All in a Drop: How Antony van Leeuwenhoek Discovered an Invisible World by Lori Alexander

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (11) ◽  
pp. 465-465
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Bush
2002 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 658-659
Author(s):  
Venita Jay

1998 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Stephen W. Carmichael

When I see a drawing by an earty microcopist, I am often Impressed by the amount of detail they illustrated. I am frequently amazed by the resolution they apparently were able to achieve with primitive (by today's standards) unconected optics. Were their instruments and observational skills realty that good, or were they just lucky, correctly guessing what was beneath their lens? In an amazing pictorial published in the April issue of Scientific American, Brian Ford convincingly answers this question.Ford describes the controversies surrounding descriptions by Antony van Leeuwenhoek in 1674 and Robert Brown in 1827. Both of these pioneer microscopists were often dismissed by their contemporaries and ignored for many years after their deaths. Leeuwenhoek was considered to be a man of fertile imagination whose observations of “animalcules” in pond slime were not appreciated until the time of Louis Pasteur.


1932 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 573 ◽  
Author(s):  
CARL V. WELLER

1708 ◽  
Vol 26 (324) ◽  
pp. 499-502

Sir, Since the Communicating to You my last Thoughts and Observations concerning Ra­zors some Weeks ago, I have often view'd the Hairs of my Chin with a Microscope after they were cut off, and always observed upon the white or Grey Hairs the Streaks which are made by the small Notches that, as I told you in my former, I had discover'd in my Razor, especially when those Hairs were Cut more obliquely than usual.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document