Utilization of solid-state fermented canola meal, camelina meal and lupin as potential protein sources in the diets of broiler chickens

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Oladapo Oluwaseye Olukomaiya
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 3293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aljuobori Ahmed ◽  
Idrus Zulkifli ◽  
Abdoreza Soleimani Farjam ◽  
Norhani Abdullah ◽  
Juan Boo Liang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oladapo Olukomaiya ◽  
Chrishanthi Fernando ◽  
Ram Mereddy ◽  
Xiuhua Li ◽  
Yasmina Sultanbawa

Proceedings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oladapo Oluwaseye Olukomaiya ◽  
Chrishanthi Fernando ◽  
Ram Mereddy ◽  
Xiuhua Li ◽  
Yasmina Sultanbawa

Camelina (Camelina sativa) also known as false flax or gold of pleasure is an oilseed crop of the Brassica (Cruciferae) family. Camelina is not a food crop, however, the by-product (meal or cake) obtained from the oil extraction of camelina seeds is useful as animal feed because of its moderate crude protein content. The dietary use of camelina meal in broiler diets is limited to low inclusion due to the presence of anti-nutritional factors such as fibre, phytic acid, glucosinolates and tannins which have negative effects on broiler performance. Solid-state fermentation (SSF) is a suitable processing method for enriching agroindustrial by-products since it offers several cost-effective and practical advantages. In the present study, the effect of SSF on the nutrient composition, phytic acid and total phenolic contents of expeller-extracted camelina meal was evaluated. Aspergillus ficuum (ATCC 66876) was used for SSF under aerobic conditions at 30oC for 7 days. Unfermented and fermented camelina meals were analyzed for dry matter, crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre, total sugar (sucrose) and starch as well as for pH, phytic acid and total phenolic contents. Crude protein was improved by 6.79% while total sugar and starch were reduced by 90.99% and 75.78%, respectively in the solid-state fermented camelina meal. Phytic acid and total phenolic contents were also decreased by 39.17% and 56.11%, respectively. This study revealed that SSF could be used to improve the nutritional quality of camelina meal for improved use in poultry feed formulation.


Animals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula ◽  
da Silva ◽  
Brandao ◽  
Dai ◽  
Faciola

Soybean meal (SBM) is a byproduct from the oil-industry widely used as protein supplement to ruminants worldwide due to its nutritional composition, high protein concentration, and availability. However, the dependency on monocultures such as SBM is problematic due to price fluctuation, availability and, in some countries, import dependency. In this context, oilseeds from the mustard family such as rapeseed/canola (Brassica napus and Brassica campestris), camelina (Camelina sativa), and carinata (Brassica carinata) have arisen as possible alternative protein supplements for ruminants. Therefore, the objective of this comprehensive review was to summarize results from studies in which canola meal (CM), camelina meal (CMM), and carinata meal (CRM) were fed to ruminants. This review was based on published peer-reviewed articles that were obtained based on key words that included the oilseed plant in question and words such as “ruminal fermentation and metabolism, animal performance, growth, and digestion”. Byproducts from oil and biofuel industries such as CM, CMM, and CRM have been evaluated as alternative protein supplements to ruminants in the past two decades. Among the three plants reviewed herein, CM has been the most studied and results have shown an overall improvement in nitrogen utilization when animals were fed CM. Camelina meal has a comparable amino acids (AA) profile and crude protein (CP) concentration to CM. It has been reported that by replacing other protein supplements with CMM in ruminant diets, similar milk and protein yields, and average daily gain have been observed. Carinata meal has protein digestibility similar to SBM and its CP is highly degraded in the rumen. Overall, we can conclude that CM is at least as good as SBM as a protein supplement; and although studies evaluating the use of CMN and CRM for ruminants are scarce, it has been demonstrated that both oilseeds may be valuable feedstuff for livestock animals. Despite the presence of erucic acid and glucosinolates in rapeseed, no negative effect on animal performance was observed when feeding CM up to 20% and feeding CMN and CRM up to 10% of the total diet.


Author(s):  
Ahmet Yavuz Pekel ◽  
Sunday Adetayo Adedokun ◽  
O. Adeola

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document