Homeobox genes and the vertebrate head

Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 103 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. H. Holland

Several Drosophila genes important in the control of embryonic development contain a characteristic sequence of DNA, known as the homeobox. Homeobox sequences are also present in a family of vertebrate genes, which may therefore have regulatory roles during vertebrate embryogenesis. In this article, data concerning the spatial patterns of vertebrate homeobox gene expression are discussed in relation to recent descriptive and experimental analyses of head development. It is concluded that the patterns of gene expression are consistent with homeobox genes having roles in anteroposterior positional specification within the developing brain and possibly the neural crest. The data are not clearly consistent with these genes having direct roles in controlling the patterns of cranial segmentation, although further studies may reveal whether vertebrate segments are units of developmental specification.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 966-966
Author(s):  
Stefan Nagel ◽  
Christof Burek ◽  
Hilmar Quentmeier ◽  
Corinna Meyer ◽  
Andreas Rosenwald ◽  
...  

Abstract Homeobox genes code for transcription factors with essential regulatory impact on cellular processes during embryogenesis and in the adult. Increasingly, members of the circa 200 gene strong family are emerging as major oncogenic players, prompting our investigation into possible homeobox gene dysregulation in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in which no recurrent oncogene involvement has been known. Accordingly, we screened 6 well characterized HL cell lines (HDLM-2, KM-H2, L-1236, L-428, L-540, SUP-HD1) and 3 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cell lines (RC-K8, RI-1, SC-1) for homeobox gene expression using Affymetrix U133-2.0 whole-genome oligonucleotide microarrays. Of 15 candidate genes thus shown to reveal HL-specific expression patterns, 5 homeobox genes were shortlisted as potentially key dysregulatory targets in HL after additional RT-PCR expression analysis relative to controls. While 3/5 homeobox genes were upregulated in HL (HOXB9, HOXC8, HLXB9), 2/5 were downregulated (BOB1, PAX5). Furthermore, cloning and sequencing RT-PCR products obtained with degenerate primers recognizing conserved homeobox motifs confirmed the predominant expression of HOXB9 in HL cells. However, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of the HOXB locus (at 17q21) revealed no cytogenetic aberrations, indicating that its activation is conducted non-chromosomally in HL cells. Surprisingly, known target genes of HOXB9 and HOXC8 remained unperturbed, implying novel downstream effector pathways in HL cells. Antisense oligos directed against HOXB9 and forced expression experiments using cloned full length HOXB9 cDNA indicated its involvement in both proliferation and apoptosis. Cell cycle regulators BTG1, BTG2 and GEMININ have been described to interact with HOXB9 and may represent potential targets deserving investigation. We recently showed that HLXB9 promotes IL6 expression in HL cells in response to a constitutively active PI3K signalling pathway therein (Nagel et al., Leukemia19, 841–6, 2005). Our most recent data indicate that HLXB9 is also expressed in various NHL cell lines including anaplastic, diffuse and mediastinal large cell as well as follicular B-cell lymphomas while expression is notably absent from Burkitt, mantle cell and natural killer T-cell lymphomas reflecting their pathologic classification. Intriguingly, our data highlight unexpected similarities between HL and prostate cancer cells which together uniquely overexpress HOXB9, HOXC8 and HLXB9 (or its close homolog GBX2). Additional genes expressed in prostate carcinoma (HOXB13, PRAC1, PRAC2) were detected in two HL cell lines (KM-H2 and L-428) suggesting further parallels may be revealed. Detection of downregulated B-cell differentiation factors BOB1 and PAX5 in our panel of HL cell lines validated this approach. Both factors were previously implicated in oncogenesis of HL lacking IGH rearrangements and other key B-cell characteristics. In summary, we identified a unique homeobox gene expression pattern involving HOXB9, HOXB13, HOXC8 and HLXB9 in HL cell lines resembling that of prostate carcinoma cells. Overexpressed HOXB9 contributes to proliferation and protects against apoptosis in HL cells potentially via interacting with cell cycle regulators BTG1/2 and/or GEMININ.


