Dynamic Inventory Management with Learning About the Demand Distribution and Substitution Probability

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Chen ◽  
Erica L. Plambeck
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Wanke ◽  
Víctor Leiva

Choosing the suitable demand distribution during lead-time is an important issue in inventory models. Much research has explored the advantage of following a distributional assumption different from the normality. The Birnbaum-Saunders (BS) distribution is a probabilistic model that has its genesis in engineering but is also being widely applied to other fields including business, industry, and management. We conduct numeric experiments using the R statistical software to assess the adequacy of the BS distribution against the normal and gamma distributions in light of the traditional lot size-reorder point inventory model, known as (Q,r). The BS distribution is well-known to be robust to extreme values; indeed, results indicate that it is a more adequate assumption under higher values of the lead-time demand coefficient of variation, thus outperforming the gamma and the normal assumptions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nai-Ru Xu ◽  
Jie Cheng ◽  
Zheng-Qun Cai

When manufacturers construct a dual-channel distribution system, which includes online and offline sales channels, they need to solve the inventory management problem to ensure supply and reduce inventory costs of the supply chain system. The dual-channel supply chain is the research object, and the inventory decision model is designed to achieve optimal profit when market demand is divided into online and offline demands. The results of the numerical analysis and simulations, conducted using MATLAB, indicate that both the manufacturer and the retailer increase their inventories and that their profits decrease when demand uncertainty increases. Besides, the increase in the online demand ratio causes the increase in the manufacturer’s inventory and reduces the profits of the retailer and the entire supply chain.


Author(s):  
Chi-on Chan ◽  
Owen Liu ◽  
Ricky Szeto

The mismatch between supply and demand always exists within the supply chain and among retail stores. This situation is even worse for SMEs who work without state-of-the-art technologies, especially in terms of quantitative demand and size distribution in fashion industry. In this paper, we develop a cloud computing and smart device (CCSD) model to address the stochastic deviation between supply and demand. A computational experiment proves that the performance of inventory management in the supply chain and among retail stores can be significantly improved by application of CCSD, irrespective of demand and size distribution. In this paper, we illustrate its benefits for both normal and right-skewed demand distribution. We find that different stages in supply chain can also be coordinated by using the CCSD platform. The results show that using all-channel communication network through CCSD increases the information sharing performance.


Author(s):  
Bibhas Chandra Giri

In the traditional inventory management literature, it is a quite common assumption that the probability distribution of stochastic demand is completely known to the decision maker. However, in reality, there are ample evidences where the demand distribution is not known with certainty. In order to cope with the practical situation, it is, therefore, necessary to investigate inventory models with available incomplete information. This chapter is aimed to study a simple single-period newsboy problem in which the decision maker is risk-averse and the demand information is not perfectly known to him/her. We derive a forecast cost for the period based on sample observation used to set the value of an unknown parameter of the distribution. We analyze the significance of risk aversion on the optimal decisions. From numerical study, we observe that the expected forecast cost increases when less information about demand is available and that the risk-averse inventory manager incurs higher cost than risk-neutral manager.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Jancuk ◽  
D. Nargis ◽  
R. Collipi

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 204-210
Author(s):  
Azim Mohammad Mohammad ◽  
Shibbir Ahmad ◽  
Mohammad Iqbal ◽  
Md. Alauddin

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 386-389
Author(s):  
Dr. K. Sadasivan Dr. K. Sadasivan ◽  
◽  
S. Kavitha S. Kavitha ◽  
Britto A Britto A

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document