scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of current and optimal treatment for schizophrenia

2003 ◽  
Vol 183 (5) ◽  
pp. 427-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin Andrews ◽  
Kristy Sanderson ◽  
Justine Corry ◽  
Cathy Issakidis ◽  
Helen Lapsley
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Optimal Treatment ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Life Years Lost ◽  
Years Lived With Disability ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Similar Cost

BackgroundThis paper is part of a project to identify the proportion of the burden of each mental disorder averted by current and optimal interventions, and the cost-effectiveness of both.AimsTo use epidemiological data on schizophrenia to model the cost-effectiveness of current and optimal treatment.MethodCalculate the burden of schizophrenia in the years lived with disability (YLD) component of disability-adjusted life-years lost, the proportion averted by current interventions, the proportion that could be averted by optimal treatment and the cost-effectiveness of both.ResultsCurrent interventions avert some 13% of the burden, whereas 22% could be averted by optimal treatment. Current interventions cost about AUS$200 000 per YLD averted, whereas optimal treatment at a similar cost could increase the number of YLDs averted by two-thirds. Even so, the majority of the burden of schizophrenia remains unavertable.ConclusionsOptimal treatment is affordable within the present budget and should be implemented.

scholarly journals Cost Effectiveness Analysis Using Disability-Adjusted Life Years for Cataract Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (16) ◽  
pp. 6010
Author(s):  
Thinni Nurul Rochmah ◽  
Anggun Wulandari ◽  
Maznah Dahlui ◽  
Ernawaty ◽  
Ratna Dwi Wulandari
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Ratio ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

Cataracts are the second most prioritized eye disease in the world. Cataracts are an expensive treatment because surgery is the only method that can treat the disease. This study aims to analyze the cost effectiveness of each operating procedure. Specifically, phacoemulsification and Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS) with Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) as the effectiveness indicator is used. This study is an observational analytic study with a prospective framework. The sample size is 130 patients who have undergone phacoemulsification and 25 patients who have undergone SICS. The DALY for phacoemulsification at Day-7 (D-7) is 0.3204, and at Day-21 (D-21), it is 0.3204, while the DALY for SICS at D-7 is 0.3060, and at D-21, it is 0.3158. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for cataract surgery at D-7 is USD $1872.49, and at D-21, it is USD $5861.71, whereas the Indonesian Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is USD $4174.90. In conclusion, the phacoemulsification technique is more cost effective than the SICS technique. The ICER value is very cost effective at D-7 post-surgery compared to at D-21 post-surgery because the ICER is less than 1 GDP per capita per DALY.

CRUCIAL FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF UNIVERSAL HEPATITIS B IMMUNIZATION IN INDIA

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charu Prakash
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Latin Hypercube Sampling ◽  
Hypothetical Cohort ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

This study examines the parameters crucial to cost-effectiveness of universal hepatitis B immunization in India. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was done using a decision tree (Markov model) to follow up a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 newborns for the effects of hepatitis B acquired vertically at birth. The measure of effectiveness was disability-adjusted life-years gained. Uncertainty analysis and Scenario analysis were done using Latin hypercube sampling. Hepatitis B endemicity is the most important factor, followed by the cost of vaccine. Other factors of some influence are vaccination coverage, vaccine efficacy, HBeAg positivity, and vaccine wastage.

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of BCG Vaccination against Tuberculosis in Indonesia: A Model-Based Study

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 707
Author(s):  
Afifah Machlaurin ◽  
Franklin Christiaan Karel Dolk ◽  
Didik Setiawan ◽  
Tjipke Sytse van der Werf ◽  
Maarten J. Postma
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Control Programme ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Bcg Vaccination ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG), the only available vaccine for tuberculosis (TB), has been applied for decades. The Indonesian government recently introduced a national TB disease control programme that includes several action plans, notably enhanced vaccination coverage, which can be strengthened through underpinning its favourable cost-effectiveness. We designed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of Indonesia’s current BCG vaccination programme. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were evaluated from the perspectives of both society and healthcare. The robustness of the analysis was confirmed through univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Using epidemiological data compiled for Indonesia, BCG vaccination at a price US$14 was estimated to be a cost-effective strategy in controlling TB disease. From societal and healthcare perspectives, ICERs were US$104 and US$112 per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively. The results were robust for variations of most variables in the univariate analysis. Notably, the vaccine’s effectiveness regarding disease protection, vaccination costs, and case detection rates were key drivers for cost-effectiveness. The PSA results indicated that vaccination was cost-effective even at US$175 threshold in 95% of cases, approximating the monthly GDP per capita. Our findings suggest that this strategy was highly cost-effective and merits prioritization and extension within the national TB programme. Our results may be relevant for other high endemic low- and middle-income countries.

