The Consequences of Femoral Tunnel Misplacement in MPFL Reconstruction

OrthoMedia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Tunnel Misplacement

scholarly journals Tunnel-enlargement after MPFL reconstruction with a free gracilis graft does correlation with proximal tunnel malposition

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0014
Author(s):  
Efe Turgay ◽  
Almut Höger ◽  
Jens Figiel ◽  
Philip Roessler ◽  
Karl-Friedrich Schüttler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cartilage Damage ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Tunnel Enlargement ◽  
Tunnel Position ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Position ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Enlargement

Aims and Objectives: In current literature only one study investigates femoral tunnel enlargement after medial patello-femoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Aim of the present study was to investigate the occurrence of femoral tunnel enlargement after MPFL reconstruction and a possible correlation to femoral tunnel position as well as clinical outcome. Materials and Methods: Patients with a minimum follow-up of at least 24 months after MPFL reconstruction with a free gracilis graft and without concomitant procedures were identified by reviewing patient files. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were contacted and invited to participate in the study. After informed consent a clinical examination as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed. Tegner activity scale, Kujala score as well as the IKDC were evaluated. On MR images tunnel position in frontal and saggital planes, tunnel diameter as well as possible confounders such as cartilage damage were assessed. Results: 31 consecutive Patients (23 female, 8 male) were identified and took part in this ongoing investigation. Mean follow-up was 4.1 years. A femoral tunnel enlargement was noted in 12 patients. In 9 of these 12 patients the femoral tunnel was positioned too proximal. In the 19 patients that showed no tunnel enlargement only 6 tunnels were placed too proximal. Clinical results did not differ significantly between patient groups with or without tunnel enlargement regarding range of motion of the knee joint, Tegner, Kujala or IKDC score. Conclusion: Proximal malposition of the femoral tunnel was significantly more often in patients with femoral tunnel enlargement implying a biomechanical reason for tunnel enlargement after MPFL reconstruction. An impact on clinical outcome could not be perceived.

scholarly journals Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Femoral Tunnel Accuracy

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596711668774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie A. Hiemstra ◽  
Sarah Kerslake ◽  
Mark Lafave
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Tunnel Position ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Position ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Placement

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a procedure aimed to reestablish the checkrein to lateral patellar translation in patients with symptomatic patellofemoral instability. Correct femoral tunnel position is thought to be crucial to successful MPFL reconstruction, but the accuracy of this statement in terms of patient outcomes has not been tested. Purpose: To assess the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement in an MPFL reconstruction cohort and to determine the correlation between tunnel accuracy and a validated disease-specific, patient-reported quality-of-life outcome measure. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between June 2008 and February 2014, a total of 206 subjects underwent an MPFL reconstruction. Lateral radiographs were measured to determine the accuracy of the femoral tunnel by measuring the distance from the center of the femoral tunnel to the Schöttle point. Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) scores were collected a mean 24 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 155 (79.5%) subjects had adequate postoperative lateral radiographs and complete BPII scores. The mean duration of follow-up (±SD) was 24.4 ± 8.2 months (range, 12-74 months). Measurement from the center of the femoral tunnel to the Schöttle point resulted in 143 (92.3%) tunnels being categorized as “good” or “ideal.” There were 8 failures in the cohort, none of which occurred in malpositioned tunnels. The mean distance from the center of the MPFL tunnel to the center of the Schöttle point was 5.9 ± 4.2 mm (range, 0.5-25.9 mm). The mean postoperative BPII score was 65.2 ± 22.5 (range, 9.2-100). Pearson r correlation demonstrated no statistically significant relationship between accuracy of femoral tunnel position and BPII score ( r = –0.08; 95% CI, –0.24 to 0.08). Conclusion: There was no evidence of a correlation between the accuracy of MPFL reconstruction femoral tunnel in relation to the Schöttle point and disease-specific quality-of-life scores. Graft failure was not related to femoral tunnel placement. The patellofemoral instability population is complex, and patients present with multiple risk factors that, in addition to the accuracy of femoral tunnel position, contribute to quality of life and warrant further investigation.

scholarly journals Failure Analysis in Patients With Patellar Redislocation After Primary Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 232596712092617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias J. Feucht ◽  
Julian Mehl ◽  
Philipp Forkel ◽  
Andrea Achtnich ◽  
Andreas Schmitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Trochlear Dysplasia ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Tibial Tuberosity ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Tunnel Position ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Position ◽  
Valgus Malalignment

