Fiscal (Tax) Sovereignty and Its Scope in Integration Bodies

10.12737/1206 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 41-51
Author(s):  
Инна Хаванова ◽  
Inna Khavanova
Keyword(s):  
Tax Law ◽  

The author analyses the matter of the fiscal (tax) sovereignty, tax jurisdiction, tax competition of the states, defines trends in development of the tax sovereignty and its borders in the course of integration. The article reveals some problems of the interaction of the international and national tax law.

Percurso ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (30) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Frabriccio Petreli TAROSSO

RESUMOO presente artigo pretende aproximar alguns conceitos da novel Lei de Introdução às Normas do Direito Brasileiro – LINDB ao princípio da não-surpresa aplicável ao processo tributário, seja ele Administrativo ou Judicial. A Lei Federal n. 13.655 de 25/04/2018 houve por incluir no Decreto-Lei nº 4.657, de 4 de setembro de 1942 - Lei de Introdução às Normas do Direito Brasileiro - disposições sobre segurança jurídica e eficiência na criação e na aplicação do direito público. Deste modo, muitas dúvidas têm surgido acerca da convivência entre a regra geral de direito tributário, inserta no Art. 144 do Código Tributário Nacional, de que a lei vigente à época dos fatos geradores deve ser levada em conta ao deslinde de uma questão e que a jurisprudência majoritária à época dos mesmos fatos – se modificada – não deve servir de parâmetro para a tomada das decisões. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Lei de Introdução às Normas do Direito Brasileiro – LINDB; Princípio Processual da não-surpresa.ABSTRACTThe present article intends to approximate some concepts of the novel Law of Introduction to the Norms of Brazilian Law - LINDB to the principle of non-surprise applicable to the tax process, be it Administrative or Judicial. Federal Law n. 13,655 dated 04/25/2018, there was a need to include in Decree-Law No. 4.657, dated September 4, 1942 - Law on Introduction to the Rules of Brazilian Law - provisions on legal certainty and efficiency in the creation and application of public law. In this way, many doubts have arisen about the coexistence between the general rule of tax law, inserted in Article 144 of the National Tax Code, that the law in force at the time of the generating facts must be taken into account in the definition of an issue and that the majority case-law at the time of the same facts - if modified - should not serve as a parameter for decision-making. The study will have as a method the legal and bibliographical research on the subject.KEYWORDS: Law of Introduction to the Norms of Brazilian Law – LINDB; Procedural Principle of Non-Surpris


Teisė ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 141-159
Author(s):  
M Indaugas Lukas

Straipsnyje analizuojama tarpvalstybinė konkurencija tiesioginiais mokesčiais, tipinės jos formos ir vals­tybių taikomi būdai riboti neigiamus konkurencijos mokesčiais padarinius nacionalinėms mokestinėms pajamoms, siekiant atskleisti, jog konkurencijos mokesčiais fenomenas, nepaisant itin aiškaus politi­zuotumo, gali ir turi būti ir teisės mokslo interesų sritis. Suvokiant, kad išsami teisinė šio itin sudėtingo ir daugialypio reiškinio ar jį identifikuojančių elementų analizė tokios apimties darbe neįmanoma, čia bandoma iš teisinių perspektyvų įvertinti aktualiausius ir reikšmingiausius nacionalinėms mokesčių sis­temoms tiesiogiai darančius įtaką valstybių konkurencijai mokesčiais aspektus, bandant prisidėti prie kryptingos tolesnės teisinės diskusijos. In this article phenomenon of international tax competition, typical its forms and measures to counter its harmful effects on national tax revenues are analyzed, trying to reveal, that, despite deep political nature, international tax competition might and should be in the scope of interests of tax lawyers. Real­izing, that in such article it is not possible to provide comprehensive legal analysis, author seeks in legal light to introduce relevant and most important aspects of tax competition phenomenon that directly influences national tax systems, trying to encourage further legal discussion.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Willner

Secondments form an essential link between domestic and foreign group companies. Thus, the taxation of secondments affects both the employee and employer as well as several tax jurisdictions. This results in a considerable complexity of the taxation of secondments, which in turn creates various tax risks for all parties involved. The thesis systematically presents the taxation consequences of secondments, embeds them in an overarching economic and legal framework, and critically evaluates various norms of national tax law and treaty law.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 857-874
Author(s):  
Saffie G. Francisco

