scholarly journals INFLUENCE OF THE PRESSURE HEAD SEQUENCE ON THE SOIL HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY DETERMINED WITH TENSION INFILTROMETER

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Bagarello ◽  
M. Castellini ◽  
M. Iovino
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Pressure Head ◽  
Soil Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Tension Infiltrometer ◽  
Soil Hydraulic

scholarly journals Field determined variation of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity functions using simplified analysis of internal drainage experiments

1994 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Villagra ◽  
P. Michiels ◽  
R. Hartmann ◽  
O.O.S. Bacchi ◽  
K. Reichardt
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Pressure Head ◽  
Field Method ◽  
Internal Drainage ◽  
Soil Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Simultaneous Measurements ◽  
Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Simplified Analysis ◽  
Soil Hydraulic ◽  
The Mathematical Model

Experimentally determined values of unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity are presented for an Alfisol of the county of Piracicaba, S.P., Brazil. Simultaneous measurements of soil water content and pressure head are made along a 125 m transect within an irrigated field during the internal drainage process. Calculations of the soil hydraulic conductivity were made using the instantaneous profile method (Watson, 1966) and the unit gradient method (LIBARDI et al., 1980). The spatial variability of the soil hydraulic conductivity manifested along the transect indicates the need to develop a field method to measure K(theta) within prescribed fiducial limits, taking into account quantitative evaluation of spatial and temporal variances associated with the mathematical model, instrument calibration and soil properties.

Simplified estimation of unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity using bulk electrical conductivity and particle size distribution

Soil Research ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Neyshabouri ◽  
Mehdi Rahmati ◽  
Claude Doussan ◽  
Boshra Behroozinezhad
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Conductivity ◽  
Particle Size ◽  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Particle Size Distribution ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Unsaturated Soil ◽  
Soil Core ◽  
Soil Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Core Samples ◽  
Soil Hydraulic

Unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity K is a fundamental transfer property of soil but its measurement is costly, difficult, and time-consuming due to its large variations with water content (θ) or matric potential (h). Recently, C. Doussan and S. Ruy proposed a method/model using measurements of the electrical conductivity of soil core samples to predict K(h). This method requires the measurement or the setting of a range of matric potentials h in the core samples—a possible lengthy process requiring specialised devices. To avoid h estimation, we propose to simplify that method by introducing the particle-size distribution (PSD) of the soil as a proxy for soil pore diameters and matric potentials, with the Arya and Paris (AP) model. Tests of this simplified model (SM) with laboratory data on a broad range of soils and using the AP model with available, previously defined parameters showed that the accuracy was lower for the SM than for the original model (DR) in predicting K (RMSE of logK = 1.10 for SM v. 0.30 for DR; K in m s–1). However, accuracy was increased for SM when considering coarse- and medium-textured soils only (RMSE of logK = 0.61 for SM v. 0.26 for DR). Further tests with 51 soils from the UNSODA database and our own measurements, with estimated electrical properties, confirmed good agreement of the SM for coarse–medium-textured soils (<35–40% clay). For these textures, the SM also performed well compared with the van Genuchten–Mualem model. Error analysis of SM results and fitting of the AP parameter showed that most of the error for fine-textured soils came from poorer adequacy of the AP model’s previously defined parameters for defining the water retention curve, whereas this was much less so for coarse-textured soils. The SM, using readily accessible soil data, could be a relatively straightforward way to estimate, in situ or in the laboratory, K(h) for coarse–medium-textured soils. This requires, however, a prior check of the predictive efficacy of the AP model for the specific soil investigated, in particular for fine-textured/structured soils and when using previously defined AP parameters.

Simple Field Methods for Estimating Soil Hydraulic Conductivity

1980 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. L. Libardi ◽  
K. Reichardt ◽  
D. R. Nielsen ◽  
J. W. Biggar
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Field Methods ◽  
Soil Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Soil Hydraulic

Changes in soil hydraulic conductivity after prescribed fires in Mediterranean pine forests

2019 ◽  
Vol 232 ◽  
pp. 1021-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Plaza-Álvarez ◽  
M.E. Lucas-Borja ◽  
J. Sagra ◽  
D.A. Zema ◽  
J. González-Romero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Pine Forests ◽  
Prescribed Fires ◽  
Soil Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Soil Hydraulic ◽  
Mediterranean Pine

scholarly journals Effect of the dewatering on the surrounding terrains during the construction of Metrostation 9-III of the Sofia Metropoliten

2021 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-209
Author(s):  
Ina Bojinova-Popova
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Deformation Modulus ◽  
Soil Deformation ◽  
Soil Hydraulic Conductivity ◽  
Soil Hydraulic

The international practice often faces significant settlements of terrains and structures due to dewatering. This study presents of the dewatering impact during the construction of Metrostation 9-III from the Sofia Metropoliten on the surrounding terrains and buildings. The subsidences are quantified for specific values of the soil deformation modulus and varying values of the soil hydraulic conductivity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document