Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProTaper next versus ProTaper Universal

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Abeer A. Elhakim El-Gendy ◽  
Mohamed Mokhtar Nagy
Keyword(s):  
Canal Transportation

scholarly journals Comparison of Apical Transportation, Centering Ability and Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Four Rotary File Systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 012-019
Author(s):  
Ankita Sood ◽  
Varun Jindal ◽  
Ajay Chhabra ◽  
Arvind Arora ◽  
Ankur Vats
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Resistance ◽  
Fatigue Testing ◽  
File Systems ◽  
Cyclic Fatigue ◽  
Root Canal Preparation ◽  
Maxillary Molars ◽  
Apical Transportation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Canal Transportation

Abstract Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical transportation, centering ability and cyclic fatigue resistance of Hero shaper, Twisted file, Hyflex file and RACE rotary file systems. Methods: Mesiobuccal roots of eighty maxillary molars were divided into four groups and instrumented with Hero shaper, Twisted file, Hyflex file and RACE rotary file systems with a final apical size being 25/.04. Apical deviation was assessed by the radiographic platform method that enables obtaining superimposed images of the first and last instrument used in root canal preparation in the same radiograph. Apical transportation was measured in millimeters with the aid of the AUTOCAD 2008 software. Forty canals were sectioned at 7mm from the apex and stereomicroscopic Images were taken at 6x magnification before and after instrumentation for evaluation of centering ability. The cyclic fatigue testing was conducted with the instrumentrotating freely at angles of curvature of 45 degree. Total 10 instruments were tested in each group. The instruments were rotated at 400rpm using the X-smart motor (Dentsply, Maillefer) until fracture occurred. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups in apical transportation and centering ability whereas twisted files showed the maximum cyclic fatigue resistance. Conclusion: The different rotary file systems provided minimum canal transportation and the twisted file performed significantly better in terms of cyclic fatigue resistance.

scholarly journals Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) Evaluation of Effects of Different Rotary Glide Path Techniques on Canal Transportation and Centering in Curved Root Canals

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 6351-6358
Author(s):  
Gabrielė Česaitienė ◽  
Tadas Venskutonis ◽  
Vita Mačiulskienė ◽  
Vaidotas Cicėnas ◽  
Vykintas Samaitis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Micro Ct ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Glide Path ◽  
Ct Evaluation ◽  
Canal Transportation ◽  
Curved Root Canals

scholarly journals Comparison of Air-driven vs Electric Torque Control Motors on Canal Centering Ability by ProTaper NiTi Rotary Instruments

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina Zarei ◽  
Maryam Javidi ◽  
Mahdi Erfanian ◽  
Mahdi Lomee ◽  
Farzaneh Afkhami
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sections ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Torque Control ◽  
Rotary Instruments ◽  
Canal Transportation ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Niti Rotary Instruments

ABSTRACT Aim Cleaning and shaping is one of the most important phases in root canal therapy. Various rotary NiTi systems minimize accidents and facilitate the shaping process. Todays NiTi files are used with air-driven and electric handpieces. This study compared the canal centering after instrumentation using the ProTaper system using Endo IT, electric torque-control motor, and NSK air-driven handpiece. Materials and methods This ex vivo randomized controlled trial study involved 26 mesial mandibular root canals with 10 to 35° curvature. The roots were randomly divided into 2 groups of 13 canals each. The roots were mounted in an endodontic cube with acrylic resin, sectioned horizontally at 2, 6 and 10 mm from the apex and then reassembled. The canals were instrumented according to the manufacturer's instructions using ProTaper rotary files and electric torque-control motors (group 1) or air-driven handpieces (group 2). Photographs of the cross-sections included shots before and after instrumentation, and image analysis was performed using Photoshop software. The centering ability and canal transportation was also evaluated. Repeated measurement and independent t-test provided statistical analysis of canal transportation. Results The comparison of the rate of transportation toward internal or external walls between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.62). Comparison of the rate of transportation of sections within one group was not significant (p = 0.28). Conclusion Use of rotary NiTi file with either electric torquecontrol motor or air-driven handpiece had no effect on canal centering. Clinical significance NiTi rotary instruments can be used with air-driven motors without any considerable changes in root canal anatomy, however it needs the clinician to be expert. How to cite this article Zarei M, Javidi M, Erfanian M, Lomee M, Afkhami F. Comparison of Air-driven vs Electric Torque Control Motors on Canal Centering Ability by ProTaper NiTi Rotary Instruments. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(1):71-75.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of trunatomy and protaper gold files in curved canals using cone?beam computed tomography: An invitro study

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-105
Author(s):  
Kadam Krutika Kiran ◽  
Vagarali Hemant ◽  
Pujar Madhu A ◽  
Tamase Aishwarya S ◽  
Sahana Umesh
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Canal Transportation ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Shaping Ability

This study aimed to compare the canal transportation and canal centering ability in the preparation of curved root canals after instrumentation with TruNatomy (TN) (TN; Dentsply Sirona, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and ProTaper Gold (PG) (PG; Dentsply, Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK, USA) files using cone‑beam computed tomography (CBCT). 30 Single rooted extracted human teeth with root curvature ranging from 20-30° according to Schneider’s method were selected. Teeth with any visible cracks or fractures, calcifications, previous root canal treatments were excluded. The teeth were randomly assigned into two groups i.e. Group 1-TN and Group 2-PG (n = 15 each). The teeth were instrumented according to manufacturer’s guidelines for both the groups. Canals were scanned using a CBCT scanner before and after preparation to evaluate the transportation and centering ratio at 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm from the apex. The data analysis was done using SPSS software and the test used was independent sample t test for comparison between the 2 groups.Data obtained suggested that TN group presented lesser canal transportation at the middle third of the root. The PG group showed better centering abitily at apical third of the root canal when both the groups were compared. TN resulted in less transportation than PG at the middle third, and PG showed better centering ability at the apical third. Overall, both systems safely prepared root canals, causing minimal errors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document