Background: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has become a popular surgical procedure to address patellofemoral instability. As a consequence of the growing number of MPFL reconstructions performed, a higher rate of failures and revision procedures has been seen. Purpose: To perform a failure analysis in patients with patellar redislocation after primary isolated MPFL reconstruction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients undergoing revision surgery for reinstability after primary isolated MPFL reconstruction were included. Clinical notes were reviewed to collect demographic data, information on the primary surgery, and the mechanism of patellar redislocation (traumatic vs nontraumatic). Preoperative imaging was analyzed regarding femoral tunnel position and the prevalence of anatomic risk factors (ARFs) associated with patellofemoral instability: trochlear dysplasia (types B through D), patella alta (Caton-Deschamps index >1.2, patellotrochlear index <0.28), lateralization of the tibial tuberosity (tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance >20 mm, tibial tuberosity–posterior cruciate ligament [TT-PCL] distance >24 mm), valgus malalignment (mechanical valgus axis >5°), and torsional deformity (internal femoral torsion >25°, external tibial torsion >35°). The prevalence of ARF was compared between patients with traumatic and nontraumatic redislocations and between patients with anatomic and nonanatomic femoral tunnel position. Results: A total of 26 patients (69% female) with a mean age of 25 ± 7 years were included. The cause of redislocation was traumatic in 31% and nontraumatic in 69%. Position of the femoral tunnel was considered nonanatomic in 50% of patients. Trochlear dysplasia was the most common ARF with a prevalence of 50%, followed by elevated TT-PCL distance (36%) and valgus malalignment (35%). The median number of ARFs per patient was 3 (range, 0-6), and 65% of patients had 2 or more ARFs. Patients with nontraumatic redislocations showed significantly more ARFs per patient, and the presence of 2 or more ARFs was significantly more common in this group. No significant difference was observed between patients with anatomic versus nonanatomic femoral tunnel position. Conclusion: Multiple anatomic risk factors and femoral tunnel malposition are commonly observed in patients with reinstability after primary MPFL reconstruction. Before revision surgery, a focused clinical examination and adequate imaging including radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), standing full-leg radiographs, and torsional measurement with computed tomography or MRI are recommended to assess all relevant anatomic parameters to understand an individual patient’s risk profile. During revision surgery, care must be taken to ensure anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel through use of anatomic and/or radiographic landmarks.

Analysis of Graft Length Change Patterns in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction via a Fluoroscopic Guidance Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1150-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takehiko Matsushita ◽  
Daisuke Araki ◽  
Yuichi Hoshino ◽  
Shinya Oka ◽  
Kyohei Nishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Length Change ◽  
Lateral View ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Original Position ◽  
Fluoroscopic Guidance ◽  
Change Pattern ◽  
Radiographic Parameters ◽  
Graft Length

Background: A fluoroscopic guidance method for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has been widely used to determine the anatomic femoral attachment site. Purpose: To examine the graft length change patterns in MPFL reconstruction with a fluoroscopic guidance method. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Forty-four knees of 42 patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction for the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation were examined prospectively. During surgery, suture anchors were inserted into the proximal one-third and center of the patella. A guide pin for the femoral tunnel was inserted into the position reported by Schöttle et al based on the true lateral view of the knee under fluoroscopic control. Changes in graft length patterns of the proximal and center anchors were examined through 0° to 120° of knee flexion. Favorable changes in length patterns were defined as meeting 2 of 3 criteria: (1) not long during flexion (≤3 mm between 30° and 120° of flexion) and either (2) nearly isometric during flexion between 0° and 90° or (3) slightly long during maximum extension (≤3 mm). Other patterns were considered unfavorable. If the change in length pattern was unfavorable, then the pin for the femoral tunnel was moved to different positions until it was favorable. Knees were separated into the favorable group and the unfavorable group. Differences between the groups regarding radiographic parameters were assessed. Student t test or chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Of the 44 knees, 31 (70.5%) showed favorable patterns. However, 13 knees (29.5%) showed unfavorable patterns; therefore, the position of the pin was changed. The mean ± SD distance from the original position to the final position was 5.3 ± 1.1 mm distal for 7 patients and 5.2 ± 0.4 mm posterodistal for 6 patients. Technical errors, including a nontrue lateral view and the tip of the wire not being in the determined area, were found for 4 of 13 knees in the unfavorable group. There was no statistical difference in radiographic parameters between the groups. Conclusion: The graft length change pattern could be nonphysiologic at the position determined through the fluoroscopic guidance method; thus, caution may be necessary. The change in length pattern should be checked before graft fixation. If the length change pattern is unfavorable, then it is advisable to move it approximately 5 to 7 mm distally or posterodistally from the first position.

scholarly journals Extensive Lateral Release and Medial Patello-femoral Ligament Reconstruction in 25 years of Chronic Fixed Lateral Patellar Dislocation: A 5 year follow up Case Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0048
Author(s):  
Andri Lubis ◽  
Petrus Aprianto ◽  
Yudistira P. Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Patellar Dislocation ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Lateral Release ◽  
Modified Technique ◽  
Lateral Dislocation ◽  
Cortical Screw ◽  
Lateral Patellar Dislocation