Neoliberal tax policies at the local and the global levels risk democracy consolidating economic inequality by allowing and fostering capital accumulation. As a consequence capital owners have increased their political power to influence and decide on local and global tax policies for their own benefit. The Chilean income tax system and the international tax law system (including tax competition among states and tax heavens) are analysed as examples of neoliberal tax policies at the local and the global level, respectively. At the same time, neoliberalism as a normative order of reason has replaced the political aspect of taxation with economic concepts that tend to dissolve the connection between taxes and solidarity. In this scenario, taxes make no economic or political sense as they are not understood as duties of citizenship. In this Article, recent alternatives proposed to diminish global no taxation and inequality, as the OECD BEPS project and Thomas Piketty's proposal for a global tax on capital are analyzed and criticized.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 71-81
Author(s):  
Karina Ponomareva

Subject. The principles of subsidiarity proportionality, which serve as the basic principles fordetermining the competence of integration associations, are considered in the article.Aim. The aim of this paper is to analyse the place and the importance of Member States’ obligationsderiving from the EU legal order in order to address the relationships between EU lawand national tax law, as well as to analyse the practice of using of principles of subsidiarity andproportionality by the highest courts of the Russian Federation as a federal state.Methodology. The author uses methods of theoretical analysis, particularly the theory ofintegrative legal consciousness, as well as legal methods, including formal legal method andcomparative law.Results, scope. The exercise of power by the European Union in the areas of shared competencemust respect the principle of subsidiarity. The founding Treaties make clear thatsubsidiarity is a legal enforceable legal principle. However. the case law of the EuropeanCourt of Justice reveals that the enforcement of subsidiarity as a judicial principle has beenineffective.The article examines cross-border loss relief for group companies in the context of EuropeanUnion law and considers how this has affected Member States such as the UK. Thecase law of the Court of Justice is then analysed in an attempt to assess whether some ofthe principles set out in these legislative initiatives found their way to Member State lawsthrough the Court's jurisprudence. Following this, the judicial and legislative response tothe Marks & Spencer judgment in the UK are critically assessed.The practical suggestions are looking at developing EU compatible tax principles to be appliedto cross-border taxation within the EU.Having considered the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality in the context of interactionbetween integration and national tax law, the author suggests directions for improvingthe practice of integration tax law. The supranational judicial authority should dwell onthe position that only those differences that are directly based on the origin of the incomeor nationality of the taxpayer can be justified on the basis of restrictions on fundamentalfreedoms.Conclusions. The author comes to the conclusion that a co-ordinated approach to crossborder tax is essential. The effectiveness of integration tax law will largely depend on how the ratio of the norms of integration and national law in the tax jurisdiction of the Union and member states will be formed. However, historically direct tax has been viewed by Member States as central to national sovereignty.


Skola biznisa ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 137-161
Author(s):  
Ljiljana Tanasić ◽  
Teodor Petrović

The paper focuses on elucidating transfer pricing as a means of tax competition instruments misuse. Tax competition instruments have a key role in creating national tax attractiveness for foreign direct investment. However, in order to protect the local tax base on the basis of abuse of tax competition instruments, a large number of countries apply the principle of sources of income, i.e. taxation of business profits made by a non-resident legal entity exclusively in the country where the business was conducted and revenue generated. But with the process of globalization and the expansion of multinational companies, i.e. related legal entities, the instruments of tax competition have remained a suitable area of legally permitted transfer of profits through the application of transfer pricing. The data presented in the paper indicate that, although the trend of global corporate tax rate (as the dominant instrument of tax competition) has a downward trajectory, there are still fluctuations in rates between countries around the world, including the existing inconsistencies and ambiguities of national tax regulations. Taking this into account, the aim of the paper was to emphasize that transfer prices, through the instruments of tax competition, have threatened the economic, social, and tax stability of individual countries for more than two decades. The paper shows that developed countries have managed, to a certain extent, to gain control over their application by introducing more aggressive tax audits of transfer pricing. However, special attention is paid to developing countries which remain an active source of tax competition instruments abuse through the inadequate application of transfer pricing, due to the lack of adequate regulatory and control mechanisms, financial and human resources, and efforts to attract foreign investment through various instruments of tax competition.


Author(s):  
Оксана Журавлева ◽  
Oksana Zhuravleva

In the beginning of the XXI century constitutions of countries changed frequently. Tax matter was involved in the search of the balance between private and public interests. The taxation models vested in national constitutional acts were transformed. This article deals with the main tendencies in the constitutional design of different countries in the framework of tax matter. Author investigates the provisions connected with taxation, which were enacted in new constitutions in XXI century. Some traditional rules of different legislations’ branches (tax, budget, criminal law) are now becoming embodied in the new constitutional acts. In the explored constitutions the main tendencies, which were revealed, are the constitutionalisation of national tax law and the formation of the new tax principles. The wide variety of the tax regulation on the constitutional level was revealed. It is concluded that the approaches to the realization of the main taxation principles in new constitutional acts were transformed in XXI century.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document