Estimation of response reduction factor of RC frame staging in elevated water tanks using nonlinear static procedure

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suraj O. Lakhade ◽  
Ratnesh Kumar ◽  
Omprakash R. Jaiswal
Keyword(s):  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Rc Frame ◽  
Response Reduction Factor ◽  
Nonlinear Static Procedure ◽  
Nonlinear Static ◽  
Elevated Water ◽  
Water Tanks

scholarly journals Seismic Performance of Elevated Reinforced Concrete Water Tanks

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Sandesh Sagar Tripathi ◽  
Kamal Bahadur Thapa
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Water Tank ◽  
Geological Condition ◽  
Response Reduction Factor ◽  
Economical Design ◽  
Elevated Water ◽  
Water Tanks

Most of the codal provisions used worldwide for the design of elevated water tanks incorporates the nonlinear response through reduction factor that considers overstrength, ductility and redundancy. The majority of these codes provide a value which incorporates the demand of their geological condition and construction industry. In Nepal, there is lack of own guidelines and codes for the seismic design of elevated water tanks. In the present work, seismic performance of elevated reinforced concrete (RC) Intze type water tank is evaluated and value of the response reduction factor (R) for the design of such tank is determined. In this research work 34 models of elevated reinforced water tank were analyzed using SAP 2000 to evaluate the seismic performance with varying tank filling condition and staging height for 450 cumec and 225 cumec capacity. Based on the results, it is concluded that single value of response reduction factor cannot be justified for all heights and capacity of elevated RC water tank. So, for economical design purpose, estimation of response reduction factor with exact analysis is preferred.

scholarly journals Analytical Investigation of Response Reduction Factor (R) for R.C. Elevated Water Tank with Non-linear Static (Pushover) Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saurabh Kulkarni ◽  
S. S Kadam ◽  
P. B Zambare
Keyword(s):  
Soil Properties ◽  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Water Tank ◽  
Response Reduction Factor ◽  
Finite Element Software ◽  
Nonlinear Static ◽  
Static Pushover Analysis ◽  
Nonlinear Static Pushover Analysis

In the present work, an attempt is made to investigate response reduction factor (R) values of different soil types by using nonlinear static (Pushover) analysis for R.C. elevated rectangular water tank structure. All the parameters were investigated by varying properties of soft, medium and hard soils to cover a method of nonlinear static (Pushover) analysis. The zone factor (Z) kept constant Z – III for pandharpur site location and capacity of 150 m3 tank full in condition. This has resulted into SAP 2000 finite element software. The analysis of response reduction factor (R) value was done under three different soil conditions i.e. soft soil properties, medium soil properties, and hard soil properties. Response reduction factor (R) values indicate that R.C. elevated rectangular water tank structure without soil properties behaves quite the one value as per codal provisions.

scholarly journals Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods Based on Inelastic Design Spectrum

1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 637-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil K. Chopra ◽  
Rakesh K. Goel
Keyword(s):  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Improved Method ◽  
Strength Reduction Factor ◽  
Diagram Method ◽  
Ductility Demand ◽  
Design Spectrum ◽  
Important Sense ◽  
Nonlinear Static Procedure ◽  
Nonlinear Static ◽  
Inelastic Design

An improved capacity-demand-diagram method that uses the well-known constant-ductility design spectrum for the demand diagram is developed and illustrated by examples. This method estimates the deformation of inelastic SDF systems consistent with the selected inelastic design spectrum, while retaining the attraction of graphical implementation of the ATC-40 Nonlinear Static Procedure. One version of the improved method is graphically similar to ATC-40 Procedure A whereas the second version is graphically similar to ATC-40 Procedure B. However, the improved procedures differ from ATC-40 procedures in one important sense. The demand diagram used is different: the constant-ductility demand diagram for inelastic systems in the improved procedure versus the elastic demand diagram in ATC-40 for equivalent linear systems. The improved method can be conveniently implemented numerically if its graphical features are not important to the user. Such a procedure, based on equations relating the yield strength reduction factor, Ry, and ductility factor, μ, for different period, Tn, ranges, has been presented, and illustrated by examples using three different Ry - μ - Tn relations.

