Debate on Rationality and Legitimacy of “House-for-Pension” Pension Model Use in People’s Republic of China

10.12737/6732 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Вэйдун ◽  
Cyuy Veydun ◽  
Хунтин ◽  
Yan Hongting
Keyword(s):  
Pension System ◽  
People’S Republic Of China ◽  
Pension Scheme ◽  
Chinese Society ◽  
People's Republic Of China ◽  
Similar Model ◽  
Reverse Mortgage ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
Budget Support ◽  
The Future

“House-for-pension” scheme also known as reverse mortgage is used in many countries nowadays. An interest to this model is increasing in Chinese society too. But is “house-for-pension” scheme really suitable for China? In the present paper possible options related to "house for pension" scheme adaptation to the Chinese conditions have been analyzed, and a conclusion that the similar model doesn´t suit China has been drawn. Chinese pension system still needs for state budget support as a main source of financing, and for using of traditional pension provision. “House-for-pension” scheme will be able become a supplement source of financing only in the future.

WINDOW TO EUROPE: 16+1 THE FUTURE FOR UKRAINE

2018 ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
O. V. Demianchuk
Keyword(s):  
Eastern Europe ◽  
Central And Eastern Europe ◽  
Systems Integration ◽  
People’S Republic Of China ◽  
People's Republic Of China ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
The Future

In article the condition of the existing cooperation and the prospect of development of the relations of the People's Republic of China with the states of Central and Eastern Europe in the 16 + 1 format within forming geopolitical and  systems, integration processes in Eurasia which China creates around itself in the form of the New Silk way. The main ways and possibilities of cooperation of Ukraine in the 16 + 1 format are defined. Conclusions are drawn and the corresponding recommendations are made.

China’s urban-rural relationship: evolution and prospects

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenghe Zhang ◽  
Yawen Lu
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
People’S Republic Of China ◽  
People's Republic Of China ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
The Future ◽  
Urban Rural ◽  
Urban And Rural Areas ◽  
Reform And Opening Up ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose In the 69 years since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, especially the 40 years since the reform and opening-up, the relationship between urban and rural areas has undergone profound change. When the deepening reform of the urban-rural relationship is entering a critical period, it is necessary to reassess the evolution of the urban-rural relationship in China and draw a picture for that relationship in the future. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This paper combs the policies on the urban and rural development since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, and analyzes macro data on the industries, population, personal income, and other aspects. Findings The study found that this urbanism affects individuals’ lives and the choices of society through the will of the state, and then provides feedback at the whole level of social values. Originality/value This paper divides the evolution of China’s urban-rural relationship into two major stages – nurturing cities with rural areas and leading rural areas with cities, which are then subdivided into five periods. The features of the relationship between the urban and rural areas in different periods are analyzed, and the future development of urban-rural relations is also considered.

China's Foreign Relations: The Long March, Future Uncertain

1999 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 650-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Yahuda
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Relations ◽  
50Th Anniversary ◽  
Foreign Affairs ◽  
People’S Republic Of China ◽  
People's Republic Of China ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
The Future ◽  
International Standing

As we mark the 50th anniversary of the People's Republic of China (PRC) we have the opportunity to assess China's experience over five decades in accommodating itself to the outside world. It is an opportunity to take stock and to consider in the light of this experience what is China's current international standing and what may be said to be its agenda for the future with regard to the conduct of foreign affairs.

Pastoral Psychology and Care in the People's Republic of China

1986 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-380
Author(s):  
Howard Clinebell
Keyword(s):  
Pastoral Care ◽  
Pastoral Psychology ◽  
People’S Republic Of China ◽  
Chinese Society ◽  
People's Republic Of China ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
Care Givers ◽  
Care Giving ◽  
The Two Cultures ◽  
The Church

Reports on a two-week study tour of The People's Republic of China designed to learn about care-giving practices in the church and the wider Chinese society and to identify possible ways of increasing collaboration between Chinese and Western care-givers. Offers observations and opinions on the historic and contemporary differences between the two cultures in a variety of areas— e.g. modes of doing pastoral care, shame versus guilt cultures, social justice and treatment of women, holistic tendencies in thinking—and opines that despite wide differences there are good possibilities for future communication and collaboration between the pastoral care deliverers of the two societies.

The Future of U.S.-China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?

2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron L. Friedberg
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Relations ◽  
The United States ◽  
People’S Republic Of China ◽  
People's Republic Of China ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
Causal Mechanisms ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Relationship

What is likely to be the future character of the relationship between the United States and the People's Republic of China? Will it be marked by convergence toward deepening cooperation, stability, and peace or by deterioration that leads to increasingly open competition and perhaps even war? The answers to these questions are of enormous importance. They are also, at this point, unknown. Most analysts who write on U.S.-China relations deploy arguments derived from the three main camps in contemporary international relations theorizing: realism, liberalism, and constructivism. Those whose basic analytical premises place them in one of these three schools, however, do not necessarily have similar views regarding the speciac question of the future of U.S.-China relations. It is possible to identify realists who believe that the relationship will basically be stable and peaceful, liberals who expect confrontation and confict, and constructivists who think that things could go either way. The six basic positions in this debate all rest on claims about the importance of particular causal mechanisms or sets of similarly aligned causal forces. In reality, one set of forces may turn out to be so powerful as to overwhelm the rest. But it is also conceivable that the future will be shaped by a confuence of different forces, some mutually reinforcing and others opposed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document