scholarly journals Targeting Lymph Node Retrieval and Assessment in Stage II Colon Cancer: A Quality Outcome Community-Based Cancer Center Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Grote ◽  
Amy H. Hughes ◽  
Cathy C. Rimmer ◽  
Dale A. Less ◽  
Amy P. Abernethy ◽  
...  

Purpose Adequate lymph node evaluation is required for the proper staging of colon cancer. The current recommended number of lymph nodes that should be retrieved and assessed is 12. Methods The multidisciplinary Gastrointestinal Tumor Board at the Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Regional Cancer Center reviewed and recommended that a minimum of 12 lymph nodes be examined in all cases of colon cancer to ensure proper staging. This recommendation occurred at the end of the first quarter of 2005. To ensure this new standard was being followed, an outcomes study looking at the number of lymph nodes evaluated in stage II colon cancer was initiated. All patients with stage II colon cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2006 were reviewed. Results There was a statistically significant improvement in the number of stage II colon cancer patients with 12 or more lymph nodes evaluated. Before the Gastrointestinal Tumor Board's recommendation, 49% (40 out of 82 patients) had 12 or more lymph nodes sampled. The median number of lymph nodes evaluated was 11. After the Gastrointestinal Tumor Board's recommendation, 79% (70 out of 88 patients) had 12 or more lymph nodes sampled. The median number of lymph nodes was 16. Conclusion Multidisciplinary tumor boards can impact the quality of care of patients as demonstrated in this study. Although we do not yet have survival data on these patients, based on the previous literature referenced in this article, we would expect to see an improvement in survival rates in patients with 12 or more nodes retrieved and assessed.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6524-6524
Author(s):  
B. Curley ◽  
M. A. O'Grady ◽  
S. Litwin ◽  
K. Stitzenberg ◽  
H. Armitage ◽  
...  

6524 Background: The retrieval of ≥12 lymph nodes in a colorectal cancer surgical specimen is an established quality metric. The impact of targeted education to improve nodal yield at community hospitals has not been studied. We initiated an intensive educational program through the Fox Chase Cancer Center Partner (FCCCP) hospitals to improve nodal retrieval in colon cancer specimens. Methods: At 12 FCCCP community hospitals from 2004–05, educational initiatives were conducted by FCCC staff and included group presentations at hospital tumor boards, cancer and quality committees, and regional CME. Individual presentations to pathologists and surgeons were held. Tumor registry data were retrospectively collected from FCCCP from 2003 (pre-intervention) to 2006 (post-intervention) for patients undergoing curative colon cancer surgery. Data abstracted were age, sex, race, stage, surgical procedure, and total number of nodes examined. The primary end point was % surgical specimens with ≥12 lymph nodes. Obtaining at least 250 records per year would allow ≥90% power to detect a change from a baseline level of ∼40% to ≥50% after intervention. Results: Data from 4,208 patients from 12 FCCCP hospitals were collected. Overall characteristics: male/female (48%/52%), race (W 83%, AA 7%, other 10%), age (<50:6%, 50–70: 34%, >70:60%), node ± (39%/61%). The % of colon cancer operations with ≥12 nodes significantly increased over the four years of the study (Table, p<.00001). This difference persisted when pooling years before and after the intervention (2003–04 vs. 2005–06, p <0.0001). There was no difference in nodal yield between two pre-intervention years (2003 vs. 2004, p=0.1). No differences in other characteristics such as age, sex, race, or % lymph node positive were noted between years. Conclusions: A multi-intervention targeted educational initiative in a large community cancer network is feasible and associated with increased colon cancer nodal retrieval. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-50
Author(s):  
M. Yu. Fedyanin ◽  
A. A. Tryakin ◽  
A. A. Bulanov ◽  
S. S. Gordeev ◽  
D. V. Kuzmichev ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 601-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorg Tschmelitsch ◽  
David S. Klimstra ◽  
Alfred M. Cohen

2009 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 525-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.C. Earle ◽  
M.R. Weiser ◽  
A. Ter Veer ◽  
J.M. Skibber ◽  
J. Wilson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18582-e18582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng-ju Chen ◽  
Ting-ting Sun ◽  
Tian-le Li ◽  
Irene Dankwa-Mullan ◽  
Alexandra Urman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document