Objectives: Chronically fixed lateral patellar dislocation is uncommon and mostly associated with disruption of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) which is a major risk factor for this condition, as it functions as the main patella medial stabilizer. This paper focuses on the reconstruction of the MPFL after an extensive lateral release in a fixed lateral patellar dislocation. We aim to explain the technique that was used to reduce and maintain the position of the patella and prevent it from re-dislocation. Extensive lateral release and modified MPFL reconstruction for a chronically fixed patellar lateral dislocation provide a satisfactory result. We aim to explain a modified technique to treat a chronically fixed patellar lateral dislocation Case presentation: We present a case report of a 49-year-old Caucasian male with a history of falling on his right knee 25 years before. He complained of pain on his knee for 8 months before. Physical examination showed chronically fixed lateral patellar dislocation with a normal range of motion. The diagnosis of patellar dislocation was confirmed with a conventional radiograph. The patient underwent extensive lateral release of the knee followed by a modified technique for MPFL reconstruction. Semitendinosus tendon was used as the graft because of the chronic nature of this condition. The graft was inserted into the patellar tunnel and fixed using endobutton®. The graft was inserted into the femoral tunnel that was made at Schottle point from the medial through the lateral side. After that, the cortical screw with the washer was inserted on the lateral femoral side just above the femoral tunnel as an anchor to make sure the tendon is secured. We follow-up the patient for 5 years. Results and Conclusion: On a 5 year follow-up, there was no complaint of recurrent patellar dislocation. The result of this extensive lateral release followed by modified MPFL reconstruction for a chronically fixed lateral patellar dislocation is satisfactory. The extensive release was needed to reduce the fixed dislocated patella and this modified technique of MPFL reconstruction by using screw and washer as an anchor on lateral sides of the femur could be an alternative to prevent re-dislocation.

Radiographic images are inapplicable for a precise evaluation of the femoral tunnel position following MPFL reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 3432-3440
Author(s):  
Vera Jaecker ◽  
Lars Neumann ◽  
Sven Shafizadeh ◽  
Paola Koenen ◽  
Ajay C. Kanakamedala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Radiographic Images ◽  
Tunnel Position ◽  
Precise Evaluation ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Position

Optimal Fluoroscopic Angulation to Determine Intercondylar Notch Violation during Pediatric Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derrick M. Knapik ◽  
Conor F. McCarthy ◽  
Ian Drummond ◽  
Raymond W. Liu ◽  
Allison Gilmore
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Kirschner Wire ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Intercondylar Notch ◽  
Fluoroscopic Guidance ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Femoral Physis ◽  
Schöttle’S Point

AbstractPrevious anatomic data has suggested that during pediatric medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, the femoral tunnel must be angled distally and anteriorly to avoid damage to the distal femoral physis and then intercondylar notch. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal degree of fluoroscopic angulation necessary to radiographically determine the presence of intercondylar notch violation. Fourteen adult cadaveric human femora were disarticulated and under fluoroscopic guidance, Schöttle's point was identified. A 0.62-mm Kirschner wire was then drilled through the condyle to create minimal notch violation. The femur was then placed on a level radiolucent table and coronal plane radiographs angled from −15 to 60 degrees were obtained in 5-degree increments to determine the fluoroscopic angle at which intercondylar notch violation was most evident. Grading of optimal fluoroscopic angle between two authors found that violation of the notch was the best appreciated at a mean angle of 43 ± 15 degrees from neutral. Results from this study emphasize the importance of angling the beam to essentially obtain a notch view to assess for a breech.

scholarly journals Morphological changes in the femoral tunnel aperture following anatomic MPFL reconstruction

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Keisuke Kita ◽  
Yoshinari Tanaka ◽  
Hiroshi Amano ◽  
Yukiyoshi Toritsuka ◽  
Ryohei Uchida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction

Arthroscopic assisted femoral tunnel drilling for the intra-articular anatomic cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in dogs

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (05) ◽  
pp. 299-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Böttcher ◽  
A. Bolia
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Bone Tunnel ◽  
Lateral Condyle ◽  
Cranial Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Technical Requirements ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Drilling ◽  
Tunnel Positioning ◽  
Tunnel Misplacement

SummaryObjective: To develop and test an arthroscopic aiming device for extrato intra-articular femoral tunnel drilling emerging at the center of the femoral insertion of the cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) in medium to large breed dogs. Material and methods: Hindlimbs (n = 12) of six cadaveric dogs (≥ 20 kg bodyweight). One hindlimb from each cadaver was randomly chosen. On a standard medio-lateral stifle radiograph the caudo-cranial position of the CrCL center was measured and transferred onto an adjustable aiming device. After arthroscopic debridement of the CrCL the aiming device was hooked behind the lateral condyle and a 2.4 mm guide pin was placed from extrato intra-articular. The intra-articular position of the resulting bone tunnel was evaluated radiographically as well as compared to the anatomic CrCl center of the contralateral hindlimb using 3D renderings. Results: According to the postoperative radiographs all six drill tunnels were located at or near the CrCL center. The median absolute 3D error from the anatomical center of the CrCL was 0.6 mm (range: 0.2–0.9 mm). Conclusion: Precise anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel for intra-articular repair of the CrCL was achieved using an adjustable aiming device. Clinical relevance: The proposed technique will reduce femoral tunnel misplacement when performing intra-articular CrCL repair in dogs. In combination with the published technique for arthroscopic tibial tunnel drilling using a similar aiming device, the technical requirements for arthroscopic assisted tunnel positioning for anatomical graft replacement are available.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document