Bond Stress-Slip Response of Reinforcing Bars Embedded in FRC Matrices under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading

10.14359/502 ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 94-96 ◽  
pp. 543-546
Author(s):  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Ai Zhong Lu ◽  
Yun Qian Xu ◽  
Pan Cui

Direct pull-out tests were performed to evaluate the bond performance of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcing bars in cement mortar. Specimens with different bar diameters and different grouted lengths (i.e., 5d, 10d and 15d, d is the diameter of bars) are prepared for the pull-out tests. For comparison, specimens with plain aluminium alloy bars (AAB) were tested as well. The result shows that the average bond stress between plain aluminium alloy bars and cement is much smaller than that between the deformed GFRP bars and cement; thin GFRP bars tended to have larger average bond stress; the shorter the grouted length, the smaller the maximum average bond stress. Only part of grouted length undertakes the bond stress and the length depends on the shear modulus of GFRP and the surrounding material.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye-Jin Lee ◽  
Keun-Hyeok Yang ◽  
Si-Jun Kim ◽  
Sang-Hun Park

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeon-Jong Hwang ◽  
Hong-Gun Park ◽  
Won-Seok Choi ◽  
Lan Chung ◽  
Jin-Keun Kim

Structures ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 498-506
Author(s):  
Xiaoyong Lv ◽  
Zhiwu Yu ◽  
Zhi Shan

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guohua Xing ◽  
Cheng Zhou ◽  
Tao Wu ◽  
Boquan Liu

To evaluate the bond behavior between the reinforcing bar and surrounding concrete, a total of six-group pullout specimens with plain steel bars and two-group specimens with deformed steel bars, serving as a reference, are experimentally investigated and presented in this study. The main test parameters of this investigation include embedment length, surface type of reinforcing bars, and bar diameter. In particular, the bond mechanism of plain steel reinforcing bars against the surrounding concrete was analyzed by comparing with six-group pullout specimens with aluminium alloy bars. The results indicated that the bond stress experienced by plain bars is quite lower than that of the deformed bars given equal structural characteristics and details. Averagely, plain bars appeared to develop only 18.3% of the bond stress of deformed bars. Differing from the bond strength of plain steel bars, which is based primarily on chemical adhesion and friction force, the bond stress of aluminium alloy bars is mainly experienced by chemical adhesion and about 0.21~0.56 MPa, which is just one-tenth of that of plain steel bars. Based on the test results, a bond-slip model at the interface between concrete and plain bars is put forward.


2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jang-Woon Baek ◽  
Hong-Gun Park ◽  
Jae-Hoon Lee ◽  
Chang-Joon Bang

2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 1250015 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANAT RUANGRASSAMEE ◽  
ARCHAWIN SAWAROJ

When reinforced-concrete columns are subjected to lateral cyclic loading, columns usually suffer failures at plastic hinges. If the buckling of longitudinal reinforcements at plastic hinges can be prevented or delayed, columns are expected to carry gravity loads at a higher ductility level. In this study, the rebar-restraining collar (RRC) was developed to improve the post-buckling behavior of longitudinal reinforcements. The behavior was investigated under monotonic loading tests of reinforcing bars with the RRCs and the cyclic loading tests of two reinforced-concrete bridge columns with and without RRCs. From the monotonic loading test, it was found that the RRCs significantly improved the post-yielding behavior of longitudinal reinforcing bars. The ductility and energy dissipation of longitudinal reinforcing bars with RRCs was significantly higher than that of the bare bar. Then, cyclic loading tests of two reinforced-concrete bridge columns were conducted. The cross section of columns was 0.4 m × 0.4 m, and the effective height was 2.15 m. The ratio of longitudinal reinforcing bars was 0.0123, and the volumetric ratio of transverse reinforcement was 0.00424. The column with RRCs did not have buckling of longitudinal reinforcements and had the ductility enhancement of about 17%, comparing to the column without RRCs. One evident benefit of using the RRCs is to control damage at plastic hinges of columns. Hence, the repair cost of columns after an earthquake can be reduced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document