Thermal Noise in Optical Coatings

Author(s):  
Rand Dannenberg
2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory M. Harry ◽  
Helena Armandula ◽  
Eric Black ◽  
D. R. M. Crooks ◽  
Gianpietro Cagnoli ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
G. M. HARRY ◽  
D. R. M. CROOKS ◽  
G. CAGNOLI ◽  
J. HOUGH ◽  
S. ROWAN ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 1890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angie C. Lin ◽  
Riccardo Bassiri ◽  
Suraya Omar ◽  
Ashot S. Markosyan ◽  
Brian Lantz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. A229 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Granata ◽  
A. Amato ◽  
G. Cagnoli ◽  
M. Coulon ◽  
J. Degallaix ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 897-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory M Harry ◽  
Andri M Gretarsson ◽  
Peter R Saulson ◽  
Scott E Kittelberger ◽  
Steven D Penn ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Robinson ◽  
Eric Oelker ◽  
William Milner ◽  
Dhruv Kedar ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
David L. Wetzel ◽  
John A. Reffner ◽  
Gwyn P. Williams

Synchrotron radiation is 100 to 1000 times brighter than a thermal source such as a globar. It is not accompanied with thermal noise and it is highly directional and nondivergent. For these reasons, it is well suited for ultra-spatially resolved FT-IR microspectroscopy. In efforts to attain good spatial resolution in FT-IR microspectroscopy with a thermal source, a considerable fraction of the infrared beam focused onto the specimen is lost when projected remote apertures are used to achieve a small spot size. This is the case because of divergence in the beam from that source. Also the brightness is limited and it is necessary to compromise on the signal-to-noise or to expect a long acquisition time from coadding many scans. A synchrotron powered FT-IR Microspectrometer does not suffer from this effect. Since most of the unaperatured beam’s energy makes it through even a 12 × 12 μm aperture, that is a starting place for aperture dimension reduction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document