Adverse Effects and Fatalities Associated with Subcutaneous Allergen Immunotherapy

2004 ◽  
pp. 736-753
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Allergen Immunotherapy

Efficacy and safety of rush immunotherapy with alumprecipitated allergens in canine atopic dermatitis

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (03) ◽  
pp. 162-173
Author(s):  
Ralf Mueller ◽  
S. Hobi
Keyword(s):  
Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Allergen Immunotherapy ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Small Animal ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Canine Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Rush Immunotherapy ◽  
Clinical Problems

Summary Objectives: Canine atopic dermatitis is a very common disease in small animal practice. Its only specific treatment is allergen immunotherapy. In rush-immunotherapy (RIT) increasing doses of allergen extract are injected subcutaneously in short intervals. Maintenance doses are achieved within one day compared to weeks or months with conventional immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RIT with alum-precipitated allergens. Materials and methods: A series of 20 dogs with atopic dermatitis underwent RIT with alum-precipitated allergens. Pruritus and medications at the start of the immunotherapy and 12 months afterwards were compared and adverse effects were recorded. Results: Significant improvement in pruritus (p = 0.0001) and medication scores (p = 0.0004) was noted after approximately 12 months of treatment. The observed clinical response was good to excellent in 70% of the dogs, consistent with other published reports. One dog vomited once during the induction day, with no other clinical problems and completion of the normal protocol. The other 19 dogs showed no adverse effects at all during or after RIT. Conclusion and clinical relevance: RIT with alum-precipitated allergens seems to be a safe and efficacious method to treat dogs with atopic dermatitis.

The Influence of Specimen Thickness in Quantitative Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

1980 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 112-113
Author(s):  
Nestor J. Zaluzec
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Energy Loss ◽  
Electron Energy ◽  
Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Light Element ◽  
Specimen Thickness ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Electron Energy Loss

The application of electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) to light element analysis is rapidly becoming an important aspect of the microcharacterization of solids in materials science, however relatively stringent requirements exist on the specimen thickness under which one can obtain EELS data due to the adverse effects of multiple inelastic scattering.1,2 This study was initiated to determine the limitations on quantitative analysis of EELS data due to specimen thickness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document