scholarly journals Geophysical excitation of nutation - comparasion of different models

2014 ◽  
pp. 193-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Vondrak
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid V. Zotov ◽  
Christian Bizouard

AbstractObserved polar motion consists of uniform circular motions at both positive (prograde) and negative (retrograde) frequencies. Generalized Euler–Liouville equations of Bizouard, taking into account Earth's triaxiality and asymmetry of the ocean tide, show that the corresponding retrograde and prograde circular excitations are coupled at any frequency. In this work, we reconstructed the polar motion excitation in the Chandler band (prograde and retrograde). Then we compared it with geophysical excitation, filtered out in the same way from the series of the Oceanic Angular Momentum (OAM) and Atmospheric Angular Momentum (AAM) for the period 1960–2000. The agreement was found to be better in the prograde band than in the retrograde one.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Wińska ◽  
Justyna Śliwińska ◽  
Jolanta Nastula

<p>Continental hydrological loading by land water, snow, and ice is a process that influences the Earth’s inertia tensor and is very important for full understanding of the excitation of polar motion. In this study, the hydrological contribution to decadal, inter-annual and multi-annual suppress polar motion derived from different GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) solutions as well as from SLR (Satellite Laser Ranging) and some climate models from CMIP6 project data is discussed here.</p><p>The main aim of this study is to show the influence of different representations of hydrological angular momentum (HAM) coming from different GRACE (mas concentration solutions - mascons, Terrestrial Water Storage changes, and Stokes Coefficients), SLR, and climate models solutions on agreement between Geodetic Angular Momentum (GAM) and geophysical excitations of polar motion been a sum of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrological Angular Momentum (AAM+OAM+HAM) in different spectral bands.</p><p>To do that, the geodetic and geophysical excitation functions are transformed into time-scale domain using the discrete wavelet transform based on the Complex Morlet wavelet functions. Next, the time series (GAM vs. geophysical ones) are compared in terms of semblance filtering, on the basis of their phase, as a function of frequency, and amplitude information of their cross-wavelet power.</p><p>Here, we would like to present the consistency between full polar motion excitations and geophysical fluids,  that are the sum of AAM  (pressure + wind), OAM  (bottom pressure +  currents), and HAM contributions. This analysis could let us indicate, which hydrological representation of different HAM solutions cause the biggest errors in the geodetic budget.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengshuo Duan ◽  
Cancan Xu ◽  
Xueqing Xu ◽  
Chengli Huang

<p>A significant 6-year oscillation (SYO) signal existing in the length-of-day (LOD) variations may reflect the fast dynamics of the Earth cores. The time-varying characteristic (TVC) of this signal may reveal the relevant details on the geophysical excitation process. However, it is still debate about the TVC of the SYO. Our previous works indicated that the SYO signal was showing an obviously decaying trend during 1962~2012 based on the normal Morlet wavelet transform (NMWT) method, while other works did not show the similar decaying result based on the other methods (e.g., the least square fitting- LSF). Here, in order to solve this controversial issue, we revisit the SYO and its TVC. Through a lot of numerical simulation tests, NMWT method is further confirmed to be a good approach to quantitatively recover the target damped harmonic signals from the complex background noises, but the classical LSF method can destroy the original harmonic signal. This work indicates that the unattenuated SYO result obtained by the LSF method is not reliable. In addition, this work further analyzes the LOD data during a longer span (i.e., 1840~2018) and extracts the SYO result in the time domain, the result of which  shows: 1) the amplitude modulation phenomenon of the SYO itself on the longer time span, revealing the relevant excitation information within the Earth system; 2) a decreasing trend of the SYO signal in its amplitude after 1960s, which further supports the current SYO decaying result during 1962~2019. This recovered SYO result during a longer time-span obtained by this work is significant to understand the nature of the SYO change and its excitation process.</p>


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 232-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.S. Gross

AbstractSpace-geodetic measurement systems are capable of determining: (1) a terrestrial, body-fixed reference frame defined in practice by the stated positions and secular motions of a set of observing stations, (2) a celestial, space-fixed reference frame defined in practice by the stated locations of celestial objects, and (3) the rotation parameters linking these two frames together. Five parameters are conventionally used to specify the orientation of the terrestrial frame with respect to the celestial frame: two nutation parameters, two polar motion parameters, and one spin parameter. The celestial ephemeris pole (CEP) is defined as the north pole of that axis about which the spin parameter (UT1) is measured. The two nutation parameters locate the CEP in the celestial frame, and the two polar motion parameters locate the CEP in the terrestrial frame. By examining the frame transformation matrices, an expression relating the location of the rotation pole to that of the CEP can be derived. In order to compare theoretical predictions with observations, results of models for the effect on the nutations of geophysical excitation processes such as diurnal oceanic current and sea level height variations should not only be given in terms of the location of the CEP (rather than of the rotation pole), but must also account for the resonance effects of the free core nutation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 107-122
Author(s):  
M. Winska

Abstract The hydrological contribution to decadal, inter-annual and multi-annual suppress polar motion derived from climate model as well as from GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) data is discussed here for the period 2002.3-2016.0. The data set used here are Earth Orientation Parameters Combined 04 (EOP C04), Flexible Global Ocean-Atmosphere-Land System Model: Grid-point Version 2 (FGOAL-g2) and Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) climate models and GRACE CSR RL05 data for polar motion, hydrological and gravimetric excitation, respectively. Several Hydrological Angular Momentum (HAM) functions are calculated here from the selected variables: precipitation, evaporation, runoff, soil moisture, accumulated snow of the FGOALS and GLDAS climate models as well as from the global mass change fields from GRACE data provided by the International Earth Rotation and Reference System Service (IERS) Global Geophysical Fluids Center (GGFC). The contribution of different HAM excitation functions to achieve the full agreement between geodetic observations and geophysical excitation functions of polar motion is studied here.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document