Homeobox genes and models for patterning the hindbrain and branchial arches

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 187-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hunt ◽  
Jenny Whiting ◽  
Ian Muchamore ◽  
Heather Marshall ◽  
Robb Krumlauf

Antennapedia class homeobox genes, which in insects are involved in regional specification of the segmented central regions of the body, have been implicated in a similar role in the vertebrate hindbrain. The development of the hindbrain involves the establishment of compartments which are subsequently made distinct from each other by Hox gene expression, implying that the lineage of neural cells may be an important factor in their development. The hindbrain produces the neural crest that gives rise to the cartilages of the branchial skeleton. Lineage also seems to be important in the neural crest, as experiments have shown that the crest will form cartilages appropriate to its level of origin when grafted to a heterotopic location. We show how the Hox genes could also be involved in patterning the mesenchymal structures of the branchial skeleton. Recently it has been proposed that the rhombomererestricted expression pattern of Hox 2 genes is the result of a tight spatially localised induction from underlying head mesoderm, in which a prepattern of Hox expression is visible. We find no evidence for this model, our data being consistent with the idea that the spatially localised expression pattern is a result of segmentation processes whose final stages are intrinsic to the neural plate. We suggest the following model for patterning in the branchial region. At first a segment-restricted code of Hox gene expression becomes established in the neuroepithelium and adjacent presumptive neural crest. This expression is then maintained in the neural crest during migration, resulting in a Hox code in the cranial ganglia and branchial mesenchyme that reflects the crest's rhombomere of origin. The final stage is the establishment of Hox 2 expression in the surface ectoderm which is brought into contact with neural crest-derived branchial mesenchyme. The Hox code of the branchial ectoderm is established later in development than that of the neural plate and crest, and involves the same combination of genes as the underlying crest. Experimental observations suggest the idea of an instructive interaction between branchial crest and its overlying ectoderm, which would be consistent with our observations. The distribution of clusters of Antennapedia class genes within the animal kingdom suggests that the primitive chordates ancestral to vertebrates had at least one Hox cluster. The origin of the vertebrates is thought to have been intimately linked to the appearance of the neural crest, initially in the branchial region. Our data are consistent with the idea that the branchial region of the head arose in evolution before the more anterior parts, the development of the branchial region employing the Hox genes in a more determinate patterning system. In this scenario, the anterior parts of the head arose subsequently, which may explain the greater importance of interactions in their development, and the fact that Antennapedia class Hox genes are not expressed there.

Endocrinology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 148 (3) ◽  
pp. 1235-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liwei Huang ◽  
Yongbing Pu ◽  
David Hepps ◽  
David Danielpour ◽  
Gail S. Prins

Axis positioning and tissue determination during development involve coordinated expression of Hox genes throughout the body. The most posterior Hox gene clusters are involved in prostate organogenesis. In the present study, we characterized and compared the expression profiles of posterior (5′) Hox genes in the separate lobes of the adult rat prostate gland, the coagulating gland, seminal vesicles, and epididymis using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. These genes include Hoxa9–11, Hoxa13, Hoxd13, and Hoxb13. We identified a unique Hox code for each of these organs and propose that this contributes to the organ-specific and prostate lobe-specific identities in the adult rat. Using the ventral prostate (VP) as a model, we characterized the Hox genes expression patterns over time from birth through adulthood. Expression levels of the three Hox13 genes and Hoxa10 were significantly higher in the adult VP compared with the neonatal developing VP suggesting an important role during adult homeostasis. In contrast, Hoxa9 and Hoxa11 levels declined after morphogenesis suggesting a specific developmental role. Overall, the Hoxb13 gene exhibited the most striking temporal and organ-specific differences. Using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, a distinct Hoxb13 anterior-to-posterior expression gradient was observed with the highest expression levels in the VP luminal epithelial cells, moderate levels in the lateral prostate, and low expression in the dorsal prostate. An expression gradient was also observed along the ductal length in all three prostate lobes with strongest expression at the distal tips and limited expression in the proximal ducts. After infection with a lentivirus expressing the Hoxb13 gene, NRP-152 cells cultured under nondifferentiating conditions exhibited robust cytokeratin 8 immunostain indicating that Hoxb13 expression drives luminal cell differentiation in the rat epithelium. Androgen regulation of prostatic Hox gene expression was examined during development in vitro and after castration in the adult rat. In the neonatal VP, all six Hox genes were significantly up-regulated by androgens, whereas none of the genes were affected by testosterone in the lateral prostate. In the adult rat, castration resulted in up-regulation of Hoxa9 and Hoxa13 in the VP and down-regulation of Hoxb13 in the dorsal prostate and lateral prostate. Taken together, we conclude that the prostatic Hox genes reach a destined expression level at specific developmental time points in the prostate gland and possess differential androgenic regulation in a temporal and lobe-specific manner. We suggest that this timely Hox code participates in determining lobe-specific prostatic identity and cellular differentiation.


Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (18) ◽  
pp. 4301-4313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Creuzet ◽  
Gérard Couly ◽  
Christine Vincent ◽  
Nicole M. Le Douarin

Diencephalic, mesencephalic and metencephalic neural crest cells are skeletogenic and derive from neural folds that do not express Hox genes. In order to examine the influence of Hox gene expression on skull morphogenesis, expression of Hoxa2, Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 in conjunction with that of the green fluorescent protein has been selectively targeted to the Hox-negative neural folds of the avian embryo prior to the onset of crest cell emigration. Hoxa2 expression precludes the development of the entire facial skeleton. Transgenic Hoxa2 embryos such as those from which the Hox-negative domain of the cephalic neural crest has been removed have no upper or lower jaws and no frontonasal structures. Embryos subjected to the forced expression of Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 show severe defects in the facial skeleton but not a complete absence of facial cartilage. Hoxa3 prevents the formation of the skeleton derived from the first branchial arch, but allows the development (albeit reduced) of the nasal septum. Hoxb4, by contrast, hampers the formation of the nasal bud-derived skeleton, while allowing that of a proximal (but not distal) segment of the lower jaw. The combined effect of Hoxa3 and Hoxb4 prevents the formation of facial skeletal structures, comparable with Hoxa2. None of these genes impairs the formation of neural derivatives of the crest. These results suggest that over the course of evolution, the absence of Hox gene expression in the anterior part of the chordate embryo was crucial in the vertebrate phylum for the development of a face, jaws and brain case, and, hence, also for that of the forebrain.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1288-1288
Author(s):  
Julia Starkova ◽  
Blanka Vicenova ◽  
Roman Krejci ◽  
Harry A. Drabkin ◽  
Jan Trka

