Tissue Engineering Alternatives to Joint Replacement

2005 ◽  
pp. 721-760
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Joint Replacement

scholarly journals Synthetic Versus Tissue-Engineered Implants for Joint Replacement

2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 179-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncan E. T. Shepherd ◽  
Godfrey Azangwe
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
The Body ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Joint Surface ◽  
Synovial Joint ◽  
Synovial Joints ◽  
Synthetic Materials ◽  
Artificial Joint Replacement

Human synovial joints are remarkable as they can last for a lifetime. However, they can be affected by disease that may lead to destruction of the joint surface. The most common treatment in the advanced stages of joint disease is artificial joint replacement, where the diseased synovial joint is replaced with an artificial implant made from synthetic materials, such as metals and polymers. A new technique for repairing diseased synovial joints is tissue engineering where cells are used to grow replacement tissue. This paper explores the relative merits of synthetic and tissue-engineered implants, using joint replacement as an example. Synthetic joint replacement is a well-established procedure with the advantages of early mobilisation, pain relief and high patient satisfaction. However, synthetic implants are not natural tissues; they can cause adverse reactions to the body and there could be a mismatch in mechanical properties compared to natural tissues. Tissue-engineered implants offer great potential and have major advantages over synthetic implants as they are natural tissue, which should ensure that they are totally biocompatible, have the correct mechanical properties and integrate well with the existing tissue. However, there are still many limitations to be addressed in tissue engineering such as scaling up for production, bioreactor design, appropriate regulation and the potential for disease to attack the new tissue-engineered implant.

scholarly journals Design of an Endoreactor for the Cultivation of a Joint-Like-Structure

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. May ◽  
J. L. Herder ◽  
J. H. Kuiper ◽  
S. Roberts ◽  
S. Sivananthan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Compliant Mechanism ◽  
Dynamic Compression ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
Loading Frequency ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Cartilage Formation ◽  
And Cartilage

To avoid revision surgeries in artificial joint replacements and to allow young people to have a joint replacement, using biological joint replacement created by tissue engineering is a promising alternative. Several research groups have tissue engineered bone [Warnke 2004] and cartilage [Chung 2007] separately. The tissue engineering of a joint, consisting of bone and cartilage is the next frontier. The present study focuses on the design of a novel device, named Endoreactor, that is employing the mechanosensitivity of cells to create a joint-like-structure (JLS) consisting of a bone and cartilage sandwich, similar to an amphiarthrosis, by applying a mechanical loading regime to a stem cell seeded scaffold construct during endocultivation. This way, the patients who will eventually need the new joint will serve as their own bioreactor, having the joint grow in their own body. In the JLS, the outside layers are designed to become bone, using a 6 mm thick scaffold with high stiffness. The center layer is a 4 mm thick scaffold which is compliant so as to experience more strain than the outside scaffolds to stimulate cartilage formation. Compression is realized by placing the JLSs between the long links of a kite-shaped four-bar linkage. This Endoreactor is powered by natural body motion through connection to the musculoskeletal system of the host, which in the experimental phase is a Gottingen minipig. The loading frequency and rest versus active time is dictated by the activity level of the minipig. This results in a natural loading pattern that is employed for the stimulation of cartilage formation in the JLS. A tensile force created during ambulation is converted into compressive action between the two long links of the mechanism. A mechanical stop limits the motion. This way controlled intermittent dynamic compression between 2.5% and 12.5% is realized in the cartilage layer of the JLS. All functions are integrated into a single piece compliant mechanism which is produced out of titanium using 3D rapid prototyping by selective laser melting technology. The mechanism can be fitted with cages that hold the scaffolds for bone and cartilage in place and protect them from external loads while being implanted. A safety spring was added to accommodate for large actuation excursions. A number of prototypes were produced and tested for fatigue, plastic deformation, failure load, and displacements of the long links at the JLS locations under different axial loads. These tests confirmed the proper mechanical functioning of the Endoreactor. Work with animal models making use of the device to culture an amphiarthosis-like joint is foreseen in the near future. This work was carried out at part of MYJOINT: Living Bioreactor—Growing a New Joint in a Human Back, EU FP6-2004-NEST-C-1, Proposal No. 028861.

scholarly journals Approximate Optimization Study of Light Curing Waterborne Polyurethane Materials for the Construction of 3D Printed Cytocompatible Cartilage Scaffolds

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (22) ◽  
pp. 6804
Author(s):  
Yi-Wen Chen ◽  
Ming-You Shie ◽  
Wen-Ching Chang ◽  
Yu-Fang Shen
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Cell Attachment ◽  
Cartilage Tissue Engineering ◽  
Cartilage Regeneration ◽  
Friction Reduction ◽  
Cartilage Tissue ◽  
Light Curing

Articular cartilage, which is a white transparent tissue with 1–2 mm thickness, is located in the interface between the two hard bones. The main functions of articular cartilage are stress transmission, absorption, and friction reduction. The cartilage cannot be repaired and regenerated once it has been damaged, and it needs to be replaced by artificial joints. Many approaches, such as artificial joint replacement, hyaluronic acid injection, microfracture surgery and cartilage tissue engineering have been applied in clinical treatment. Basically, some of these approaches are foreign material implantation for joint replacement to reach the goal of pain reduction and mechanism support. This study demonstrated another frontier in the research of cartilage reconstruction by applying regeneration medicine additive manufacturing (3D Printing) and stem cell technology. Light curing materials have been modified and tested to be printable and cytocompatible for stem cells in this research. Design of experiments (DOE) is adapted in this investigation to search for the optimal manufacturing parameter for biocompatible scaffold fabrication and stem cell attachment and growth. Based on the results, an optimal working process of biocompatible and printable scaffolds for cartilage regeneration is reported. We expect this study will facilitate the development of cartilage tissue engineering.

Decellularized bone extracellular matrix in skeletal tissue engineering

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 755-764
Author(s):  
Benjamin B. Rothrauff ◽  
Rocky S. Tuan
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Tissue Regeneration ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Regenerative Capacity ◽  
Skeletal Tissue ◽  
Large Bone

Bone possesses an intrinsic regenerative capacity, which can be compromised by aging, disease, trauma, and iatrogenesis (e.g. tumor resection, pharmacological). At present, autografts and allografts are the principal biological treatments available to replace large bone segments, but both entail several limitations that reduce wider use and consistent success. The use of decellularized extracellular matrices (ECM), often derived from xenogeneic sources, has been shown to favorably influence the immune response to injury and promote site-appropriate tissue regeneration. Decellularized bone ECM (dbECM), utilized in several forms — whole organ, particles, hydrogels — has shown promise in both in vitro and in vivo animal studies to promote osteogenic differentiation of stem/progenitor cells and enhance bone regeneration. However, dbECM has yet to be investigated in clinical studies, which are needed to determine the relative efficacy of this emerging biomaterial as compared with established treatments. This mini-review highlights the recent exploration of dbECM as a biomaterial for skeletal tissue engineering and considers modifications on its future use to more consistently promote bone regeneration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document