- POST-CASCADE SHOCK WAVES INFLUENCE ON VACANCY PORES STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS

Properties and Structural Transformations of Mgb2-tapes under the Action of Plasma Shock Waves

KnE Materials Science ◽

10.18502/kms.v4i1.2149 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 250

Author(s):

B Mikhailov ◽

A Mikhailova ◽

V Y Nikulin ◽

I Borovitskaya ◽

P Silin

Keyword(s):

Shock Waves ◽

Structural Transformations ◽

Plasma Shock

.

Download Full-text

Molecular dynamics study of structural transformations of cylindrical nanopores in gold under thermal activation conditions and under the action of acoustic and shock waves

Physics of the Solid State ◽

10.1134/s106378341508017x ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 57 (8) ◽

pp. 1551-1554 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

A. V. Markidonov ◽

M. D. Starostenkov ◽

A. A. Soskov ◽

G. M. Poletaev

Keyword(s):

Molecular Dynamics ◽

Shock Waves ◽

Thermal Activation ◽

Structural Transformations ◽

And Shock Waves ◽

Activation Conditions

Download Full-text

Investigation of shock-wave deformation history from recovered structure

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100143754 ◽

1986 ◽

Vol 44 ◽

pp. 434-435

Author(s):

M.A. Mogilevsky ◽

L.S. Bushnev

Keyword(s):

Shock Wave ◽

Plastic Deformation ◽

Dislocation Density ◽

Shock Waves ◽

Shock Front ◽

Single Crystals ◽

Residual Deformation ◽

Deformation Structure ◽

Deformation History ◽

Deformation Velocity

Single crystals of Al were loaded by 15 to 40 GPa shock waves at 77 K with a pulse duration of 1.0 to 0.5 μs and a residual deformation of ∼1%. The analysis of deformation structure peculiarities allows the deformation history to be re-established.After a 20 to 40 GPa loading the dislocation density in the recovered samples was about 1010 cm-2. By measuring the thickness of the 40 GPa shock front in Al, a plastic deformation velocity of 1.07 x 108 s-1 is obtained, from where the moving dislocation density at the front is 7 x 1010 cm-2. A very small part of dislocations moves during the whole time of compression, i.e. a total dislocation density at the front must be in excess of this value by one or two orders. Consequently, due to extremely high stresses, at the front there exists a very unstable structure which is rearranged later with a noticeable decrease in dislocation density.

Download Full-text

Structural Transformation of a Germanium Σ=13 (510) [001] Tilt Grain Boundary under the Electron Beam

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100179014 ◽

1990 ◽

Vol 48 (1) ◽

pp. 52-53 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jean-Luc Rouvière ◽

Alain Bourret

Keyword(s):

Electron Microscopy ◽

High Resolution ◽

Grain Boundary ◽

Structural Transformation ◽

Mirror Symmetry ◽

High Resolution Electron Microscopy ◽

Structural Transformations ◽

Covalent Bonds ◽

Resolution Electron ◽

Tilt Grain Boundary

The possible structural transformations during the sample preparations and the sample observations are important issues in electron microscopy. Several publications of High Resolution Electron Microscopy (HREM) have reported that structural transformations and evaporation of the thin parts of a specimen could happen in the microscope. Diffusion and preferential etchings could also occur during the sample preparation.Here we report a structural transformation of a germanium Σ=13 (510) [001] tilt grain boundary that occurred in a medium-voltage electron microscopy (JEOL 400KV).Among the different (001) tilt grain boundaries whose atomic structures were entirely determined by High Resolution Electron Microscopy (Σ = 5(310), Σ = 13 (320), Σ = 13 (510), Σ = 65 (1130), Σ = 25 (710) and Σ = 41 (910), the Σ = 13 (510) interface is the most interesting. It exhibits two kinds of structures. One of them, the M-structure, has tetracoordinated covalent bonds and is periodic (fig. 1). The other, the U-structure, is also tetracoordinated but is not strictly periodic (fig. 2). It is composed of a periodically repeated constant part that separates variable cores where some atoms can have several stable positions. The M-structure has a mirror glide symmetry. At Scherzer defocus, its HREM images have characteristic groups of three big white dots that are distributed on alternatively facing right and left arcs (fig. 1). The (001) projection of the U-structure has an apparent mirror symmetry, the portions of good coincidence zones (“perfect crystal structure”) regularly separate the variable cores regions (fig. 2).

Download Full-text