest-posttest control group design. The sample in this research is class X IPA.4 as an experimental class and class X IPA.3 as the control class is selected by simple random sampling. The instrument used is the achievement test and which AQ questionnaire form. Data was analyzed using two ways  ANOVA. The results shows that: learning outcomes physics students with cooperative learning model GI better than conventional learning, learning outcomes physics students who have a high AQ better than students who have a medium AQ and there is interaction between cooperative learning model GI and AQ in influencing physics student learning outcomes.


Author(s):  
Rohimin Rohimin ◽  
Wiji Aziiz Hari Mukti ◽  
Septa Oktaviani ◽  
Muhammad Erfan ◽  
Tursina Ratu

Although many have raised the Inquiry learning model and the Number Head Together (NHT) learning model, there is no research on comparison of the two models in natural science subjects. This study aims to determine whether the learning outcomes of the 5th grade science students taught using the Inquiry Learning Model is better than using the Cooperative Learning Model Number Head Together (NHT) type in SDNegeri 66 Bengkulu City. This study used two groups, namely class 5A with 31 people as the experimental group and class 5B with 31 people as the control group. This research variable consists of independent variables namely Inquiry learning model and Number Head Together (NHT) learning model while the dependent variable is the science learning outcomes. This type of research is quantitative research with Nonequivalent Control Group Design approach. Data collection techniques using observation and multiple choice test questions. Data analysis techniques using the t test. Based on the results of the study found in the posttest results of class 5A students who use Inquiry Learning Model in the medium and high categories as many as 31 students (93%) get grades of 60 to 100 while the learning outcomes of class 5B that use Cooperative Learning Models Type Number Head Together ( NHT) as many as 31 students (81%) get a value of 50 to 90. It can also be proven by the results of the t test calculation that is tcount of 4.352 and the value of the table for df = 60 with a significance level of 5% is 2,000. From the analysis it was found that tcount is greater than ttable (4.352> 2,000). The results showed that the learning outcomes of Natural Sciences 5th grade students who were taught using the Inquiry Learning Model were better than using the Cooperative Learning Model Number Head Together (NHT) type at SDN 66 Kota Bengkulu.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Muhamad Miftahul Alim ◽  
Ketut Prasetyo ◽  
Sunarto Sunarto

This study aims to determine the consistent changes of students' learning motivation resulting from the learning process using the STAD learning model and its effect on student learning outcomes. This study was the pretest-posttest control group design. Sample in this study was VIII class who were randomly determined. The data obtained then tested different using independent sample t-test. The results showed that the two research classes experienced a positive change in the motivation and learning outcomes of students. In the experimental class with STAD learning model showed motivation and learning outcomes that were better than class control. The post-test calculation shows that learners' motivation with the Sig. (2-tailed) 0.003, where 0.003 <0.05 means that there are significant differences. Learning outcomes that show the value of Sig. (2-tailed) 0,000, where 0,000 <0,05 means that there are significant differences between the experimental and control classes. The existence of significant differences indicates that there is an effect of the STAD learning model on students' motivation and learning outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Fitria Silviana

This study aims: 1) to determine differences in science process skills of students with This study aims to determine: teamwork ability of students with cooperative learning model of type of group investigation and the ability to work with students with conventional learning, the effect  of cooperative learning model of group investigation on learning outcomes of students in learning physics., correlation  between the ability of teamwork and learning outcomes students. This research uses type of quasi-experimental with two group pretest-posttest  design. The study population was standard X SMA.Negeri 1 Langsa.The sample of this research were the students of X.10 as experiment group and X.9 as control group that established by purpossive sampling. The instruments used consist of observation sheets of teamwork and essay test of learning outcomes. The data were analyzed using parametric t-test analysis. The results showed that: The teamwork ability of  students who are taught by cooperative learning model type group investigation better than students taught by conventional teaching in physics learning, cooperative learning model of type of group investigation has effect on student learning outcomes. Learning outcomes of students taught by cooperative learning model of type of group investigation better than on learning outcomes for students who taught by conventional learning, and there is a correlation between the teamwork ability  with student learning outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Maria Sisilia ◽  
Jamaluddin Sakung ◽  
Irwan Said