1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1317-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Duluc ◽  
O. Lorentz ◽  
C. Fritsch ◽  
C. Leberquier ◽  
M. Kedinger ◽  
...  

In segmented organs, homeobox genes are involved in axial patterning and cell identity. Much less is known about their role in non-segmented endoderm derivatives such as the digestive epithelium. Using a xenograft model of fetal intestinal anlagen implanted under the skin of nude mice, we have investigated whether the expression of five homeobox genes (HoxA-4, HoxA-9, HoxC-8, Cdx-1 and Cdx-2) is modified when intestinal epithelium undergoes normal development or displays heterodifferentiation in association with heterotopic mesenchyme. In homotypic associations of fetal endoderm and mesenchyme that recapitulate normal development, the overall pattern of homeobox gene expression was maintained: HoxA-9 and HoxC-8 were the highest in the colon and ileum, respectively, and HoxA-4 was expressed all along the intestine; Cdx-1 and Cdx-2 exhibited an increasing gradient of expression from small intestine to colon. Yet, grafting per se caused a faint upregulation of HoxA-9 and HoxC-8 in small intestinal regions in which these genes are not normally expressed, while the endoderm-mesenchyme dissociation-association step provoked a decay of Cdx-1 in the colon. In heterotopic associations of colonic endoderm with small intestinal mesenchyme, the colonic epithelium exhibited heterodifferentiation to a small intestinal-like phenotype. In this case, we observed a decay of HoxA-9 expression and an upregulation of HoxC-8. Additionally, heterodifferentiation of the colonic epithelium was accompanied by a downregulation of Cdx-1 and Cdx-2 to a level similar to that found in the normal small intestine. To demonstrate that mesenchyme-derived cells can influence Cdx-1 and Cdx-2 expression in the bowel epithelium, fetal jejunal endoderm was associated with intestinal fibroblastic cell lines that either support small intestinal-like or colonic-like morphogenesis. A lower expression of both homeobox genes was shown in grafts presenting the small intestinal phenotype than in those showing glandular colonic-like differentiation. Taken together, these results suggest that homeobox genes participate in the control of the positional information and/or cell differentiation in the intestinal epithelium. They also indicate that the level of Cdx-1 and Cdx-2 homeobox gene expression is influenced by epithelial-mesenchymal cell interactions in the intestinal mucosa.


Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 187-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hunt ◽  
Jenny Whiting ◽  
Ian Muchamore ◽  
Heather Marshall ◽  
Robb Krumlauf

Antennapedia class homeobox genes, which in insects are involved in regional specification of the segmented central regions of the body, have been implicated in a similar role in the vertebrate hindbrain. The development of the hindbrain involves the establishment of compartments which are subsequently made distinct from each other by Hox gene expression, implying that the lineage of neural cells may be an important factor in their development. The hindbrain produces the neural crest that gives rise to the cartilages of the branchial skeleton. Lineage also seems to be important in the neural crest, as experiments have shown that the crest will form cartilages appropriate to its level of origin when grafted to a heterotopic location. We show how the Hox genes could also be involved in patterning the mesenchymal structures of the branchial skeleton. Recently it has been proposed that the rhombomererestricted expression pattern of Hox 2 genes is the result of a tight spatially localised induction from underlying head mesoderm, in which a prepattern of Hox expression is visible. We find no evidence for this model, our data being consistent with the idea that the spatially localised expression pattern is a result of segmentation processes whose final stages are intrinsic to the neural plate. We suggest the following model for patterning in the branchial region. At first a segment-restricted code of Hox gene expression becomes established in the neuroepithelium and adjacent presumptive neural crest. This expression is then maintained in the neural crest during migration, resulting in a Hox code in the cranial ganglia and branchial mesenchyme that reflects the crest's rhombomere of origin. The final stage is the establishment of Hox 2 expression in the surface ectoderm which is brought into contact with neural crest-derived branchial mesenchyme. The Hox code of the branchial ectoderm is established later in development than that of the neural plate and crest, and involves the same combination of genes as the underlying crest. Experimental observations suggest the idea of an instructive interaction between branchial crest and its overlying ectoderm, which would be consistent with our observations. The distribution of clusters of Antennapedia class genes within the animal kingdom suggests that the primitive chordates ancestral to vertebrates had at least one Hox cluster. The origin of the vertebrates is thought to have been intimately linked to the appearance of the neural crest, initially in the branchial region. Our data are consistent with the idea that the branchial region of the head arose in evolution before the more anterior parts, the development of the branchial region employing the Hox genes in a more determinate patterning system. In this scenario, the anterior parts of the head arose subsequently, which may explain the greater importance of interactions in their development, and the fact that Antennapedia class Hox genes are not expressed there.


