Pore-pressure prediction and wellbore stability in the deep Mexican Gulf of Mexico

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 702-706
Author(s):  
Jorge Mendoza-Amuchástegui ◽  
Gabriel Vázquez-Jiménez ◽  
Manuel Espinosa-Ortega ◽  
Celestino Valle-Molina ◽  
Esteban Alvarado-Hernández ◽  
...  
AAPG Bulletin ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (04) ◽  
pp. 691-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Mosca ◽  
Thomas Hantschel ◽  
Obren Djordjevic ◽  
Jim McCarthy ◽  
Ana Krueger ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mizuar Omar ◽  
M Faiz Rasli ◽  
M Razali Paimin ◽  
Herry Maulana ◽  
Amitava Ghosh ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. SB45-SB55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Enrique Ziegler ◽  
John F. Jones

In this case study, the overburden, pore-pressure, and fracture gradients are calculated for several nearby analog wells and subsequently used to generate a predrill pore-pressure prediction for the deepwater subsalt Gulf of Mexico well, Flying Dutchman, located in Green Canyon 511 no. 1 (OCS-G 22971). Two key analog wells penetrated the lower Miocene and have sufficient data to generate pore-pressure profiles. Subsequently, the predrill pore-pressure prediction is found to be in good agreement with the pore pressure estimated from well logs while drilling. During the drilling phase of the Flying Dutchman well, two zones of significant fluid loss and wellbore breathing were encountered and are evaluated as a means of determining the formation types where they are most likely to occur, as well as their related minimum horizontal stress and fracture gradient.


Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1286-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Sayers ◽  
G. M. Johnson ◽  
G. Denyer

1A predrill estimate of pore pressure can be obtained from seismic velocities using a velocity‐to–pore‐pressure transform, but the seismic velocities need to be derived using methods having sufficient resolution for well planning purposes. For a deepwater Gulf of Mexico example, significant differences are found between the velocity field obtained using reflection tomography and that obtained using a conventional method based on the Dix equation. These lead to significant differences in the predicted pore pressure. Parameters in the velocity‐to–pore‐pressure transform are estimated using seismic interval velocities and pressure data from nearby calibration wells. The uncertainty in the pore pressure prediction is analyzed by examining the spread in the predicted pore pressure obtained using parameter combinations which sample the region of parameter space consistent with the available well data. If calibration wells are not available, the ideas proposed in this paper can be used with measurements made while drilling to predict pore pressure ahead of the bit based on seismic velocities.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herry Maulana ◽  
Amitava Ghosh ◽  
M. Razali Paimin ◽  
M Abiabhar Abitalhah

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niranjan Banik* ◽  
Ivan Priezzhev ◽  
Adam Koesoemadinata ◽  
Charles Inyang ◽  
Vinod Agarwal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document