scholarly journals Nosema ceranaeparasitism impacts olfactory learning and memory and neurochemistry in honey bees (Apis mellifera)

2017 ◽  
Vol 221 (4) ◽  
pp. jeb161489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Gage ◽  
Catherine Kramer ◽  
Samantha Calle ◽  
Mark Carroll ◽  
Michael Heien ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Christine Bell ◽  
Corina N Montgomery ◽  
Jaime E Benavides ◽  
James C Nieh

Abstract The health of insect pollinators, particularly the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Linnaeus, 1758), is a major concern for agriculture and ecosystem health. In response to mounting evidence supporting the detrimental effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on pollinators, a novel ‘bee safe’ butenolide compound, flupyradifurone (FPF) has been registered for use in agricultural use. Although FPF is not a neonicotinoid, like neonicotinoids, it is an excitotoxic nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist. In addition, A. mellifera faces threats from pathogens, such as the microsporidian endoparasite, Nosema ceranae (Fries et al. 1996). We therefore sought 1) to increase our understanding of the potential effects of FPF on honey bees by focusing on a crucial behavior, the ability to learn and remember an odor associated with a food reward, and 2) to test for a potential synergistic effect on such learning by exposure to FPF and infection with N. ceranae. We found little evidence that FPF significantly alters learning and memory at short-term field-realistic doses. However, at high doses and at chronic, field-realistic exposure, FPF did reduce learning and memory in an olfactory conditioning task. Infection with N. ceranae also reduced learning, but there was no synergy (no significant interaction) between N. ceranae and exposure to FPF. These results suggest the importance of continued studies on the chronic effects of FPF.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (06) ◽  
pp. 194-207
Author(s):  
Timothy E. Black ◽  
Medhat Radi ◽  
Amanda Somers ◽  
Charles I. Abramson

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 36-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiguo Li ◽  
Tiantian Yu ◽  
Yanping Chen ◽  
Matthew Heerman ◽  
Jingfang He ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. jeb.168344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjun Zhang ◽  
Zhengwei Wang ◽  
Ping Wen ◽  
Yufeng Qu ◽  
Ken Tan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Baracchi ◽  
Amélie Cabirol ◽  
Jean-Marc Devaud ◽  
Albrecht Haase ◽  
Patrizia d’Ettorre ◽  
...  

AbstractSince their discovery in insects, pheromones are considered as ubiquitous and stereotyped chemical messengers acting in intraspecific animal communication. Here we studied the effect of pheromones in a different context as we investigated their capacity to induce persistent modulations of associative learning and memory. We used honey bees, Apis mellifera, and combined olfactory conditioning and pheromone preexposure with disruption of neural activity and two-photon imaging of olfactory brain circuits, to characterize the effect of pheromones on olfactory learning and memory. Geraniol, an attractive pheromone component, and 2-heptanone, an aversive pheromone, improved and impaired, respectively, olfactory learning and memory via a durable modulation of appetitive motivation, which left odor processing unaffected. Consistently, interfering with aminergic circuits mediating appetitive motivation rescued or diminished the cognitive effects induced by pheromone components. We thus show that these chemical messengers act as important modulators of motivational processes and influence thereby animal cognition.


2018 ◽  
Vol 221 (17) ◽  
pp. jeb191478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjun Zhang ◽  
Zhengwei Wang ◽  
Ping Wen ◽  
Yufeng Qu ◽  
Ken Tan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jewon Jung ◽  
Dong In Kim ◽  
Rustem Ilyasov ◽  
Kilwon Kim ◽  
Hyung Wook Kwon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document