Abstract Abstract 1288 Poster Board I-310 Homeodomain (HOX) genes encode transcription factors important for embryonic development. They are involved in normal hemopoiesis regulation and likely also in leukemogenesis as a result of translocations and other aberrations present in leukemias. In previous work Drabkin et al. demonstrated that HOX gene expression patterns differentiate major cytogenetic groups in acute myeloid leukemias. In this study we focused on HOX gene expression in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALL). We were interested if certain HOX genes or expression pattern could distinguish subpopulations of ALL. We analyzed the expression pattern of 21 HOX genes from HOXA and HOXB clusters and non-cluster HOX genes, CDX1 and CDX2 using qRT-PCR approach. We looked at 54 patients chosen according to phenotypic (T-ALL, BCP-ALL), prognostic (PGR – prednisone good responders, PPR – prednisone poor responders) and genotypic (BCR/ABL, MLL/AF4, TEL/AML1, hyperdiploid) characteristics. Overall analysis comparing all studied groups showed that HOXA7 (Kruskal-Wallis test p=0.000045), HOXA3 (p=0.000098), HOXB3 (p=0.00015), HOXA4 (p=0.000619) and HOXB4 (p=0.001925) genes were differently expressed among groups. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a non-parametric statistical analysis comparing two groups against each other, showed that HOXA3, A4 and B3 distinguish BCP-ALL (w/o fusion gene) and T-ALL. Interestingly, particular HOX genes expression showed significant difference among the groups: HOXA7 gene is significantly downregulated in hyperdiploid ALL (p=0.03) compared to all other subgroups. Furthermore, HOXB7 gene is specifically upregulated in TEL/AML-positive patients (p=0.0048 vs BCP-ALL w/o fusion gene) and CDX2 is downregulated in BCR/ABL-positive patients (p=0.001 vs hyperdiploid; p=0.006 vs TEL/AML1; p=0.03 vs MLL/AF4). Suprisingly, TEL/AML1-positive patients have similar expression of HOXA1-A4 as T-ALL patients. HOX genes expression pattern seemed to differ in MLL/AF4-positive patients according to the age at diagnosis. Three patients younger than 2 months at presentation clustered together in clear contrast to the MLL/AF4-positive patient diagnosed at the age of 13 years with secALL who presented with very low overall expression of all HOX genes. Next, we looked for diversity and similarity between groups. We determined how many HOX genes were expressed differently (p<0.05) and similarly (p=1.0) between particular ALL subtypes. The most outlying couples were T-ALL vs PPR (11 genes differently expressed), T-ALL vs PGR (9 genes) and T-ALL vs TEL/AML1 (6 genes). In contrast, the closest groups were BCR/ABL vs PPR, MLL/AF4 vs T-ALL and MLL/AF4 vs PPR. Our data demonstrate that BCP-ALL (w/o known fusion gene) can be distinguished from T-ALL by the HOX gene expression (in particular HOXA3, HOXB3, HOXA4). Like in AML, expression pattern differs also among the major cytogenetical subgroups of ALL. On the other hand, within the BCP-ALL subgroup, no expression difference was found between patients with good (PGR) and poor (PPR) response to the initial steroid therapy which is known to be an excellent predictor of outcome. HOX genes of interest emerged from our analysis: low expression of HOXA7 in hyperdiploid ALL, highly expressed HOXB7 in TEL/AML1-positive ALL and specifically downregulated CDX2 in BCR/ABL-positive ALL. Age-related differences in expression in MLL/AF4-positive ALL seem to link the expression pattern rather with the relative maturity of the cell undergoing (pre)malignant transformation than with the specific changes caused by the leukemogenesis itself. This hypothesis must be tested in comparison to the HOX genes expression in sorted subtypes of normal T and B precursors. This work was supported by MSM0021620813, IGA NR/9526 and GACR 301/08/P532. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (11) ◽  
pp. 2239-2249 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Abzhanov ◽  
T.C. Kaufman

