scholarly journals Cell number in relation to primary pattern formation in the embryo of Xenopus laevis

Development ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-182
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cooke
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Mitotic Index ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Cell Number ◽  
Unoperated Control ◽  
Cell Cycle Time ◽  
Mesodermal Cell ◽  
Equivalent Number ◽  
Experimental Embryo

Results are presented which offer strong evidence that extensive alteration of the fates of embryonic Xenopus cells occurs independently of the schedule of cell division, after operations which lead to a doubling of the axial pattern of mesodermal differentiation in the gastrula. The experimental strategy was to make estimates of total mesodermal cell numbers and mitotic index in closely matched sets, each of three synchronous sibling embryos, fixed during the ten hours following the close of gastrulation. Within each set two embryos, an unoperated control and a sham-operated embryo whose own dorsal-lip (organizer) cells had been replaced with an equivalent graft, were developing normally. The third, experimental embryo had received an organizer implant to replace an equivalent number of cells from its ventral marginal zone, and was thus developing two axial mesodermal patterns of differentiation in relation to two dorsal midlines, the extra pattern embracing much host tissue. Mitotic index was also determined, in specific regions and throughout the mesoderm, in similar sets of embryos but at mid-gastrula stages. The conclusions are justified by the results of a control investigation which show that there is normally no difference in cell cycle time along the presumptive dorso-ventral mesodermal. dimension, during the interval between time of operations and the determination of patterni The lack of any enhancement of mesodermal cell number in late embryos with dual axia patterns, or intervening enhancement of mitotic index in younger operated embryos, thus suggests that new patterns may be determined in the Xenopus gastrula without generation of extra cells. The results are discussed in relation to recent ideas about pattern formation, and the concepts of morphallaxis and epimorphosis.

Cell number in relation to primary pattern formation in the embryo of Xenopus laevis

Development ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 269-289
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cooke
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Cell Number ◽  
The Body ◽  
Morphological Evidence ◽  
Tail Bud ◽  
Cell Cycle Time ◽  
Mesodermal Cell ◽  
Body Pattern

Morphological evidence is presented that definitive mesoderm formation in Xenopus is best understood as extending to the end of the neurula phase of development. A process of recruitment of cells from the deep neurectoderm layers into mesodermal position and behaviour, strictly comparable with that already agreed to occur around the internal blastoporal ‘lip’ during gastrula stages, can be shown to continue at the posterior end of the presumptive body pattern up to stage 20 (earliest tail bud). Spatial patterns of incidence of mitosis are described for the fifteen hours of development between the late gastrula and stage 20–22. These are related to the onset of new cell behaviours and overt cyto-differentiations characterizing the dorsal axial pattern,which occur in cranio-caudal and then medio-lateral spatial sequence as development proceeds. A relatively abrupt cessation of mitosis, among hitherto asynchronously cycling cells,precedes the other changes at each level in the presumptive axial pattern. The widespread incidence of cells still in DNA synthesis, anterior to the last mitoses in the posterior-to-anteriordevelopmental sequence of axial tissue, strongly suggests that cells of notochord and somites in their prolonged, non-cycling phase are G2-arrested, and thus tetraploid. This is discussed in relation to what is known of cell-cycle control in other situations. Best estimates for cell-cycle time in the still-dividing, posterior mesoderm of the neurula lie between 10 and 15 h. The supposition of continuing recruitment from neurectoderm can resolve an apparent discrepancy whereby total mesodermal cell number nevertheless contrives to double over a period of approximately 12 h during neurulation when most of the cells are leaving the cycle. Because of pre-existing evidence that cells maintain their relative positions (despite distortion)during the movements that form the mesodermal mantle, the patterns presented in this paper can be understood in two ways: as a temporal sequence of developmental events undergone by individual, posteriorly recruited cells as they achieve their final positions in the body pattern, or alternatively as a succession of wavefronts with respect to changes of cellstate, passing obliquely across the presumptive body pattern in antero-posterior direction. These concepts are discussed briefly in relation to recent ideas about pattern formation in growing systems.

Advantage of menadione-catalyzed chemiluminescent assay for the determination of viable mammalian cell number

2012 ◽  
Vol 421 (2) ◽  
pp. 428-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiro Yamashoji ◽  
Naoko Yoshikawa ◽  
Masayuki Kirihara ◽  
Toshihiro Tsuneyoshi
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cell ◽  
Cell Number

Mesoderm-inducing factors and Spemann's organiser phenomenon in amphibian development

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Cooke
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Natural Control ◽  
Graft Size ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Inducing Factors ◽  
Mesoderm Inducing Factors ◽  
Host Embryo ◽  
Factor Concentration

