First time-lapse OBN in Bonga deepwater offshore field

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 661-667
Author(s):  
Understanding Aikulola ◽  
Oke Okpobia ◽  
Arinze Okonkwo ◽  
Idris Yamusa ◽  
Emmanuel Saragoussi ◽  
...  

Time-lapse seismic data from Bonga Field, located in deepwater Nigeria, have delivered excellent results previously from dedicated streamer seismic surveys (2000, 2008, and 2012) that image changes in amplitude due to water replacing oil. One challenge with the streamer data is the presence of a floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) unit. It is difficult to accurately repeat streamer acquisition geometry in economically important updip regions of reservoirs that lie beneath the FPSO. To ensure an accurate repeat of this area, we acquired an ocean-bottom node (OBN) survey in 2010 and carried out the first time-lapse OBN repeat of the survey in 2018. Time-lapse processing of the OBN data produced excellent results. We obtained an OBN-on-OBN normalized root mean square (NRMS) difference repeatability of 6%. This was an improvement over the 12% NRMS for streamer-on-streamer repeats. The OBN data quality was unaffected by the FPSO, enabling us to properly image the changes occurring in this area. The 4D OBN interpretation was used to identify bypassed oil opportunities. The data also were used to derisk well placement, optimize water injection, and update the dynamic reservoir models. The new models are essential to enhance predictability and field performance. We also analyzed an area northwest of the field where we extended the 2018 OBN acquisition and compared it to streamer data to optimize a new injection well location.

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 494-501
Author(s):  
Jean-Paul van Gestel

In 2019, the fourth ocean-bottom-node survey was acquired over Atlantis Field. This survey was quickly processed to provide useful time-lapse (4D) observations two months after the end of the acquisition. The time-lapse observations were immediately valuable in placing wells, refining final drilling target locations, updating well prioritization, and sequencing production and water-injection wells. These data are indispensable pieces of information that bring geophysicists and reservoir engineers together and focus the conversation on key remaining uncertainties such as fault transmissibilities and drainage areas. Time-lapse observations can confirm the key conceptional models already in place but are even more valuable when they highlight alternative models that have not yet been considered. The lessons learned from the acquisition, processing, analysis, interpretation, and integration of the data are shared. Some of these lessons are reiterations of previous work, but several new lessons originated from the latest 2019 acquisition. This was the first survey in which independent simultaneous sources were successfully deployed to collect a time-lapse survey. This resulted in a much faster and less expensive acquisition. In addition, full-waveform inversion was used as the main tool to update the velocity model, enabling a much faster turnaround in processing. The fast turnaround enabled incorporation of the latest acquisition to better constrain the velocity model update. The updated velocity model was used for the final time-lapse migration. In the integration part, the 4D-assisted history-match workflow was engaged to update the reservoir model history match. All of the upgrades led to an overall faster, less expensive, and better way to incorporate the acquired data in the final business decisions.


Geophysics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. S73-S80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurang Mehta ◽  
Jon L. Sheiman ◽  
Roel Snieder ◽  
Rodney Calvert

Time-lapse monitoring is a powerful tool for tracking subsurface changes resulting from fluid migration. Conventional time-lapse monitoring can be done by observing differences between two seismic surveys over the surveillance period. Along with the changes in the subsurface, differences in the two seismic surveys are also caused by variations in the near-surface overburden and acquisition discrepancies. The virtual-source method monitors below the time-varying near-surface by redatuming the data down to the subsurface receiver locations. It crosscorrelates the signal that results from surface shooting recorded by subsurface receivers placed below the near-surface. For the Mars field data, redatuming the recorded response down to the permanently placed ocean-bottom cable (OBC) receivers using the virtual-source method allows one to reconstruct a survey as if virtualsources were buried at the OBC receiver locations and the medium above them were a homogeneous half-space. Separating the recorded wavefields into upgoing and downgoing (up-down) waves before crosscorrelation makes the resultant virtual-source data independent of the time-varying near-surface (seawater). For time-lapse monitoring, varying source signature for the two surveys and for each shot is also undesirable. Deconvolving the prestack crosscorrelated data (correlation gather) by the power spectrum of the source-time function results in virtual-source data independent of the source signature. Incorporating up-down wavefield separation and deconvolution of the correlation gather by the source power spectrum into the virtual-source method suppresses the causes of nonrepeatability in the seawater along with acquisition and source signature discrepancies. This processing combination strengthens the virtual-source method for time-lapse monitoring.


2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaas Koster ◽  
Pieter Gabriels ◽  
Matthias Hartung ◽  
John Verbeek ◽  
Geurt Deinum ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick Schrynemeeckers

Abstract Current offshore hydrocarbon detection methods employ vessels to collect cores along transects over structures defined by seismic imaging which are then analyzed by standard geochemical methods. Due to the cost of core collection, the sample density over these structures is often insufficient to map hydrocarbon accumulation boundaries. Traditional offshore geochemical methods cannot define reservoir sweet spots (i.e. areas of enhanced porosity, pressure, or net pay thickness) or measure light oil or gas condensate in the C7 – C15 carbon range. Thus, conventional geochemical methods are limited in their ability to help optimize offshore field development production. The capability to attach ultrasensitive geochemical modules to Ocean Bottom Seismic (OBS) nodes provides a new capability to the industry which allows these modules to be deployed in very dense grid patterns that provide extensive coverage both on structure and off structure. Thus, both high resolution seismic data and high-resolution hydrocarbon data can be captured simultaneously. Field trials were performed in offshore Ghana. The trial was not intended to duplicate normal field operations, but rather provide a pilot study to assess the viability of passive hydrocarbon modules to function properly in real world conditions in deep waters at elevated pressures. Water depth for the pilot survey ranged from 1500 – 1700 meters. Positive thermogenic signatures were detected in the Gabon samples. A baseline (i.e. non-thermogenic) signature was also detected. The results indicated the positive signatures were thermogenic and could easily be differentiated from baseline or non-thermogenic signatures. The ability to deploy geochemical modules with OBS nodes for reoccurring surveys in repetitive locations provides the ability to map the movement of hydrocarbons over time as well as discern depletion affects (i.e. time lapse geochemistry). The combined technologies will also be able to: Identify compartmentalization, maximize production and profitability by mapping reservoir sweet spots (i.e. areas of higher porosity, pressure, & hydrocarbon richness), rank prospects, reduce risk by identifying poor prospectivity areas, accurately map hydrocarbon charge in pre-salt sequences, augment seismic data in highly thrusted and faulted areas.


2021 ◽  
pp. 104521
Author(s):  
Filipe Borges ◽  
Mônica Muzzette ◽  
Luiz Eduardo Queiroz ◽  
Bruno Pereira-Dias ◽  
Roberto Dias ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Deiana ◽  
Giorgio Cassiani ◽  
Andreas Kemna ◽  
Alberto Villa ◽  
Vittorio Bruno ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document