scholarly journals Budget Deficits: Rhetoric and Reality

1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Eisner

Whatever the real or imagined ills of the economy, the news media, most politicians and a fair proportion of the economics profession are quick to point to the culprit: “the budget deficit.” No matter that few appear to know or care precisely what deficit they are talking about or how it is measured. No matter that few bother to explain in terms of a relevant model just how government deficits may be expected to impact the economy. No matter that few offer any empirical data to sustain their judgments. I believe there are serious problems with our fiscal policy. These relate to fundamental national priorities and the provision of public goods, now and for the future. But the current size of the federal deficit is not “our number one economic problem,” if indeed it is a problem at all.

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (4II) ◽  
pp. 641-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fazal Husain ◽  
Muhammad Ali Qasim ◽  
Mahmood Khalid

A sound fiscal policy is important to promote price stability and sustain growth in output and employment. Fiscal policy is regarded as an instrument that can be used to lessen short-run fluctuations in output and employment in many debates of macroeconomic policy. It can also be used to bring the economy to its potential level. If policymakers understand the relationship between government expenditure and government revenue, continuous government deficits can be prevented. Hence the relationship between government expenditure and government revenue has attracted significant interest. This is due to the fact that the relationship between government revenue and expenditure has an impact on the budget deficit. The causal relationship between government revenue and expenditure has remained an empirically debatable issue in the field of public finance. The question of which variable takes precedence over the other has been a central issue to this debate.


2021 ◽  
pp. 2150018
Author(s):  
Yasuhito Tanaka

This study aimed to provide a game-theoretic interpretation of the analyses of involuntary unemployment by deficiency of aggregate demand and fiscal policy to achieve full employment using an overlapping generations model. We showed that involuntary unemployment is in a Nash equilibrium of a game with a firm and consumers. Moreover, we showed that full employment can be achieved through fiscal policies that create budget deficits in recessionary conditions with involuntary unemployment. Once full employment is achieved, it can be sustained without a budget deficit.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (383) ◽  
pp. 207-217
Author(s):  
Andrzej Karpowicz ◽  
G. Tazhbenova ◽  
Zh. Tulegenova ◽  
G. Orynbekova

Certain and predictable tax revenues are desirable by states to run fiscal policy smoothly and minimize any negative effects of business cycles. Over the last decades sizes of government budgets in most EU Member States have experienced rather small transformations. However, particular kinds of taxes contribute to that stability to different extent. Although, this matter is important from the perspective of state budget, it has not been analysed thoroughly before – especially in EU. Based on statistical analysis of macroeconomic data I calculated that revenues from payroll taxes feature especially low variability and positively influence the budget constancy. Changes over time are slightly bigger for taxes imposed on production. Inflows from taxation of income of corporations are particularly unstable. These findings may support policymakers in appropriate budget revenues design. Expansionary fiscal policy is believed to boost economic growth ( (Aschauer, 1989), (Munnell, 1990)). Public investments are traditionally believed to support long-term growth of economies (Barro, Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous, 1990). On the other hand low taxes should support development of economy as well ((Engen & Skinner, 1992), (Daveri & Tabellini, 2000), (Karras & Furceri, 2009), (Padovano & Galli, 2001) or (Lee & Gordon, 2005) to mention only selected research). For example Romer and Romer estimated that a 1% increase in taxation relative to GDP induces reduced output of up to 3% over the following three years (Romer & Romer, 2007). Mountford and Uhling claimed that tax cuts - even if financed from budget deficit – are most effective from the perspective of economy growth (Mountford & Uhlig, 2008). Blanchard and Perotti found that tax shocks affect investment, consumption and output (Blanchard & Perotti, 2002). However, some empirical analysis failed to confirm significance of the relation between GDP and tax rates ((Easterly & Rebelo, 1993), (Mendoza, Milesi-Ferretti, & Asea, 1997)). The correlation between the level of the tax rate and output was found to be indeed negative but sometimes non-existing. These results are in line with common sense. However, in the long run high public spending cannot be combined with low taxes (assuming that low taxes transfer into smaller budget revenues). High public deficits, which may arise in consequence of expansionary fiscal policy, are eventually harmful for economic growth in the long-run. Therefore, satisfactory inflows from taxes are desirable. Maintaining balanced budgets is a typical objective of several world economies. Yet this requirement seems key for European Monetary Union states, which use single currency and hence lead common monetary policy [1]. To improve economic stability of those countries and to provide for at least impeded policy-mix tools, certain requirements related to fiscal policy were imposed on them. According to the so called Convergence Criteria (also known as Maastricht Criteria)(i) the ratio of the annual government deficit to GDP must not exceed 3 percent and (ii) the ratio of government debt to GDP must not exceed 60 percent. However, several Member States are struggling against high budget deficits which are followed by excessive public debts. Most EU Member States have been returning to balance over last years and in 2017 almost half of them recorded government surplus. However, the budget deficit for the EU as a whole is still substantial and in 2017 amounted to 81.6% of its GDP. This is far more than before the crisis in 2007 when a figure of 57.5% of GDP was recorded. Moreover, although from peak in 2014 general government debt decreased on average in a number of Member States, still in 2017 as much as 12 out of 19 eurozone countries bound by the Maastricht criteria recorded debt above required level of 60% of local GDP. Identification of reliable sources of state revenues may provide a useful tool to cope with that issues.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-62
Author(s):  
Ryszard Piasecki ◽  
Erico Wulf Betancourt

A budget surplus arises in a country when the total revenue earnings surpass expenditures in a particular financial year. Having a budget surplus is very important in the sense that it brings about a decrease in the net public debt, while the public debt is increased in the event of a budget deficit. Both budget deficits and budget surpluses also exert indirect influences on taxpayers. Normally, it is not essential on the part of the government to maintain a budget surplus, though it needs to be very careful when running a budget deficit to have the proper buffer.  


