scholarly journals FDG-PET/CT-based Gross Tumor Volume Contouring for Radiation Therapy Planning: An Experimental Phantom Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo TOYA ◽  
Ryuji MURAKAMI ◽  
Kuniyuki TASHIRO ◽  
Morikatsu YOSHIDA ◽  
Fumi SAKAMOTO ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. S642-S643
Author(s):  
C. Christensen ◽  
C. Hollensen ◽  
E. Markova ◽  
P. Munck af Rosenschold ◽  
M. Aznar ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Percy Lee ◽  
Patrick Kupelian ◽  
Johannes Czernin ◽  
Partha Ghosh

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. S228
Author(s):  
S. Córdoba Largo ◽  
J. Corona Sánchez ◽  
M. Vázquez Masedo ◽  
P. Alcántara Carrió ◽  
A. Doval González ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Keeratikarn Boonyawan ◽  
Sasipilai Naivikul ◽  
Putipun Puataweepong ◽  
Wichana Chamroonrat ◽  
Thiti Swangsilpa ◽  
...  

Objective: The correlation between 18F-fluorodexyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) based-tumor volumes is unclear. This prospective study was conducted to determine the optimal threshold of PET/CT for gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation using 4DCT as the standard reference for locally advanced lung cancer patients.Material and Methods: Ten patients with histologically proven primary lung cancer who underwent radiotherapy fromJune 2017 to March 2018 in Ramathibodi Hospital were enrolled in the study. The 4DCT simulation and 18F-FDG PET/CT simulation were performed on the same position and same date. Eight standard uptake value (SUV) thresholds of SUV 1.5.0-2.0 and 15.0-35.0% of maximum SUV were selected for contouring in order to be compared with 4DCT based tumor volumes. The comparison methods used were the mean percentage volume change, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and 3D-centroid shift of the targets between 18F-FDG PET/CT-based gross tumor volume (GTVPET) and internal gross tumor volume (IGTV) from 4DCT.Results: The largest and smallest volume of primary tumors were 422.6 cm3 and 5.9 cm3. GTVPET contoured using SUV 1.5 (GTVPET1.5) approximated closely to IGTV in all the parameters, including volume change, DSC, and 3D-centroid shift. The best median percentage volume change, median DSC, and median centroid shift between IGTV and GTVPET1.5 were 5.55, 0.745 and 0.37, respectively.Conclusion: GTVPET contoured by 18F-FDG PET at SUV1.5 corresponded most closely to the IGTV in all parameters. Further study with a larger sample size and clinical outcome analysis is needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Toya ◽  
Tomohiko Matsuyama ◽  
Tetsuo Saito ◽  
Masanori Imuta ◽  
Shinya Shiraishi ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15090-15090
Author(s):  
J. M. Yu ◽  
X. J. Zhong ◽  
B. J. Zhang ◽  
D. B. Mu ◽  
A. Q. Han ◽  
...  

15090 Background: Although results of clinical studies have demonstrated FDG PET/CT improved target volume delineation in various tumors, only few studies compared delineation based on PET/CT with pathologic examination. Aim of our study was to compare anatomic imaging modalities including computed tomography (CT), esophagram, endoscopy with FDG PET/CT for delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) in esophageal carcinoma and to validate the results with the pathologic examination. Methods: Thirty patients with stages II-III squamous cell carcinoma underwent transthoracic esophagectomy were enrolled. PET/CT, esophagram and endoscopy were performed with patients before operations. The length of the lesion on the PET/CT scan and on the CT portion of the PET/CT and the PET scan alone was determined independently by 3 separate investigative groups. PET/CT scan was evaluated by visual inspection for abnormality. A standard uptake value (SUV) of 2.5 was used in the PET scan to delineate the tumor extent. The lengths of GTVs determined with the five modalities (PET/CT, PET, CT, esophagram and endoscopy) were compared quantitatively and validated with the pathologic specimen. The sizes of the tumors were measured by pathologic examination which was considered as the gold standard. Results: Of the 30 patients, 9 had T2 tumors, 20 had T3 tumors and 1 had T4 tumor with an involvement of pleura. Three tumors were located at the upper esophagus, 14 at the middle esophagus, 13 at the lower esophagus. The mean length of the carcinoma was 5.85cm(SD 2.50cm) measured by pathologic examination, 5.79cm (SD 2.04cm) as determined by PET scan, 5.14cm (SD 1.65cm) by PET/CT scan, 5.42 cm(SD 2.42cm)by CT scan, 5.50cm(SD 2.79cm) by endoscopy, and 6.07cm(SD 2.75cm) by esophagram respectively. Although the lengths of the tumors as measured by the five imaging modalities were no significant difference, the result of PET was the most accurate. Conclusions: Compared with tumor lengths measured by pathologic examination, PET with a SUV 2.5 was found to be the most accurate modality and can help the radiation oncologist delineate the GTV of esophageal carcinoma precisely. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. S214
Author(s):  
J. Corona Sánchez ◽  
S. Córdoba ◽  
G. Salazar ◽  
A. Doval ◽  
M. Vázquez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document