Evaluation of R-Factor for 5 Storey RC Frame (IMRF) Building

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Kushwah ◽  
Aditya Kushwah ◽  
Aditya Kushwah
Keyword(s):  
Mode Shape ◽  
Fundamental Mode ◽  
Lateral Displacement ◽  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Rc Frame ◽  
Response Reduction Factor ◽  
R Factor ◽  
Frame Building ◽  
Rc Frame Buildings

According to IS 1893 part 1 (2016), the philosophy of earthquake resistant structures allows for some damages and inelastic lateral displacement in the structure for energy dissipation during an earthquake. The non-linear behaviour of elements in the structure plays a crucial role in earthquake resistance. There are three detailed classes for distinct seismic zones in different national codes. In India, the draught IS 13920 advocated the usage of IMRF (intermediate moment resisting frame) in zones II and III. The 5 story IMRF is designed and detailed as per IS 1893 (part 1) 2016, IS 13920 (2016), IS 1893 draft, IS 13920 draft, IS 456 (2000). In addition, nonlinear static pushover analysis was performed on IMRF and SMRF RC frame buildings in accordance with FEMA 356. (Displacement Coefficient method) During the analysis, two distinct load patterns (i) parabolic as per IS 1893 (part 1) 2016 (ii) fundamental mode shape are utilised, and the influence of p-delta is also taken into account when evaluating the response reduction factor. The analysed R-factor for studied frame building for fundamental mode shape loading was found to be near to the initial estimated R-factor during the design.

scholarly journals Application of DDBD and FBD Methodology for 8-Story RC Frame Using IS 1893 Spectra

10.29007/m72w ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunjan D. Gamit ◽  
Jignesh A. Amin
Keyword(s):  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Rc Frame ◽  
Base Shear ◽  
Response Reduction Factor ◽  
Capacity Curves ◽  
Direct Displacement Based Design ◽  
Effective Period ◽  
Frame Building ◽  
Rc Frame Building

This study investigates the direct displacement based design (DDBD) and convectional force based design (FBD) approach for 8 storey RC frame building in DDBD methodology the displacement profile is calculated and the given MDOF is converted to equivalent single degree of freedom system. After calculating the effective period, secant stiffness, and viscous damping of the equivalent structure, the base shear is obtained, based on which the design and detailing process can be carried out. The designed frames as per DDBD and FBD approach are then analyzed using nonlinear pushover analysis to obtain the capacity curves and response reduction factor. Results of the analysis and comparison of ‘R’ factor indicate the efficiency of the DDBD approach for RC frame buildings

scholarly journals Response Reduction Factor for Mansory Buildings

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-203
Author(s):  
Jagat Kumar Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Analytical Models ◽  
Elastic Response ◽  
Masonry Building ◽  
Masonry Buildings ◽  
Response Reduction Factor ◽  
Nonlinear Static ◽  
Static Pushover Analysis ◽  
Nonlinear Static Pushover Analysis

Most of the seismic codes used today incorporate the nonlinear response of a structure by providing an appropriate response reduction factor so that a linear elastic force-based approach can be used in designs. This study focuses on evaluating the response reduction factor for masonry buildings with different mechanical properties, which are used in modern codes to scale down the elastic response of the structure. Using a similar frame-approach, a nonlinear static pushover analysis is carried out on the analytical models of masonry building in finite element analysis software SAP2000v20.0.0. The response reduction factor components, flexibility, and over strength were computed from the results obtained from the nonlinear static pushover analysis. Finally, the response reduction factor is evaluated for different masonry buildings. It is concluded that the R-value given in IS: 1893-2016 for unreinforced masonry is not recommended for random rubble stonemasonry buildings in mud mortar.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document