Gender Role Attitudes and Fertility Revisited: Evidence from the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianqian Shang ◽  
Yongkun Yin
Sex Roles ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 29 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 317-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuko Morinaga ◽  
Irene Hanson Frieze ◽  
Anuska Ferligoj

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Hanson Frieze ◽  
Anuš;ka Ferligoj ◽  
Tina Kogovšek ◽  
Tanja Rener ◽  
Jasna Horvat ◽  
...  

Determinants of gender-role attitudes were examined in samples of university students from Pittsburgh in the United States, Ljubljana in Slovenia, and Osijek in Croatia. Surveys including items from the Attitudes Toward Women Scale and the Neosexism Scale were administered to a total of 1,544 U.S. students, 912 Slovene students, and 996 Croatian students between the years of 1991 and 2000. As predicted, men held less egalitarian or more sexist attitudes about the appropriate roles for women and men, and those with more frequent attendance at religious services held more sexist attitudes. No changes in attitudes were found for women over time, but Slovene males were found to become more traditional over time.


1995 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Futing Liao ◽  
Yang Cai

There are two major theoretical perspectives explaining differences in gender-role attitudes: the socialization or social-learning theory, and situational theory in the form of macrosituational and microsituational (microstructural) hypotheses. In this article, we synthesize the two theories. We use data from the 1985 General Social Survey to evaluate this synthetic theory for white women in the United States. The findings show that socialization, represented by women's educational attainment being influenced by their mothers' educational attainment, has no direct impact on gender-role attitudes. Socialization does indirectly influence attitudes via women's life situations, as represented by women's life course stages and the kin composition of their social networks. Life situations are more contemporaneous than socialization and, thus, have direct effects on family-related gender-role attitudes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-258
Author(s):  
Cornelius Cappelen ◽  
Jonas Linde ◽  
Petrus Olander

Abstract In this research note, the authors examine the extent to which one gender is more trusted than the other, relying on between-subjects survey experiments fielded in Germany, Norway and the United States. The authors’ findings reveal that respondents have substantially higher trust in women than in men, and that this is partly driven by gender role beliefs ascribing prosocial behavior more to women. Furthermore, across countries it is particularly trust in men that differs; trust in women is much more similar. The findings provide important insights into the sources of trust and why generalized trust differs between countries; they advance our understanding of how we relate to particular others and also groups of people with different ratios of men/women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document