scholarly journals Burden of Stroke in Myanmar

2021 ◽  
pp. 49-51
Author(s):  
Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian ◽  
Yee Mon Khine ◽  
Ohnmar Ohnmar ◽  
Myat Po Po Kyaw Khin ◽  
Min Thit Win
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Stroke Units ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Lower Blood ◽  
Life Years Lost ◽  
Standardized Mortality Rate ◽  
Age And Sex

Myanmar is home to over 51 million people. The age- and sex-standardized mortality rate due to stroke is 165.4/100,000, while the rate of age- and sex-standardized disability-adjusted life years lost due to stroke is 2971.3/100,000. The prevalence of stroke among adults aged 40–99 years is 1.5%. Stroke is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality and comprises 20% of the neurological workload. There are only 10 stroke units in the whole country. Doctors are aware of the importance of hypertension in stroke prevention and the need for physiotherapy after stroke, but, until recently and in rural areas, they also tend to use steroids and neuroprotectants, and lower blood pressure aggressively acutely after stroke; antiplatelets are not widely used. Thrombolysis service is available at some tertiary centers but mechanical thrombectomy is not yet available.

scholarly journals Non-Spinal Causes of Back Pain: An ‘undiagnosed’ diagnosis

2019 ◽  
pp. e000172
Author(s):  
Shakti Goel
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Working Population ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Common Ailment ◽  
Life Years Lost

Low back pain is a common ailment affecting individuals all around the globe. Majority of Disability Adjusted Life Years lost amongst working population is due to low back pain. Though majority of surgeons/physicians keep only spinal causes in mind while treating such an ailments, a number of other causes exist for such a pathology. This editorial aims to make the readers aware about such non spinal causes of low back pain.

scholarly journals Using QALYs versus DALYs to measure cost-effectiveness: How much does it matter?

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Feng ◽  
David D. Kim ◽  
Joshua T. Cohen ◽  
Peter J. Neumann ◽  
Daniel A. Ollendorf
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Disability Weights ◽  
Disability Adjusted Life ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Relative Differences ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

ObjectivesQuality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) are commonly used in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to measure health benefits. We sought to quantify and explain differences between QALY- and DALY-based cost-effectiveness ratios, and explore whether using one versus the other would materially affect conclusions about an intervention's cost-effectiveness.MethodsWe identified CEAs using both QALYs and DALYs from the Tufts Medical Center CEA Registry and Global Health CEA Registry, with a supplemental search to ensure comprehensive literature coverage. We calculated absolute and relative differences between the QALY- and DALY-based ratios, and compared ratios to common benchmarks (e.g., 1× gross domestic product per capita). We converted reported costs into US dollars.ResultsAmong eleven published CEAs reporting both QALYs and DALYs, seven focused on pharmaceuticals and infectious disease, and five were conducted in high-income countries. Four studies concluded that the intervention was “dominant” (cost-saving). Among the QALY- and DALY-based ratios reported from the remaining seven studies, absolute differences ranged from approximately $2 to $15,000 per unit of benefit, and relative differences from 6–120 percent, but most differences were modest in comparison with the ratio value itself. The values assigned to utility and disability weights explained most observed differences. In comparison with cost-effectiveness thresholds, conclusions were consistent regardless of the ratio type in ten of eleven cases.ConclusionsOur results suggest that although QALY- and DALY-based ratios for the same intervention can differ, differences tend to be modest and do not materially affect comparisons to common cost-effectiveness thresholds.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document