Versatility in Complexation of Six-Membered Heterocyclic Guests by Singly Bridged Triarylmethanol Hosts. X-Ray Crystal Structures and Thermal Stabilities of Inclusion Compounds with Piperidine, Thioxane/Dioxane, and Morpholine

1995 ◽  
Vol 68 (11) ◽  
pp. 3111-3120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingeborg Csöregh ◽  
Olga Gallardo ◽  
Edwin Weber ◽  
Susan A. Bourne ◽  
Norbert Dörpinghaus
2002 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi R. Nassimbeni ◽  
Hong Su

The diol host, 1,1′-bis-(4-hydroxyphenyl)cyclohexane (DHPC) and a number of xylidine isomers as guests formed a series of inclusion compounds that gave rise to various host:guest ratios controlled by crystallization temperatures. For the host DHPC with a particular xylidine isomer, the number of guests included generally decreases as the crystallization temperature increases. The crystal structures of these host–guest compounds were elucidated using single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Their thermal stabilities were characterized by TG and DSC analysis. The selectivity of enclathration by the host was measured by carrying out a series of competition experiments. The kinetics of guest decomposition were studied using isothermal and non-isothermal methods and reconciled with the crystal structures.


Author(s):  
Jiabin Gao ◽  
Mohan M. Bhadbhade ◽  
Roger Bishop

Racemic 2,4,6,8-tetracarbomethoxybicyclo[3.3.0]octa-2,6-diene-3,7-diol, C16H18O10(1), was known previously to yield two solvent-free polymorphs and also a clathrate inclusion crystal form. Crystallization of (1) yields two inclusion compounds containing tetrahydrofuran (THF): (1)4·THF is obtained from a mixture of THF and methanol, whereas (1)2·THF is obtained from pure THF. The X-ray crystal structures reveal that the two compounds are extremely similar and that their host arrangements are essentially identical. They differ, however, in the proportion, orientation and host–guest interaction of the included THF molecules. The disordered guest molecules in (1)4·THF are oriented along the guest channel direction, whereas in (1)2·THF they lie across the channel. This unusual solvent–guest control of inclusion structures has implications relating to the formation of polymorphic structures and other competing crystal forms.


2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 1026-1031
Author(s):  
Xiangxiang Wu ◽  
Huahui Zeng ◽  
Yunxia Yang

Two novel inclusion compounds of 4,4′-sulfonyldibenzoate anions and tetrapropylammonium cations with different ancillary molecules of water and boric acid, namely bis(tetrapropylammonium) 4,4′-sulfonyldibenzoate dihydrate, 2C12H28N+·C14H8O6S2−·H2O (1), and bis(tetrapropylammonium) 4,4′-sulfonyldibenzoate bis(boric acid), 2C12H28N+·C14H8O6S2−·2H3BO3 (2), were prepared and characterized using single-crystal X-ray diffraction. In the two salts, the host 4,4′-sulfonyldibenzoic acid molecules, which are converted to the corresponding anions under basic conditions, can be regarded as proton acceptors which link different proton donors of the ancillary molecules of water or boric acid. In this way, an isolated hydrogen-bonded tetramer is constructed in salt 1 and a ribbon is constructed in salt 2. The tetramers and ribbons are then packed in a repeating manner to generate various host frameworks, and the tetrapropylammonium guest counter-ions are contained in the cavities of the host lattices to give the final stable crystal structures. In these two salts, although the host anion and guest cation are the same, the difference in the ancillary small molecules results in different structures, indicating the significance of ancillary molecules in the formation of crystal structures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document