Development of a Structurally Imbedded Fiber Optic Impact Damage Detection System for Composite Materials

Author(s):  
R.M. Measures ◽  
N.D.W. Glossop ◽  
J. Lymer ◽  
R.C. Tennyson
2000 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi TSUDA ◽  
Shin-ichi TAKEDA ◽  
Kei URABE ◽  
Jun TAKAHASHI ◽  
Teruo KISHI

Author(s):  
Anand Asundi

An absence of proper design rules has limited the application of composite materials to specific areas. However, within these application areas there is still a need to regular monitor the component resulting in significant downtime and loss of revenue. To overcome this it is proposed to have an on-line monitoring system capable of global checking of the component. Fiber optic polarimetric sensors are chosen in this study to globally characterize the health of a component. Polarimetric sensors have better sensitivity than intensity sensors and at the same time are more rugged than interferometric sensors. In this study, the effect of debonds and fiber breakages are investigated in composite bend specimens.


2011 ◽  
Vol 393-395 ◽  
pp. 97-101
Author(s):  
Huan Ping Kong ◽  
Zheng Zhang ◽  
Li Fei Li

This paper studied factors influencing AU detection results on different damage specimens, including simulation frequency, transducer modes and transducer location. Correlation between acousto-ultrasonic parameters (AUP1, AUP2) and impact damage severity in composite was investigated. The results showed that as damage severity increased, AUP1 and AUP2 of three different transducers decreased. Applying low frequency transducer, the variation of AUP1 may indicate a more rapid detection prospect. In addition, applying S1-transducer and WD-transducer, AUP2 was more effective for the early damage detection. Varying transducer’s location, S1-transducer applying 500khz simulation frequency presented a valuable results.


1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Bonniau ◽  
Jean Chazelas ◽  
Jerome Lecuellet ◽  
Francois Gendre ◽  
Marc J. Turpin ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Tsutsui ◽  
Noriyoshi Hirano ◽  
Junichi Kimoto ◽  
Takahiko Akatsuka ◽  
Hirofumi Sashikuma ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Measures ◽  
N. D. W. Glossop ◽  
J. Lymer ◽  
S. Dubois ◽  
W. Tsaw ◽  
...  

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Sahar Hassani ◽  
Mohsen Mousavi ◽  
Amir H. Gandomi

This study presents a comprehensive review of the history of research and development of different damage-detection methods in the realm of composite structures. Different fields of engineering, such as mechanical, architectural, civil, and aerospace engineering, benefit excellent mechanical properties of composite materials. Due to their heterogeneous nature, composite materials can suffer from several complex nonlinear damage modes, including impact damage, delamination, matrix crack, fiber breakage, and voids. Therefore, early damage detection of composite structures can help avoid catastrophic events and tragic consequences, such as airplane crashes, further demanding the development of robust structural health monitoring (SHM) algorithms. This study first reviews different non-destructive damage testing techniques, then investigates vibration-based damage-detection methods along with their respective pros and cons, and concludes with a thorough discussion of a nonlinear hybrid method termed the Vibro-Acoustic Modulation technique. Advanced signal processing, machine learning, and deep learning have been widely employed for solving damage-detection problems of composite structures. Therefore, all of these methods have been fully studied. Considering the wide use of a new generation of smart composites in different applications, a section is dedicated to these materials. At the end of this paper, some final remarks and suggestions for future work are presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document