scholarly journals Predictive validity of the Identification of Seniors at Risk - Hospitalized Patient tool foridentifying functional decline

2017 ◽  
Vol IV Série (Nº15) ◽  
pp. 145-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Tavares ◽  
Joana Grácio ◽  
Lisa Nunes
1994 ◽  
Vol 23 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P18-P18
Author(s):  
R. HEbert ◽  
G. Bravo ◽  
N. Korner-Bitensky ◽  
L. Voyer

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marni D. Brownell ◽  
Mariette Chartier ◽  
Robert Santos ◽  
Wendy Au ◽  
Noralou P. Roos ◽  
...  

A newborn screen designed to predict family risk was examined to: (a) determine whether all families with newborns were screened; (b) evaluate its predictive validity for identifying risk of out-of-home placement, as a proxy for maltreatment; (c) determine which items were most predictive of out-of-home placement. All infants born in Manitoba, Canada from 2000 to 2002 were followed until March 31, 2004 ( N = 40,886) by linking four population-based data sets: (a) newborn screening data on biological, psychological, and social risks; (b) population registry data on demographics; (c) hospital discharge data on newborn birth records; (d) data on children entering out-of-home care. Of the study population, 18.4% were not screened and 3.0% were placed in out-of-home care at least once during the study period. Infants not screened were twice as likely to enter care compared to those screened (4.9% vs. 2.5%). Infants screening at risk were 15 times more likely to enter care than those screening “not at risk.” Sensitivity and specificity of the screen were 77.6% and 83.3%, respectively. Screening efforts to identify vulnerable families missed a substantial portion of families needing support. The screening tool demonstrated moderate predictive validity for identifying children at risk of entering care in the first years of life.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Salvi ◽  
Valeria Morichi ◽  
Annalisa Grilli ◽  
Liana Spazzafumo ◽  
Raffaella Giorgi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-273
Author(s):  
Charles H Van Wijk

In the South African context, resource constraints often preclude the comprehensive assessment of large numbers of people for the likelihood of Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Primary screening through a self-report measure may be useful to stream at-risk individuals towards diagnostic assessment services, as well as being useful in population and workplace based research. The present study set out, first, to investigate the usefulness of a self-report ADHD scale to identify at-risk individuals, and, second, to provide preliminary prevalence estimates for Adult ADHD, guided by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) criteria, in a South African workplace sample. Workers in full-time skilled employment ( N = 1,917), aged 18–44, completed a self-report Adult ADHD scale, and participated in an interview with a psychologist. Their scale data, using three different scoring and interpretation systems, were subjected to statistical analysis. Favourable internal reliability and positive predictive validity were found. Different interpretation systems provided different prevalence estimations: using DSM-5 criteria, a total prevalence estimate of 3.3 % was calculated (attention deficit subtype = 0.9%, hyperactivity-impulsivity subtype = 1.0%, and combined subtype = 1.4%). The positive predictive validity found with this sample suggests that this scale can be used constructively in research or screening contexts to identify at-risk individuals. Furthermore, preliminary prevalence estimates for Adult ADHD, guided by DSM-5 criteria, are now available for a South African workplace sample.


2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 493-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Bechdolf ◽  
Aswin Ratheesh ◽  
Sue M Cotton ◽  
Barnaby Nelson ◽  
Andrew M Chanen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document