scholarly journals Response of Seismically Isolated Steel Frame Buildings with Sustainable Lead-Rubber Bearing (LRB) Isolator Devices Subjected to Near-Fault (NF) Ground Motions

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Hu
2018 ◽  
Vol 763 ◽  
pp. 116-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Ferraioli ◽  
Angelo Lavino ◽  
Alberto Mandara ◽  
Marianna Donciglio ◽  
Antonio Formisano

In this paper, a design procedure that combines both progressive collapse design under column removal scenario and capacity design to produce a hierarchy of design strengths is presented. The procedure develops in the context of the European Standards, using the classification of European steel sections and considering the seismic design features. Three-dimensional models of typical multi-storey steel frame buildings are employed in numerical analysis. The design for progressive collapse is carried out with three types of analysis, namely linear static, nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic. Since the behaviour following sudden column loss is likely to be inelastic and possibly implicate catenary effects, both geometric and material nonlinearities are considered. The influence of the fundamental parameters involved in seismic and robustness design is finally investigated.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Musa Mazji Till Abadi ◽  
Behnam Adhami

<p>In this study, the function and application of seismic isolation system through lead rubber bearing isolator (LRB) in near-fault earthquakes are compared with fixed-base structures. As a result of their high frequency content, near-fault earthquakes impose huge energy on structures and cause severe damages. One of the appropriate solutions for this issue is the use of LRB which decreases the amount of imposed energy on structures. To improve the function of isolated structures under the near-fault earthquakes, isolators are designed in a way to tolerate the vertical component of earthquakes. To this purpose, we limit the displacements due to the horizontal movements of isolator through Gap spring which acts as a retaining wall and prevent shocks to other buildings. Moreover, this approach decreases the vertical movements of isolators and indirectly improves their behavior. In the current study, three buildings with four, eight, and 12 floors (with and without gap spring) were included. Isolators were manually designed in accordance with AASHTO-LRB regulations and the behaviors of both isolators and buildings are considered non-linear. Then we analyzed and compared the amount of energy, displacement, and acceleration of structure at the center of roof. The results indicated a significant decrease in the results of base shear, the acceleration of roof center, floors drift and energy imposed on the structure in the isolated system in comparison with the fixed-base structure.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document