Structure, Thermochemistry and Reactivity of Protonated Glycolaldehyde

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Bouchoux ◽  
Florence Penaud-Berruyer ◽  
William Bertrand

Structures and relative energies of various conformers of the simplest sugar, glycolaldehyde, 1, and its protonated form, [1H]+, were investigated by ab initio molecular orbital calculations. The 298 K heats of formation of the most stable conformers, deduced from the atomization energies at the G2 level, are equal to Δ fH°(1) = −324.8 kJ mol−1 and Δ fH°[1H]+ = 426.0 kJ mol−1. The corresponding proton affinity value is PA(1) = 779.8 kJ mol−1, in perfect agreement with the experimental determination of 783.3 ± 3.8 kJ mol−1 obtained by the kinetic method. A gas-phase basicity value, GB(1), of 745–748 kJ mol−1 is also deduced from theory and experiment. The exclusive dissociation channel of protonated glycolaldehyde, [1H]+, is water loss which leads essentially to the acylium ion [CH3CO]+. The corresponding potential energy profile, investigated at the MP2/6–31G* level, reveals a route via a [CH3CO]+ / water complex after an energy determining step involving a simultaneous 1,2-hydrogen migration and C–O bond elongation. The critical energy of the reaction, evaluated at the G2(MP2,SVP)level, is 170 kJ mol −1 above the most stable conformation of the [1H]+ ion. The 298 K heats of formation of the three most stable [C2H3O]+ ions have been calculated at the G2 level: Δ fH°[CH3CO]+ = 655.0 kJ mol−1, Δ fH°[CH2COH]+ = 833.0 kJ mol−1, Δ fH°[c-CH2CHO]+ = 886.2 kJ mol−1.

1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 1624-1642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gervase I. Mackay ◽  
Ronald S. Hemsworth ◽  
Diethard K. Bohme

The flowing afterglow technique has been employed in measurements of the rate and equilibrium constants at 296 ± 2 K for reactions of the type[Formula: see text]and[Formula: see text]where R1 and R2 may be H, CH3, or C2H5. The equilibrium constant measurements provided absolute values for the intrinsic (gas-phase) acidities of the Brønsted acids CH3NH2, C2H5NH2, (CH3)2NH, and (CH3)3N, the heats of formation of their conjugate bases, and the electron affinities of the corresponding radicals R1R2N. Proton removal energies, ΔG0298/(kcal mol−1), were determined to be 395.7 ± 0.7 for [Formula: see text] 391.7 ± 0.7 for [Formula: see text] 389.2 ± 0.6 for [Formula: see text] and > 396 for [Formula: see text] Heats of formation, ΔH0f.,298, were determined to be 30.5 ± 1.5 for CH3NH−, 21.2 ± 1.5 for C2H5NH−, and 24.7 ± 1.4 for (CH3)2N−. Electron affinities (in kcal mol−1) were determined to be 13.1 ± 3.5 for CH3NH, 17 ± 4 for C2H5NH, and 14.3 ± 3.4 for (CH3)2N. These results quantify earlier conclusions regarding the intrinsic effects of substituents on the gas-phase acidity of amines and provide an experimental assessment of recent molecular orbital calculations of proton removal energies for alkylamines.


1995 ◽  
Vol 418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Politzer ◽  
Jane S. Murray ◽  
M. Edward Grice

AbstractA recently-developed density functional procedure for computing gas phase heats of formation is briefly described and results for several categories of energetic compounds are summarized and discussed. Liquid and solid phase values can be obtained by combining the gas phase data with heats of vaporization and sublimation estimated by means of other relationships. Some observed functional group effects upon heats of formation are noted.


1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S. Patrick ◽  
Sheng S. Yang ◽  
R. Graham Cooks

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document