2020 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imadeldin Yahya ◽  
Marion Böing ◽  
Beate Brand-Saberi ◽  
Gabriela Morosan-Puopolo

AbstractCell migration plays a crucial role in early embryonic development. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 has been reported to guide migration of neural crest cells (NCCs) to form the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and sympathetic ganglia (SG). CXCR4 also plays an important part during the formation of limb and cloacal muscles. NCCs migration and muscle formation during embryonic development are usually considered separately, although both cell lineages migrate in close neighbourhood and have markers in common. In this study, we present a new method for the simultaneous detection of CXCR4, mesodermal markers and NCCs markers during chicken embryo developmental stages HH18–HH25 by combining double whole-mount in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunostaining on floating vibratome sections. The simultaneous detection of CXCR4 and markers for the mesodermal and neural crest cells in multiple labelling allowed us to compare complex gene expression patterns and it could be easily used for a wide range of gene expression pattern analyses of other chicken embryonic tissues. All steps of the procedure, including the preparation of probes and embryos, prehybridization, hybridization, visualization of the double labelled transcripts and immunostaining, are described in detail.


Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (12) ◽  
pp. 4117-4125 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Appel ◽  
V. Korzh ◽  
E. Glasgow ◽  
S. Thor ◽  
T. Edlund ◽  
...  

In zebrafish, individual primary motoneurons can be uniquely identified by their characteristic cell body positions and axonal projection patterns. The fate of individual primary motoneurons remains plastic until just prior to axogenesis when they become committed to particular identities. We find that distinct primary motoneurons express particular combinations of LIM homeobox genes. Expression precedes axogenesis as well as commitment, suggesting that LIM homeobox genes may contribute to the specification of motoneuronal fates. By transplanting them to new spinal cord positions, we demonstrate that primary motoneurons can initiate a new program of LIM homeobox gene expression, as well as the morphological features appropriate for the new position. We conclude that the patterned distribution of different primary motoneuronal types within the zebrafish spinal cord follows the patterned expression of LIM homeobox genes, and that this reflects a highly resolved system of positional information controlling gene transcription.


2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
P. Murthi ◽  
N. A. Pathirage ◽  
R. Keogh ◽  
M. Cocquebert ◽  
N. Segond ◽  
...  