Representatives of the Insecta and the Malacostraca (higher crustaceans) have highly derived body plans subdivided into several tagma, groups of segments united by a common function and/or morphology. The tagmatization of segments in the trunk, the part of the body between head and telson, in both lineages is thought to have evolved independently from ancestors with a distinct head but a homonomous, undifferentiated trunk. In the branchiopod crustacean, Artemia franciscana, the trunk Hox genes are expressed in broad overlapping domains suggesting a conserved ancestral state (Averof, M. and Akam, M. (1995) Nature 376, 420–423). In comparison, in insects, the Antennapedia-class genes of the homeotic clusters are more regionally deployed into distinct domains where they serve to control the morphology of the different trunk segments. Thus an originally Artemia-like pattern of homeotic gene expression has apparently been modified in the insect lineage associated with and perhaps facilitating the observed pattern of tagmatization. Since insects are the only arthropods with a derived trunk tagmosis tested to date, we examined the expression patterns of the Hox genes Antp, Ubx and abd-A in the malacostracan crustacean Porcellio scaber (Oniscidae, Isopoda). We found that, unlike the pattern seen in Artemia, these genes are expressed in well-defined discrete domains coinciding with tagmatic boundaries which are distinct from those of the insects. Our observations suggest that, during the independent tagmatization in insects and malacostracan crustaceans, the homologous ‘trunk’ genes evolved to perform different developmental functions. We also propose that, in each lineage, the changes in Hox gene expression pattern may have been important in trunk tagmatization.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2504-2504
Author(s):  
Julia Starkova ◽  
Karolina Kramarzova ◽  
Karel Fiser ◽  
Ester Mejstrikova ◽  
Katerina Rejlova ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Homeobox (HOX) genes encode transcription factors crucial in embryogenesis. They are often dysregulated in malignancies including leukemias. The aberrant HOX gene expression and its regulation in leukemic cells is neither completely described nor understood. Aims Our main aim was to determine whether the leukemic HOX gene expression pattern is driven by differentiation stage of hematopoietic cells or determined de novo during the process of malignant transformation. Consequentially, we aimed to study the role epigenetic modifiers in regulation of HOX gene expression in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Methods The expression pattern of HOX genes (cluster of HOX A and B) and epigenetic modifiers (DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b, EZH2, BMI-1, MLL, JMJD3, UTX) was assessed by qPCR in 8 FACS-sorted subpopulations of healthy BM representing stages of myeloid differentiation (each sample representing a pool of cells sorted from five individuals). The leukemic expression pattern of these genes was analyzed in diagnostic BM samples of childhood AML patients with typical genotypic and morphological (FAB classification) characteristics (N=46). In vitro experiments were performed using NB4 cell line. Results As expected HOX genes were gradually downregulated during normal differentiation of granulocytic and monocytic lineages (assessed in four consecutive differentiation stages for each lineage). In AML samples, HOX gene expression patterns differed significantly among morphological subtypes. However, HOX gene expression did not correlate among subtypes of AML and their physiologically differentiated counterparts. Interestingly, unsupervised hierarchical clustering (HCA) divided AML patients into four main clusters characterized by the presence of prevalent gene rearrangement (PML-RARa, AML1-ETO, MLL rearrangements and NK-AML). The presence of PML/RARa rearrangement was strongly associated with the lowest expression of both HOXA and HOXB clusters, while the other groups had more variable expression of HOX genes. Moreover, the effect of genetic aberrations on HOX gene expression was clearly apparent within AML M2 and M4 subtypes, where AML1/ETO+ or CBFb/MYH11+ patients had significantly lower expression of HOX genes compared to patients with the same FAB classification but without the rearrangements. The expression pattern of epigenetic modifiers in sorted subpopulations of healthy BM followed their expected role in transcriptional regulation during differentiation. However, there was no relation of this pattern to HOX gene expression. On the contrary, in AML samples, the expression levels of epigenetic modifiers clearly correlated with expression profile of HOX genes. These results were supported by unsupervised HCA based on the expression of epigenetic modifiers that showed upregulation of histon demethylases JMJD3 and UTX together with downregulation of DNMT3b in concordance with high levels of HOX genes. Negative correlation between JMJD3 and DNMT3b expression was observed in all leukemic samples (p=0.03); most apparently in PML/RARa+ patients. Therefore we further studied the impact of genetic aberrations on the epigenetic regulation of HOX gene expression in vitrowith PML-RARa+ cell line. Treatment of NB4 cells with ATRA (8, 24hours, 1uM, 10uM) increased the levels of particular HOX genes (HOXA5, A7, B4, B7; FCA=2.8; 1.7; 4; 4 respectively) as well as JMJD3 (FCA=3) and UTX (FCA=1.6). Concordantly, the expression of DNMT3b (FCA=5) was downregulated. The hypothetical driving effect of PML-RARa on de novo determination of leukemic HOX gene expression is further supported by our Results. PML-RARa+ patients had the lowest HOX gene expression regardless of their FLT3/ITD status – previously shown to upregulate strongly HOX genes expression. Conclusion We conclude that the leukemic expression pattern of HOX genes does not reflect the differentiation stages of malignant cells. Our data also demonstrate different contribution of epigenetic modifiers to the HOX gene expression in healthy and malignant hematopoiesis. Moreover, HCA and expression data together with the results of in vitro experiments suggest that the specific molecular aberrations (as exemplified by PML-RARa) participate in regulation of leukemic HOX gene expression through epigenetic changes. Supported by GACR P304/12/2214, GAUK 568213, 00064203. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1994 ◽  
Vol 266 (4) ◽  
pp. L448-L454 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. W. Bogue ◽  
I. Gross ◽  
H. Vasavada ◽  
D. W. Dynia ◽  
C. M. Wilson ◽  
...  

