scholarly journals All-optical DAC using counter-propagating optical and electrical pulses in a Mach-Zehnder modulator

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (21) ◽  
pp. 26429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur James Lowery
2002 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 1710-1712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Wook Kang ◽  
Jang-Joo Kim ◽  
Eunkyoung Kim

1999 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 730 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Leclerc ◽  
P. Brindel ◽  
D. Rouvillain ◽  
E. Pincemin ◽  
B. Dany ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (14) ◽  
pp. 20064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunqi Song ◽  
Mingzheng Lei ◽  
Jinwang Qian ◽  
Zhennan Zheng ◽  
Shanguo Huang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Anoopshi Johari ◽  
Brajesh K. Kaushik ◽  
Abhinav Bhatnagar ◽  
Prabhat K. Dubey ◽  
Sanjeev Naithani

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Yin ◽  
Kun Xu ◽  
Jianqiang Li ◽  
Hao Huang ◽  
Ye Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
R. Hegerl ◽  
A. Feltynowski ◽  
B. Grill

Till now correlation functions have been used in electron microscopy for two purposes: a) to find the common origin of two micrographs representing the same object, b) to check the optical parameters e. g. the focus. There is a third possibility of application, if all optical parameters are constant during a series of exposures. In this case all differences between the micrographs can only be caused by different noise distributions and by modifications of the object induced by radiation.Because of the electron noise, a discrete bright field image can be considered as a stochastic series Pm,where i denotes the number of the image and m (m = 1,.., M) the image element. Assuming a stable object, the expectation value of Pm would be Ηm for all images. The electron noise can be introduced by addition of stationary, mutual independent random variables nm with zero expectation and the variance. It is possible to treat the modifications of the object as a noise, too.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document