During human placental development trophoblast cells differentiate along either the villous cytotrophoblast (VCT) lineage to form the syncytiotrophoblast (ST) or the invasive extravillous cytotrophoblast (EVCT) lineage (1). Abnormalities in early differentiation processes are characteristic of poor placentation, which is associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR) and pre-eclampsia (PE), the major clinical complications of human pregnancy (2). A large family of homeobox gene transcription factors controls “cell-fate decisions” during development (3), but the expression profile and role of homeobox genes in the human trophoblast cell lineages is not well understood. The aim of the study was to determine homeobox gene expression in primary cultures of mononuclear VCT (2h) and EVCT (2 h) obtained from first trimester human chorionic villi of 8–12 weeks of gestation and in vitro differentiated ST (72 h) and invasive EVCT (48 h), respectively. The isolation and characterization of freshly isolated VCT, EVCT and in vitro differentiated ST and invasive EVCT were performed as described previously (1,4). The homeobox gene mRNA profile was performed using PCR arrays in a pooled sample of VCT and EVCT (n = 6 in each group) and further validated by real-time PCR. Homeobox gene expression studies revealed MSX2 mRNA levels were the highest in VCT (2 h) but undetectable in EVCT (2 h). Further comparisons of homeobox gene expression in in vitro differentiated ST to invasive EVCT showed marked increase in MSX2, DLX3, DLX4 and MEIS1 mRNA levels in ST, which are regulators of cellular differentiation in many studies. Homeobox genes HLX and HHEX, which are implicated in regulating cellular proliferation showed decreased mRNA levels in ST compared to invasive EVCT. Our results demonstrated several known placental and novel homeobox genes are differentially expressed in trophoblast cell lineages. Functional studies of these candidate genes will provide a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of early placental development. (1) Tarrade et al. (2001) Lab Invest. 81, 1199–1211.(2) LokeYW and King A (1995) Cell Biology and Immunology, Cambridge ed.(3) J Cross et al. (2002) Recent Progress in Hormone Research 57: 221–234.(4) Handschuh et al. (2007) Placenta, 28, 175–184.


1994 ◽  
Vol 162 (1) ◽  
pp. 288-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Bober ◽  
Christopher Baum ◽  
Thomas Braun ◽  
Hans-Henning Arnold

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (7) ◽  
pp. 1457-1466 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sato ◽  
T. Kojima ◽  
T. Michiue ◽  
K. Saigo

In Drosophila notum, the expression of achaete-scute proneural genes and bristle formation have been shown to be regulated by putative prepattern genes expressed longitudinally. Here, we show that two homeobox genes at the Bar locus (BarH1 and BarH2) may belong to a different class of prepattern genes expressed latitudinally, and suggest that the developing notum consists of checker-square-like subdomains, each governed by a different combination of prepattern genes. BarH1 and BarH2 are coexpressed in the anterior-most notal region and regulate the formation of microchaetae within the region of BarH1/BarH2 expression through activating achaete-scute. Presutural macrochaetae formation also requires Bar homeobox gene activity. Bar homeobox gene expression is restricted dorsally and posteriorly by Decapentaplegic signaling, while the ventral limit of the expression domain of Bar homeobox genes is determined by wingless whose expression is under the control of Decapentaplegic signaling.


Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mackenzie ◽  
G.L. Leeming ◽  
A.K. Jowett ◽  
M.W. Ferguson ◽  
P.T. Sharpe

Hox 7.1 is a murine homeobox-containing gene expressed in a range of neural-crest-derived tissues and areas of putative epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during embryogenesis. We have examined the expression of Hox 7.1 during craniofacial development in the mouse embryo between days 8 and 16 of development. Whereas facial expression at day 10 of gestation is broadly localised in the neural-crest-derived mesenchyme of the medial nasal, lateral nasal, maxillary and mandibular processes, by day 12 expression is restricted to the mesenchyme immediately surrounding the developing tooth germs in the maxillary and mandibular processes. Hox 7.1 expression in the mesenchyme of the dental papilla and follicle is maximal at the cap stage of development and progressively declines in the bell stage prior to differentiation of odontoblasts and ameloblasts. Hox 7.1 expression in tooth germs is independent of overall embryonic stage of development but is dependent on stage of development of the individual tooth. Similar patterns of transient Hox 7.1 expression can also be detected in tooth germs in vitro in organ cultures of day 11 first branchial arch explants cultured for up to 7 days. Hox 7.1 is also expressed early in development (days 10/11) in the epithelium of the developing anterior pituitary (Rathke's pouch), the connective tissue capsule and meninges of the developing brain, and specific regions of neuroepithelium in the developing brain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document