scholarly journals Effect of Ceramic Brush Treatment on the Surface Quality and Edge Condition of Aluminium Alloy after Abrasive Waterjet Machining

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-263
Author(s):  
Jakub Matuszak
Keyword(s):  
Aluminium Alloy ◽  
Surface Quality ◽  
Abrasive Waterjet ◽  
Edge Condition ◽  
Abrasive Waterjet Machining ◽  
Waterjet Machining

scholarly journals Impacts of Traverse Speed and Material Thickness on Abrasive Waterjet Contour Cutting of Austenitic Stainless Steel AISI 304L

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 4925
Author(s):  
Jennifer Milaor Llanto ◽  
Majid Tolouei-Rad ◽  
Ana Vafadar ◽  
Muhammad Aamir
Keyword(s):  
Material Removal Rate ◽  
Material Removal ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Traverse Speed ◽  
Abrasive Waterjet ◽  
Taper Angle ◽  
Material Thickness ◽  
Abrasive Waterjet Machining ◽  
Kerf Taper ◽  
Waterjet Machining

Abrasive water jet machining is a proficient alternative for cutting difficult-to-machine materials with complex geometries, such as austenitic stainless steel 304L (AISI304L). However, due to differences in machining responses for varied material conditions, the abrasive waterjet machining experiences challenges including kerf geometric inaccuracy and low material removal rate. In this study, an abrasive waterjet machining is employed to perform contour cutting of different profiles to investigate the impacts of traverse speed and material thickness in achieving lower kerf taper angle and higher material removal rate. Based on experimental investigation, a trend of decreasing the level of traverse speed and material thickness that results in minimum kerf taper angle values of 0.825° for machining curvature profile and 0.916° for line profiles has been observed. In addition, higher traverse speed and material thickness achieved higher material removal rate in cutting different curvature radii and lengths in line profiles with obtained values of 769.50 mm3/min and 751.5 mm3/min, accordingly. The analysis of variance revealed that material thickness had a significant impact on kerf taper angle and material removal rate, contributing within the range of 69–91% and 62–69%, respectively. In contrast, traverse speed was the least factor measuring within the range of 5–18% for kerf taper angle and 27–36% for material removal rate.

Abrasive Waterjet Cutting of Aluminum Alloys: Workpiece Surface Roughness

2013 ◽  
Vol 404 ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nihat Tosun ◽  
Ihsan Dagtekin ◽  
Latif Ozler ◽  
Ahmet Deniz
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Abrasive Waterjet ◽  
Traditional Methods ◽  
Workpiece Surface ◽  
Abrasive Waterjet Machining ◽  
Waterjet Machining ◽  
Area Of Application ◽  
Better Than

Abrasive waterjet machining is one of the non-traditional methods of the recent years which found itself a wide area of application in the industry for machining of different materials. In this paper, the surface roughness of 6061-T6 and 7075-T6 aluminum alloys are being cut with abrasive waterjet is examined experimentally. The experiments were conducted with different waterjet pressures and traverse speeds. It has been found that the surface roughness obtained by cutting material with high mechanical properties is better than that of obtained by cutting material with inferior mechanical properties.

Effect of abrasive waterjet machining on LaPO4/Y2O3 ceramic matrix composite

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Balamurugan ◽  
M. Uthayakumar ◽  
S. Sankar ◽  
U. S. Hareesh ◽  
K. G. K. Warrier
Keyword(s):  
Matrix Composite ◽  
Ceramic Matrix Composite ◽  
Ceramic Matrix ◽  
Abrasive Waterjet ◽  
Abrasive Waterjet Machining ◽  
Waterjet Machining
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document