Hox genes are sequence-specific DNA transcription factors, which are important in embryonic development and are expressed in a number of fetal tissues, including the lung. Additionally, retinoic acid (RA) has been shown to modulate Hox gene expression in a number of cell types. The specific aims of this study were to 1) identify those Hox genes expressed in newborn mouse lung using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), 2) study the ontogeny of Hox gene expression in fetal mouse and rat lung by Northern analysis using cDNAs for mouse Hox genes, and 3) study the effects of RA on whole lung Hox mRNA levels in cultured fetal rat lung explants. Our data show that 16 different homeobox genes are expressed in newborn mouse lung. This includes seven Hox genes not previously identified in lung, as well as the divergent homeobox gene Hex. Steady-state mRNA levels of Hox A5 (Hox 1.3), B5 (Hox 2.1), B6 (Hox 2.2), and B8 (Hox 2.4) decrease with advancing gestational age in mouse lungs (E14 to adult). Similarly, Hox A5, B5, and B6 follow the same decreasing pattern of expression with advancing gestational age in rat lungs (E15 to adult). RA treatment of E17 rat lung explants in culture resulted in a significant dose- and time-dependent increase in Hox A5, B5, and B6 mRNA levels. The highest mRNA levels were seen in explants treated with 1 x 10(-5) M RA for 4-16 h. We conclude that there are many homeobox genes expressed in developing rodent lung and that their mRNA levels are affected by both gestational age and RA.


Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (7) ◽  
pp. 1173-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Grapin-Botton ◽  
M.A. Bonnin ◽  
M. Sieweke ◽  
N.M. Le Douarin

It has been shown by using the quail/chick chimera system that Hox gene expression in the hindbrain is influenced by positional signals arising from the environment. In order to decipher the pathway that leads to Hox gene induction, we have investigated whether a Hox gene regulator, the leucine zipper transcription factor MafB/Kr, is itself transcriptionally regulated by the environmental signals. This gene is normally expressed in rhombomeres (r) 5 and 6 and their associated neural crest. MafB/Kr expression is maintained in r5/6 when grafted into the environment of r3/4. On the contrary, the environment of rhombomeres 7/8 represses MafB/Kr expression. Thus, as previously shown for the expression of Hox genes, MafB/Kr expression is regulated by a posterior-dominant signal, which in this case induces the loss of expression of this gene. We also show that the posterior signal can be transferred to the r5/6 neuroepithelium by posterior somites (somites 7 to 10) grafted laterally to r5/6. At the r4 level, the same somites induce MafB/Kr in r4, leading it to behave like r5/6. The posterior environment regulates MafB/Kr expression in the neural crest as it does in the corresponding hindbrain level, showing that some positional regulatory mechanisms are shared by neural tube and neural crest cells. Retinoic acid beads mimic the effect produced by the somites in repressing MafB/Kr in r5/6 and progressively inducing it more rostrally as its concentration increases. We therefore propose that the MafB/Kr expression domain is defined by a molecule unevenly distributed in the paraxial mesoderm. This molecule would allow the expression of the MafB/Kr gene in a narrow window of concentration by activating its expression at a definite threshold and repressing it at higher levels, accounting for its limited domain of expression in only two rhombomeres. It thus appears that the regulation of MafB/Kr expression in the rhombomeres could be controlled by the same posteriorizing factor(s) as Hox genes.


Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (19) ◽  
pp. 4265-4275 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L. Nowicki ◽  
A.C. Burke

The successful organization of the vertebrate body requires that local information in the embryo be translated into a functional, global pattern. Somite cells form the bulk of the musculoskeletal system. Heterotopic transplants of segmental plate along the axis from quail to chick were performed to test the correlation between autonomous morphological patterning and Hox gene expression in somite subpopulations. The data presented strengthen the correlation of Hox gene expression with axial specification and focus on the significance of Hox genes in specific derivatives of the somites. We have defined two anatomical compartments of the body based on the embryonic origin of the cells making up contributing structures: the dorsal compartment, formed from purely somitic cell populations; and the ventral compartment comprising cells from somites and lateral plate. The boundary between these anatomical compartments is termed the somitic frontier. Somitic tissue transplanted between axial levels retains both original Hox expression and morphological identity in the dorsal compartment. In contrast, migrating lateral somitic cells crossing the somitic frontier do not maintain donor Hox expression but apparently adopt the Hox expression of the lateral plate and participate in the morphology appropriate to the host level. Dorsal and ventral compartments, as defined here, have relevance for experimental manipulations that influence somite cell behavior. The correlation of Hox expression profiles and patterning behavior of cells in these two compartments supports the hypothesis of independent Hox codes in paraxial and lateral plate mesoderm.


Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (17) ◽  
pp. 3445-3459 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Couly ◽  
A. Grapin-Botton ◽  
P. Coltey ◽  
B. Ruhin ◽  
N.M. Le Douarin

In addition to pigment cells, and neural and endocrine derivatives, the neural crest is characterized by its ability to yield mesenchymal cells. In amniotes, this property is restricted to the cephalic region from the mid-diencephalon to the end of rhombomere 8 (level of somites 4/5). The cephalic neural crest is divided into two domains: an anterior region corresponding to the diencephalon, mesencephalon and metencephalon (r1, r2) in which expression of Hox genes is never observed, and a posterior domain in which neural crest cells exhibit (with a few exceptions) the same Hox code as the rhombomeres from which they originate. By altering the normal distribution of neural crest cells in the branchial arches through appropriate embryonic manipulations, we have investigated the relationships between Hox gene expression and the level of plasticity that neural crest cells display when they are led to migrate to an ectopic environment. We made the following observations. (i) Hox gene expression is not altered in neural crest cells by their transposition to ectopic sites. (ii) Expression of Hox genes by the BA ectoderm does not depend upon an induction by the neural crest. This second finding further supports the concept of segmentation of the cephalic ectoderm into ectomeres (Couly and Le Douarin, 1990). According to this concept, metameres can be defined in large bands of ectoderm including not only the CNS and the neural crest but also the corresponding superficial ectoderm fated to cover craniofacial primordia. (iii) The construction of a lower jaw requires the environment provided by the ectomesodermal components of BA1 or BA2 associated with the Hox gene non-expressing neural crest cells. Hox gene-expressing neural crest cells are unable to yield the lower jaw apparatus including the entoglossum and basihyal even in the BA1 environment. In contrast, the posterior part of the hyoid bone can be constructed by any region of the neural crest cells whether or not they are under the regulatory control of Hox genes. Such is also the case for the neural and connective tissues (including those comprising the cardiovascular system) of neural crest origin, upon which no segmental restriction is imposed. The latter finding confirms the plasticity observed 24 years ago (Le Douarin and Teillet, 1974) for the precursors of the PNS.


Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 911-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Prince ◽  
A. Lumsden

In this study we have cloned the chick Hoxa-2 gene and analysed its expression during early development. We find that Hoxa-2 has a rostral limit of expression in the rhombencephalic neural tube corresponding precisely to the boundary between rhombomeres (r)1 and 2; a limit further rostral than any other Hox gene reported to date. Neural crest migrates from r2 to populate the first branchial arch, yet although Hoxa-2 is expressed down the full dorsoventral extent of r2 during the phase of neural crest emigration, there is no Hoxa-2 expression in either the emergent neural crest or in the first branchial arch. Conversely, at the level of r4, both the neural tube and the neural crest cells, which migrate out of this rhombomere to populate the second branchial arch, express Hoxa-2. Other Hox genes expressed in the rhombencephalic neural tube demonstrate a transfer of expression from neural tube to neural crest at all axial levels of expression. Hoxa-2 is thus unusual in demonstrating separate anterior expression limits in neural tube and neural crest; this allowed us to test whether Hox gene expression patterns in neural crest are determined by migratory pathways or are prespecified by the site of origin in the neuroepithelium. Grafting experiments in which pairs of rhombomeres were transplanted to ectopic sites at the time of rhombomere boundary formation reveal a prepatterning of the neural crest with respect to Hoxa-2 expression. The decision to down-regulate Hoxa-2 expression in r2-derived neural crest, but to maintain Hoxa-2 expression in r4-derived neural crest is intrinsic to the premigratory crest cell population. Thus, following grafting of r4 to the r2 site and vice-versa, Hoxa-2 expression is maintained in r4-derived neural crest, but lost in r2-derived neural crest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document