scholarly journals Neurodiversity in the teaching of the mental state examination: a pilot study of interactive mind-mapping seminars for the new ScotGem (Scottish graduate-entry medicine) students during the COVID-19 pandemic

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S10-S11
Author(s):  
Kathleen Breslin ◽  
Sara Mohsen ◽  
Praveen Kumar

AimsAgility in educational delivery has been catalyzed in response to national restrictions mandated by the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Increased use of assistive technologies further aligns with the General Medical Council's aims that medical educators provide an 'accessible training experience'. The study examined medical students' receptiveness to different types of interactive teaching. Two undergraduate cohorts received teaching on the Mental State Examination, either socially-distanced delivered by traditional powerpoint or remotely by mind-mapping software on a tablet hand-held digital device. We required an effective program which would retain the popular interactive elements of Psychiatry teaching and promote inclusivity across students' diverse learning styles.MethodTwo cohorts of Year 2 students from the Universities of Dundee and St Andrew's Scottish Graduate-Entry Medicine (scotGEM) course took part in an Introduction to Psychiatry seminar which involved a presentation of the Mental State Examination. One was conducted in a face-to-face setting via traditional PowerPoint. The second was conducted via remote-conferencing with mindmaps of key concepts drawn and screen-shared live to students as teaching progressed.This was a qualitative study, with online links to questionnaires for 24 student participants across 5 domains. (1. The tutorial met my learning objectives, 2. The format was suitable for me, 3. The balance of theory and cases was suitable for me, 4. The tutorial was of appropriate length, 5. I was satisfied with the performance) Response options included: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree. A section was also included with open-ended questions pooled for thematic analysis.ResultResponse rate reached >60% with >80% respondents answering strongly agree across all domains. Thematic results demonstrated positive responses across both teaching sessions, with the interactive elements valued by students. Comments included: “great job was done with the delivery of the session considering it was online rather than in person”; “drawing element was fantastic”; “Good: interactivity of the session drawing and creativity element”.ConclusionThe Mental State Examination (MSE) via live-drawn mind-maps allows salient clinical information to be conceptualised in non-linear diagramatic format. This paediological approach can offer further access points across wide range of learning styles. This pilot study demonstrated such interactive components of Psychiatry teaching continue to be well received and can be effectively delivered remotely. Such sessions also serve to promote inclusivity, linking those who are geographically distant in addition to the visual learner and the neurodiverse. We aim to incorporate these dynamic teaching sessions into our online induction programs and disseminate Intelligent Tutorials to our remote and rural learners throughout Scotland.

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari ◽  
Soofia Naghdi ◽  
Scott Hasson ◽  
Leala Valizadeh ◽  
Shohreh Jalaie

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 657-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cíntia Fuzikawa ◽  
Maria Fernanda Lima-Costa ◽  
Elizabeth Uchôa ◽  
Kenneth Shulman

Background: The aim of the study was to determine the correlation and agreement between the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clock Drawing Test (CDT), administered and scored using Shulman's method (2000), in elderly Brazilian adults with very low levels of formal education.Methods: CDT and MMSE tests, performed by a sample of 1118 elderly subjects from a population-based cohort, were evaluated. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated for the total sample and according to gender, age and schooling level. Agreement was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.Results: CDTs with high scores had high corresponding MMSE scores whereas CDTs with low scores had a wide range of corresponding MMSE scores. Correlation was moderate (ρ = 0.64) and no difference was found according to gender, age or schooling level. For CDT cut-off 3/4, the best MMSE cut-off was 27/28 and agreement between tests was 75.1%.Conclusions: Correlation between tests was moderate. Subjects who performed well on the CDT could be expected to obtain high MMSE scores. Although one test does not substitute for the other, the CDT may be more practical in developing countries where resources are limited and low education is common in the elderly, as well as in situations where time for assessment or screening is limited. Moreover, the CDT may be sensitive to cognitive domains not assessed by the MMSE.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S133-S133
Author(s):  
Gianluca Di Pasqua ◽  
Pranav Mahajan

AimsAs medical education becomes increasingly digital, there is a plethora of readily available video resources available to medical students, aimed at teaching a wide range of topics. Despite this abundance, students report a myriad of issues. These range from videos containing outdated material, being of a poor production quality, and not being entirely relevant to their learning objectives. The aim of this study is to explore student thoughts and perceptions of videos as a teaching and learning resource. As the Mental State Examination is a component of the Psychiatry curriculum that students often find difficult, we have written, filmed and produced a video series explaining and demonstrating it.MethodFollowing the production of the Mental State Examination videos at the University of Sheffield – which contained multiple doctor-patient consultations, interspersed with narration outlining the key learning points – three focus groups were undertaken. These were aimed at understanding student thoughts and perception on the new videos, and the use of videos in medical education in general. Taking a qualitative approach, thematic analysis was performed on the content of the focus groups.ResultThere was universal positive feedback about the structure and content of the videos we had produced; students enjoyed observing the various doctor-patient consultations and felt the separate elements of the Mental State Examination was explained logically and concisely. Furthermore, students appreciated that the videos were produced at their own University, believing this added to their validity. With regards to videos as a teaching resource in general, focus groups revealed that students appreciated specific, relevant and novel video material. Most students felt that videos can play an important role in medical education. There was a unanimous belief however that videos used in medical education should be produced well and be factually correct.ConclusionUnderstanding how students feel about videos as a teaching and learning resource is crucial in the development of more in the future. This study suggests more video resources for many areas, both within Psychiatry, and within the greater sphere of medical education, would be welcomed. This ought to be accompanied with student evaluation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Kaiser ◽  
Renate Gusner-Pfeiffer ◽  
Hermann Griessenberger ◽  
Bernhard Iglseder

Im folgenden Artikel werden fünf verschiedene Versionen der Mini-Mental-State-Examination dargestellt, die alle auf der Grundlage des Originals von Folstein erstellt wurden, sich jedoch deutlich voneinander unterscheiden und zu unterschiedlichen Ergebnissen kommen, unabhängig davon, ob das Screening von erfahrenen Untersuchern durchgeführt wird oder nicht. Besonders auffällig ist, dass Frauen die Aufgaben «Wort rückwärts» hoch signifikant besser lösten als das «Reihenrechnen». An Hand von Beispielen werden Punkteunterschiede aufgezeigt.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document