Certain proteins from ‘growth factor’ families can initiate mesodermal development in animal cap cells of the amphibian blastula. Cells that are in early stages of their response to one such factor, XTC-MIF (Smith et al. 1988), initiate the formation of a new axial body plan when grafted to the ventral marginal zone of a similarly aged host embryo (Cooke et al. 1987). This replicates the natural control of this phase of development by the dorsal blastoporal lip when similarly grafted; the classical ‘organiser’ phenomenon. I have explored systematically the effect, upon the outcome of this pattern formation using defined inducing factors, of varying graft size, XTC-MIF concentration to which graft cells were exposed, length of exposure before grafting, and host age. The ‘mesodermal organiser’ status, evoked by the factor, appears to be stable, and the variables most influencing the degree of completeness and orderliness of second patterns are graft size and factor concentration. Inappropriately large grafts are not effective. A Xenopus basic fibroblast growth factor homologue, present in the embryo and known to be a strong inducer but of mesoderm with a different character from that induced by XTC-MIF, produced no episode of pattern formation at all when tested in the procedure described in this paper. Organiser status of grafts that have been exposed to mixtures of the two factors is set entirely by the supplied XTC-MIF concentration. Lineage labelling of these grafts, and of classical dorsal lip grafts, reveals closely similar though not identical patterns of contribution to the new structure within the host. Implications of the results for the normal mechanism of body pattern formation are discussed.

Pattern formation in the Blue-Green Alga, Anabaena

1973 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 707-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL WILCOX ◽  
G. J. MITCHISON ◽  
R. J. SMITH
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Green Alga ◽  
Normal Growth ◽  
Growth Conditions ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Blue Green Alga ◽  
Interactive Model ◽  
Differentiated Cells ◽  
Sequence Of Events

Filaments of Anabaena have a spaced pattern of differentiated cells called heterocysts, which is maintained as a filament grows by the regular determination of new heterocysts. By following the growth of every cell in a filament, we have identified proheterocysts (prospective heterocysts) at their earliest appearance, and described the sequence of events in the formation of the pattern. The determination of proheterocysts obeys 2 rules: (1) that there are inhibitory zones around pre-existing heterocysts, and (2) that only the smaller daughter of a division can become a heterocyst (all divisions are asymmetrical). There are, however, certain conditions in which these rules are over-ridden, where a pattern consisting of groups of consecutive proheterocysts is seen which resolves into a normal discrete pattern. This process is highly suggestive of interaction between developing cells. We have tested this hypothesis in normal growth conditions by breaking filaments near to early proheterocysts, on the assumption that this will cause a build-up of inhibitory effect of the cell upon itself. It is found that these cells regress, losing their differentiated character and dividing. We therefore propose an interactive model for pattern formation in Anabaena.

Cell interactions and mesodermal cell fates in the sea urchin embryo

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 43-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Ettensohn
Keyword(s):  
Sea Urchin ◽  
Cell Interactions ◽  
Cell Labeling ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Mesodermal Cell ◽  
Sea Urchin Embryo ◽  
Present Information ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Mesenchyme Cells

Cell interactions during gastrulation play a key role in the determination of mesodermal cell fates in the sea urchin embryo. An interaction between primary and secondary mesenchyme cells (PMCs and SMCs, respectively), the two principal populations of mesodermal cells, regulates the expression of SMC fates. PMCs are committed early in cleavage to express a skeletogenic phenotype. During gastrulation, they transmit a signal that suppresses the skeletogenic potential of a subpopulation of SMCs and directs these cells into an alternative developmental pathway. This review summarizes present information concerning the cellular basis of the PMC-SMC interaction, as analyzed by cell transplantation and ablation experiments, fluorescent cell labeling methods and the use of cell type-specific molecular markers. The nature and stability of SMC fate switching, the timing of the PMC-SMC interaction and its quantitative characteristics, and the lineage, numbers and normal fate of the population of skeletogenic SMCs are discussed. Evidence is presented indicating that PMCs and SMCs come into direct filopodial contact during the late gastrula stage, when the signal is transmitted. Finally, evolutionary questions raised by these studies are briefly addressed.

A novel Xenopus mix-like gene milk involved in the control of the endomesodermal fates

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (14) ◽  
pp. 2577-2585 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Ecochard ◽  
C. Cayrol ◽  
S. Rey ◽  
F. Foulquier ◽  
D. Caillol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Early Response ◽  
Response Gene ◽  
Mesodermal Cell ◽  
Early Response Gene ◽  
Mesoderm Formation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Early Gastrula

Here we describe a novel Xenopus homeobox gene, milk, related by sequence homology and expression pattern to the vegetally expressed Mix.1. As is the case with Mix.1, milk is an immediate early response gene to the mesoderm inducer activin. milk is expressed at the early gastrula stage in the vegetal cells, fated to form endoderm, and in the marginal zone fated to form mesoderm. During gastrulation, expression of milk becomes progressively reduced in the involuting mesodermal cells but is retained in the endoderm, suggesting that it may play a key role in the definition of the endo-mesodermal boundary in the embryo. Overexpression of milk in the marginal zone blocks mesodermal cell involution, represses the expression of several mesodermal genes such as Xbra, goosecoid, Xvent-1 or Xpo and increases the expression of the endodermal gene, endodermin. In the dorsal marginal zone, overexpression of milk leads to a severe late phenotype including the absence of axial structures. Ectopic expression of milk in the animal hemisphere or in ectodermal explants induces a strong expression of endodermin. Taken together, we propose that milk plays a role in the correct patterning of the embryo by repressing mesoderm formation and promoting endoderm identity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document