The aim of this study is to determine the learning outcomes of students in the class which is treatedwith the cooperative learning model Jigsaw whether it is better than the untreated class on chemicalequilibrium topic. This study is a quasi-experimental research design with Non Randomized Pretest-posttest control group design. The population in this study is 245 students of class XI MIA withacademic year 2014/2015, from 8 classes. The sample in this study class XI MIA 5 (n = 32) as anexperimental class while class XI MIA 6 (n = 32) as a control class. The analysis of data obtained inthe experimental class, X1 1 valueis 79.66 with a standard deviation = 9.41. In the control class, X2valueis 70.03 with a standard deviation = 11.13. The result of hypothesisis found that tcalculated>ttable(5.53 > 1.67) with a significance level (α = 0.05) and degrees of freedom = 62. This shows that H0 isrejected and H1 is accepted. Therefore, it can be concluded that student learning outcomes in class which is treated using the cooperative learning model Jigsaw is better than the untreated class on chemicalequilibrium topic.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-17
Author(s):  
Dina Dahliana ◽  
Nike Sri Setiawati ◽  
Taufina Taufina

The purpose of this study is to influence the use of a scientific approach to student learning outcomes in science learning in SD Negeri 10 Lambung Bukit, Pauh District, Padang. This research is an experimental research type Quasi Experimental Design with the design of The Static Comparison: Randomized Control Group Only Design. The population in this study were all students in grade IV semester II SD Negeri 10 Lambung Bukit District Pauh which consisted of 2 classes totaling 47 people. Based on the data analysis, the results of testing of the data from the sample class are normally distributed and homogeneous. Furthermore, hypothesis testing was done by t-test showing tcount = 2.464 and ttable = 1.677 with db = 47 (n1 + n2–2 = 24 + 25-2 = 47) and a significant level of 5%. Based on the t-test t table (2,464 1,677) then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted, with the conclusion that student learning outcomes that use a scientific approach are better than student learning outcomes without using a scientific approach to student learning outcomes in science learning in grade IV elementary school Negeri 10 Lambung Bukit District Pauh.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Putu Hermayanti ◽  
Made Sumantri ◽  
I Komang Sudarma

This study aims to determine the differences of science learning outcomes between groups of students who were taught by cooperative learning model of Team Games Tournament (TGT) type assisted concept maps and groups of students who were taught by conventional model in V grade II students in Gugus VI Kecamatan Sukasada, Kabupaten Buleleng academic year 2016/2017. The research design used is non equivalent posttest-only control group design. The population in this study is all students of grade V SD GugusV I Sukasada District, Buleleng District. Determination of sample is done by random sampling technique, so that got two classes that is class V SD Negeri 2 Panji Anom amounted to 33 students as experiment class and class V student of SD Negeri 4 Panji Anom amounted 30 student as control class. The instrument of data collection in this research is multiple choice test (objective) with two stages of analysis that is descriptive static analysis and inferential statistical analysis (t-test). The result of this research is t-test, tct = 14,4> ttable = 1,98 (with db 61 and significance level 5%), so H0 is rejected and H1 accepted. Thus, it can be stated that cooperative learning model of Team Games Tournament type (TGT) with concept map has significant effect on science learning outcomes of class V students in Gugus VI Sukasada Sub-district of Buleleng Regency in the Lesson Year 2016/2017.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lia Saptini Handriani ◽  
Ahmad Harjono ◽  
Aris Doyan

This study aims to determine the effect of structured inquiry learning model with scientific approach on student’s critical thinking skills and physics learning outcomes of class X in SMAN 1 Gerung in academic year 2014/2015. The study uses a quasi experiment with design untreated control group design with pretest and posttest. The sample was selected by clauster random sampling and obtained class X-3 as the experiment class using structured inquiry learning model with scientific approach and class X-6 as the control class using expository learning model. Data post-test were tested for normality, homogeneity, and hypothesis test. Hypothesis test using t-test polled variance with 5% of significance level. The results of the study were obtained: (1) there was the effect of structured inquiry learning model with scientific approach on student’s critical thinking skills and (2) there was the effect of structured inquiry learning model with scientific approach on student’s physics learning outcomes  This indicates that the structured inquiry learning model with scientific approach is better than the expository learning model. Expected to do further research on structured inquiry learning model with scientific approach that measure the other of higher order thinking skills.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document