Author(s):  
George A. Vamvoukas ◽  
Vassilios N. Gargalas

This paper takes its motives from recent literature concerning the debate on the Keynesian proposition and the Ricardian equivalence, using data of the Greek economy and applying cointegration analysis, Granger causality tests and impulse response functions (IRF). The aim of the econometric methodology is to derive robust results by means of using alternative quantitative techniques. The empirical analysis shows the existence of dynamic relationships between the budget deficit and the interest rate, indicating a two-way causality between deficits and interest rates. The findings of Granger tests and IRFs contradict the view of Ricardian equivalence that government deficits do not influence the behavior of interest rate. Experimenting with the four-variable system (R, D, Y, P), IRF results show that in the case of Greece the budget deficit positively affects the inflation rate. The evidence that budget deficits exert positive effects on interest rates and inflation is consistent with the rationale of the Keynesian proposition.


1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet L Yellen

Is the ballooning federal budget deficit a serious economic problem? The papers in this symposium provide four perspectives on this issue. Robert Barro and Robert Eisner disagree sharply with the “majority” opinion concerning deficits. In contrast, Edward Gramlich and Douglas Bernheim are more sympathetic to the view that budget deficits lower national saving and thus contribute to a reduction in future living standards.


2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 2203-2220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi Brender ◽  
Allan Drazen

We test whether good economic conditions and expansionary fiscal policy help incumbents get reelected in a large panel of democracies. We find no evidence that deficits help reelection in any group of countries independent of income level, level of democracy, or government or electoral system. In developed countries and old democracies, deficits in election years or over the term of office reduce reelection probabilities. Higher growth rates over the term raise reelection probabilities only in developing countries and new democracies. Low inflation is rewarded by voters only in developed countries. These effects are both statistically significant and quite substantial quantitatively. (JEL D72, E62, H62, O47)


Author(s):  
Maimuna M Shehu ◽  
Ibrahim M Adamu

This paper investigates the factors governing the determination of budget deficit in Nigeria from 1981q1 through 2016q4. Our methodology is based on Johansen cointegration and Vector Error Correction model (VECM) approach. The result from the Johansen cointegration test suggests one cointegrating vector, which indicates the existence of a long run cointegrating relationship. Evidence from the long run and short run parameters suggest that exchange rate, interest rate and one year lag of budget deficit are the major determinants of budget deficit. Therefore, to achieve a realistic fiscal surplus, the government should determine a high level of accountability in its fiscal operations. In addition, any fiscal surplus should be channeled into productive investments to diversify the economy and reduce the likelihood of potential budget deficits.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-93
Author(s):  
Chirok Han ◽  
Kwanho Shin

Since the currency crisis in 1998, Korea has experienced continuous current account surpluses. Recently, the current account surplus increased more rapidly—amounting to 7.7 percent of GDP in 2015. In this paper, we investigate the underlying reasons for the widening of Korea's current account surpluses. We find that the upward trend in Korea's current account surpluses is largely explained by its demographical changes. Other economic variables are only helpful when explaining short run fluctuations in current account balances. Moreover, we show that Korea's current account surplus is expected to disappear by 2042 as it becomes one of the most aged economies in the world. Demographic changes are so powerful that they explain, quite successfully, the current account balance trends of other economies with highly aged populations such as Japan, Germany, Italy, Finland, and Greece. When we add the real exchange rate as an additional explanatory variable, it is statistically significant with the right sign, but the magnitude explained by it is quite limited. For example, to reduce the current account surplus by 1 percentage point, a 12 percent depreciation is needed. If Korea's current exchange rate is undervalued 4 to 12 percent less than the level consistent with fundamentals, it is impossible to reduce Korea's current account surplus to a reasonable level by adjusting the exchange rate alone. Another way to reduce current account surplus is to expand fiscal policies. We find, however, that the impact of fiscal adjustments in reducing current account surplus is even more limited. According to our estimates, reducing the current account surplus by 1 percentage point requires an increase in budget deficits (as a ratio to GDP) of 5 to 6 percentage points. If we allow endogenous movements of exchange rate and fiscal policy, the impact of exchange rate adjustment increases by 1.6 times but that of fiscal policy decreases that it is no longer statistically significant.


1994 ◽  
Vol 33 (4II) ◽  
pp. 955-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tayyeb Shabbir ◽  
Ayaz Ahmed

In academia as well as policy-making institutions, there has been a long standing interest in analysing the phenomenon of inflation. Amongst the possible determinants of inflation, budget deficits may be one whose importance might have grown since the oil price hikes of 1973-74 and in 1979. For many a developing countries these increases in oil price have been responsible for the massive current account deficits as well as rapidly increasing domestic budget deficits of the last decade or so. During the 1980s, the budget deficit for Pakistan also grew rapidly reaching a record high of 8.6 percent of the G D P in 1987-88. Lately in the backdrop of the recent structural adjustment programmes, there has been much interest in determining the optimal size and the macro economic role of the budget deficits. However, despite its growing importance, the effects of budget deficits are not well understood.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document