The Performance of Steel-Frame Buildings with Infill Masonry Walls in the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 43-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald O. Hamburger ◽  
John D. Meyer

Following the great 1906 San Francisco earthquake and fire, engineers recognized the superior performance of buildings with complete vertical load–carrying steel frames and infill masonry walls. These buildings were noteworthy in their ability to survive both the ground shaking and fire, many remaining in service today. Observation of this superior performance led many California structural engineers to believe that steel frames were the best structural system for resisting earthquake damage, in turn, leading to a proliferation of steel-frame construction in California cities. Not until the 1994 Northridge earthquake did many California engineers recognize that steel-frame structures can and do experience severe earthquake damage. The performance capability of early steel-frame buildings with infill masonry walls, however, remains unclear, despite improved understanding of their structural response characteristics.

2019 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 665-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Soheil Ghobadi ◽  
Roohollah Ahmady Jazany ◽  
Hamidreza Farshchi

2018 ◽  
Vol 763 ◽  
pp. 116-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Ferraioli ◽  
Angelo Lavino ◽  
Alberto Mandara ◽  
Marianna Donciglio ◽  
Antonio Formisano

In this paper, a design procedure that combines both progressive collapse design under column removal scenario and capacity design to produce a hierarchy of design strengths is presented. The procedure develops in the context of the European Standards, using the classification of European steel sections and considering the seismic design features. Three-dimensional models of typical multi-storey steel frame buildings are employed in numerical analysis. The design for progressive collapse is carried out with three types of analysis, namely linear static, nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic. Since the behaviour following sudden column loss is likely to be inelastic and possibly implicate catenary effects, both geometric and material nonlinearities are considered. The influence of the fundamental parameters involved in seismic and robustness design is finally investigated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document