Lateral Load Behavior of an Open-Ground-Story RC Building with AAC Infills in Upper Stories

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 1653-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supratik Bose ◽  
Durgesh C. Rai
Keyword(s):  
Brick Masonry ◽  
Hysteretic Behavior ◽  
Analytical Models ◽  
Rc Frame ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Rc Frames ◽  
Open Ground ◽  
Strength And Stiffness ◽  
Infilled Rc Frames ◽  
Masonry Infilled Rc Frames

Autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry infills in upper stories can be beneficial for improving the seismic response of open-ground-story (OGS), reinforced concrete (RC)–frame buildings. Two reduced 1:2.5-scale models of single-story, single-bay RC frames with and without AAC infill masonry were tested for resistance properties and hysteretic behavior. Low strength and stiffness of AAC masonry, about half of the conventional brick masonry, led to improved load sharing between the infill and the frame, which helped an early development of frame yield mechanism for enhanced energy dissipation. Test results were used to evaluate the reliability of using existing strength and stiffness relations of conventional masonry infilled RC frames for AAC infilled frames. Analytical models were developed to predict the observed hysteretic behavior of tested specimens. Nonlinear analyses of a five-story, four-bay OGS-RC frame were performed for conventional brick masonry infills and relatively softer and weaker AAC infills in upper stories. The results indicated that the undesirable effect of weak/soft ground story mechanism of OGS-RC frames can be reduced to an acceptable level by using AAC infills in upper stories.

scholarly journals Numerical Modelling and Validation of the Response of Masonry Infilled RC Frames Using Experimental Testing Results

Buildings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianrocco Mucedero ◽  
Daniele Perrone ◽  
Emanuele Brunesi ◽  
Ricardo Monteiro
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Modelling ◽  
Experimental Testing ◽  
Experimental Tests ◽  
Masonry Infill ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Rc Frames ◽  
Mediterranean Countries ◽  
Modelling Uncertainties ◽  
Infilled Rc Frames ◽  
Masonry Infilled Rc Frames

Reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings with masonry infills represent one of the most common structural typologies worldwide. Although, in the past, masonry infills were frequently considered as non-structural elements and their interaction with the structure was neglected, earthquakes occurring over the last decades have demonstrated the important role of these elements in the seismic response of all RC-infilled building typologies. In this regard, the selection of the most suitable numerical modelling approaches to reproduce the hysteretic response of the masonry infills—and their interaction with the RC frames—is still an open issue. To deal with this issue, in this study, a macro-classification based on different available databases of experimental tests on infilled RC frames, is firstly proposed to understand the variability in the infill properties and the corresponding numerical modelling uncertainties. Five masonry infill types are selected as representative for the typical existing configurations in Italy and other Mediterranean countries. Three of those masonry infill types are then selected to carry out a more detailed analysis, namely their numerical modelling validation using experimental testing results, considering and comparing the main formulations available in the literature for the definition of the hysteretic behaviour of infills. From such a comparison, the model that minimizes the prediction error, according to specific features of the selected masonry infill, is identified for each masonry infill type.

Experimental Evaluation of Masonry-Infilled RC Frames

1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armin B. Mehrabi ◽  
P. Benson Shing ◽  
Michael P. Schuller ◽  
James L. Noland
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Evaluation ◽  
Rc Frames ◽  
Infilled Rc Frames ◽  
Masonry Infilled Rc Frames

scholarly journals Numerical Modeling of Masonry-infilled RC Frame

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiana A. Filippou ◽  
Nicholas C. Kyriakides ◽  
Christis Z. Chrysostomou
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Numerical Model ◽  
Constitutive Models ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Rc Frame ◽  
Initial Stiffness ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Rc Frames ◽  
Rc Frame Structures ◽  
Infilled Rc Frames

Background: The behavior of masonry-infilled Reinforced Concrete (RC) frame structures during an earthquake, has attracted the attention of structural engineers since the 1950s. Experimental and numerical studies have been carried out to investigate the behavior of masonry-infilled RC frame under in-plane loading. Objective: This paper presents a numerical model of the behavior existing masonry-infilled RC frame that was studied experimentally at the University of Patra. The objective of the present study is to identify suitable numerical constitutive models for each component of the structural system in order to create a numerical tool to model the masonry infilled RC frames in-plane behavior by accounting the frame-infill separation. Methods: A 2D masonry-infilled RC frame was developed in DIANA Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software and an eigenvalue and nonlinear structural cyclic analyses were performed. It is a 2:3 scale three-story structure with non-seismic design and detailing, subjected to in-plane cyclic loading through displacement control analysis. Results: There is a good agreement between the numerical model and experimental results through a nonlinear cyclic analysis. It was found that the numerical model has the capability to predict the initial stiffness, the ultimate stiffness, the maximum shear-force capacity, cracking- patterns and the possible failure mode of masonry-infilled RC frame. Conclusion: Therefore, this model is a reliable model of the behavior of masonry-infilled RC frame under cyclic loading including the frame-infill separation (gap opening).

The Effects of Amount and Location of Openings on Lateral Behavior of Masonry Infilled RC Frames

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 2175-2187
Author(s):  
Elshan Ahani ◽  
Mir Naghi Mousavi ◽  
Ali Ahani ◽  
Mohammad Kheirollahi
Keyword(s):  
Rc Frames ◽  
Infilled Rc Frames ◽  
Masonry Infilled Rc Frames ◽  
Lateral Behavior

scholarly journals Effects of Single and Multi Openings in Brick Infills on the Seismic Response of Infilled RC Frames

2018 ◽  
Vol 215 ◽  
pp. 01036
Author(s):  
Maidiawati ◽  
Jafril Tanjung ◽  
Hamdeni Medriosa ◽  
Yulia Hayati
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Dissipated Energy ◽  
Rc Frame ◽  
Infilled Frames ◽  
Masonry Infill ◽  
Infilled Frame ◽  
Rc Frames ◽  
Central Opening ◽  
Lateral Strength ◽  
Infilled Rc Frames

Many researchers have performed a lot of studies of the seismic behavior reinforced concrete (RC) frame with masonry infill. They found that masonry infill affects the lateral strength, stiffness and ductility performance of the RC frame structures. However, when openings appeared in the panel infill for door and windows, the responses of the overall structure are entirely changed. The primary purpose of this study is to experimentally investigate the behavior of brick infilled RC frames possessing single opening and two openings. Four specimens of 1/4-scale single bay RC frames with brick infills were made that were one bare frame, one frame with full infill and two frames with infills having a central opening and two openings with the opening ratio of 25%. The specimens were tested under lateral reversed cyclic loads. Consequently, different responses of failure mechanism, lateral strength, stiffness and energy dissipated were observed among the specimens. The brick full infill failed in shear with propagation cracks in central part of the panel, but in the case of the infills with single and two openings, the cracks were dominated at the corners of the openings. The in-plane strength, stiffness and dissipated energy of infilled frames decreased when openings appeared in the panel. However, the seismic performance of brick infilled frame with the opening of 25% of panel area is better than those of bare frame. The brick infilled frames with a central opening and two openings are similar in lateral strength and dissipated energy. It seems that area and position of the openings control the seismic response to the overall infilled frame structure of the openings

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document