Strengthening the virtual-source method for time-lapse monitoring

Geophysics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. S73-S80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurang Mehta ◽  
Jon L. Sheiman ◽  
Roel Snieder ◽  
Rodney Calvert

Time-lapse monitoring is a powerful tool for tracking subsurface changes resulting from fluid migration. Conventional time-lapse monitoring can be done by observing differences between two seismic surveys over the surveillance period. Along with the changes in the subsurface, differences in the two seismic surveys are also caused by variations in the near-surface overburden and acquisition discrepancies. The virtual-source method monitors below the time-varying near-surface by redatuming the data down to the subsurface receiver locations. It crosscorrelates the signal that results from surface shooting recorded by subsurface receivers placed below the near-surface. For the Mars field data, redatuming the recorded response down to the permanently placed ocean-bottom cable (OBC) receivers using the virtual-source method allows one to reconstruct a survey as if virtualsources were buried at the OBC receiver locations and the medium above them were a homogeneous half-space. Separating the recorded wavefields into upgoing and downgoing (up-down) waves before crosscorrelation makes the resultant virtual-source data independent of the time-varying near-surface (seawater). For time-lapse monitoring, varying source signature for the two surveys and for each shot is also undesirable. Deconvolving the prestack crosscorrelated data (correlation gather) by the power spectrum of the source-time function results in virtual-source data independent of the source signature. Incorporating up-down wavefield separation and deconvolution of the correlation gather by the source power spectrum into the virtual-source method suppresses the causes of nonrepeatability in the seawater along with acquisition and source signature discrepancies. This processing combination strengthens the virtual-source method for time-lapse monitoring.

Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. V79-V86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurang Mehta ◽  
Andrey Bakulin ◽  
Jonathan Sheiman ◽  
Rodney Calvert ◽  
Roel Snieder

The virtual source method has recently been proposed to image and monitor below complex and time-varying overburden. The method requires surface shooting recorded at downhole receivers placed below the distorting or changing part of the overburden. Redatuming with the measured Green’s function allows the reconstruction of a complete downhole survey as if the sources were also buried at the receiver locations. There are still some challenges that need to be addressed in the virtual source method, such as limited acquisition aperture and energy coming from the overburden. We demonstrate that up-down wavefield separation can substantially improve the quality of virtual source data. First, it allows us to eliminate artifacts associated with the limited acquisition aperture typically used in practice. Second, it allows us to reconstruct a new optimized response in the absence of downgoing reflections and multiples from the overburden. These improvements are illustrated on a synthetic data set of a complex layered model modeled after the Fahud field in Oman, and on ocean-bottom seismic data acquired in the Mars field in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurang Mehta ◽  
Jonathan Sheiman ◽  
Roel Snieder ◽  
Rodney Calvert

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 661-667
Author(s):  
Understanding Aikulola ◽  
Oke Okpobia ◽  
Arinze Okonkwo ◽  
Idris Yamusa ◽  
Emmanuel Saragoussi ◽  
...  

Time-lapse seismic data from Bonga Field, located in deepwater Nigeria, have delivered excellent results previously from dedicated streamer seismic surveys (2000, 2008, and 2012) that image changes in amplitude due to water replacing oil. One challenge with the streamer data is the presence of a floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) unit. It is difficult to accurately repeat streamer acquisition geometry in economically important updip regions of reservoirs that lie beneath the FPSO. To ensure an accurate repeat of this area, we acquired an ocean-bottom node (OBN) survey in 2010 and carried out the first time-lapse OBN repeat of the survey in 2018. Time-lapse processing of the OBN data produced excellent results. We obtained an OBN-on-OBN normalized root mean square (NRMS) difference repeatability of 6%. This was an improvement over the 12% NRMS for streamer-on-streamer repeats. The OBN data quality was unaffected by the FPSO, enabling us to properly image the changes occurring in this area. The 4D OBN interpretation was used to identify bypassed oil opportunities. The data also were used to derisk well placement, optimize water injection, and update the dynamic reservoir models. The new models are essential to enhance predictability and field performance. We also analyzed an area northwest of the field where we extended the 2018 OBN acquisition and compared it to streamer data to optimize a new injection well location.


Geophysics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. Q15-Q26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Alexandrov ◽  
Andrey Bakulin ◽  
Roy Burnstad ◽  
Boris Kashtan

Time-lapse surface seismic monitoring typically suffers from different sources of nonrepeatability related to acquisition imperfections as well as due to complexity of the subsurface. Placing sources and receivers below the surface can improve seismic data repeatability. However, it is not always possible to bury a large number of sources, and therefore the next best option is monitoring with surface sources and buried sensors. We have discovered that redatuming of surface sources to the shallow buried receivers produced a reliable image of target reflectors despite the fact that receivers were placed in the near-field zone of the source. We redatumed data with the virtual source method using crosscorrelation of the measured wavefields. We found that redatuming also reduced nonrepeatability of seismic data associated with changes in acquisition geometry, variable source coupling, and daily/seasonal variations in the near surface. We developed these results with a synthetic case study using a realistic 1D elastic model with a free surface and acquisition geometry from an actual field experiment conducted in Saudi Arabia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif M. Hanafy ◽  
Hussein Hoteit ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Gerard T. Schuster

AbstractResults are presented for real-time seismic imaging of subsurface fluid flow by parsimonious refraction and surface-wave interferometry. Each subsurface velocity image inverted from time-lapse seismic data only requires several minutes of recording time, which is less than the time-scale of the fluid-induced changes in the rock properties. In this sense this is real-time imaging. The images are P-velocity tomograms inverted from the first-arrival times and the S-velocity tomograms inverted from dispersion curves. Compared to conventional seismic imaging, parsimonious interferometry reduces the recording time and increases the temporal resolution of time-lapse seismic images by more than an order-of-magnitude. In our seismic experiment, we recorded 90 sparse data sets over 4.5 h while injecting 12-tons of water into a sand dune. Results show that the percolation of water is mostly along layered boundaries down to a depth of a few meters, which is consistent with our 3D computational fluid flow simulations and laboratory experiments. The significance of parsimonious interferometry is that it provides more than an order-of-magnitude increase of temporal resolution in time-lapse seismic imaging. We believe that real-time seismic imaging will have important applications for non-destructive characterization in environmental, biomedical, and subsurface imaging.


2021 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 103363
Author(s):  
Ben Roche ◽  
Jonathan M. Bull ◽  
Hector Marin-Moreno ◽  
Timothy G. Leighton ◽  
Ismael H. Falcon-Suarez ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaas Koster ◽  
Pieter Gabriels ◽  
Matthias Hartung ◽  
John Verbeek ◽  
Geurt Deinum ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document