Analysis of image gathers in factorized VTI media

Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 2016-2025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debashish Sarkar ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Velocity ◽  
Velocity Gradient ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Velocity Variation ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Lateral Heterogeneity ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Isotropic Media ◽  
Vti Media

Because events in image gathers generated after prestack depth migration are sensitive to the velocity field, they are often used in migration velocity analysis for isotropic media. Here, we present an analytic and numerical study of P‐wave image gathers in transversely isotropic media with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI) and establish the conditions for flattening such events and positioning them at the true reflector depth. Application of the weak‐anisotropy approximation leads to concise expressions for reflections in image gathers from homogeneous and factorized v(z) media in terms of the VTI parameters and the vertical velocity gradient kz. Flattening events in image gathers for any reflector dip requires accurate values of the zero‐dip NMO velocity at the surface [Vnmo (z = 0)], the gradient kz, and the anellipticity coefficient η. For a fixed error in Vnmo and kz, the magnitude of residual moveout of events in image gathers decreases with dip, while the moveout caused by an error in η initially increases for moderate dips but then decreases as dips approach 90°. Flat events in image gathers in VTI media, however, do not guarantee the correct depth scale of the model because reflector depth depends on the vertical migration velocity. For factorized v(x, z) media with a linear velocity variation in both the x‐ and z‐directions, the moveout on image gathers is controlled by Vnmo (x = z = 0), kz, η, and a combination of the horizontal velocity gradient kx and the Thomsen parameter δ (specifically, kx[Formula: see text]). If too large a value of any of these four quantities is used in migration, reflections in the image gathers curve downward (i.e., they are undercorrected; the inferred depth increases with offset), while a negative error results in overcorrection. Lateral heterogeneity tends to increase the sensitivity of moveout of events in image gathers to the parameter η, and errors in η may lead to measurable residual moveout of horizontal events in v(x, z) media even for offset‐to‐depth ratios close to unity. These results provide a basis for extending to VTI media conventional velocity analysis methods operating with image gathers. Although P‐wave traveltimes alone cannot be used to separate anisotropy from lateral heterogeneity (i.e., kx is coupled to δ), moveout of events in image gathers does constrain the vertical gradient kz. Hence, it may be possible to build VTI velocity models in depth by supplementing reflection data with minimal a priori information, such as the vertical velocity at the top of the factorized VTI layer.

Migration velocity analysis in factorized VTI media

Geophysics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 708-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debashish Sarkar ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Velocity ◽  
Velocity Gradient ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Wave Migration ◽  
Vti Media

One of the main challenges in anisotropic velocity analysis and imaging is simultaneous estimation of velocity gradients and anisotropic parameters from reflection data. Approximating the subsurface by a factorized VTI (transversely isotropic with a vertical symmetry axis) medium provides a convenient way of building vertically and laterally heterogeneous anisotropic models for prestack depthmigration. The algorithm for P‐wave migration velocity analysis (MVA) introduced here is designed for models composed of factorized VTI layers or blocks with constant vertical and lateral gradients in the vertical velocity VP0. The anisotropic MVA method is implemented as an iterative two‐step procedure that includes prestack depth migration (imaging step) followed by an update of the medium parameters (velocity‐analysis step). The residual moveout of the migrated events, which is minimized during the parameter updates, is described by a nonhyperbolic equation whose coefficients are determined by 2D semblance scanning. For piecewise‐factorized VTI media without significant dips in the overburden, the residual moveout of P‐wave events in image gathers is governed by four effective quantities in each block: (1) the normal‐moveout velocity Vnmo at a certain point within the block, (2) the vertical velocity gradient kz, (3) the combination kx[Formula: see text] of the lateral velocity gradient kx and the anisotropic parameter δ, and (4) the anellipticity parameter η. We show that all four parameters can be estimated from the residual moveout for at least two reflectors within a block sufficiently separated in depth. Inversion for the parameter η also requires using either long‐spread data (with the maximum offset‐to‐depth ratio no less than two) from horizontal interfaces or reflections from dipping interfaces. To find the depth scale of the section and build a model for prestack depth migration using the MVA results, the vertical velocity VP0 needs to be specified for at least a single point in each block. When no borehole information about VP0 is available, a well‐focused image can often be obtained by assuming that the vertical‐velocity field is continuous across layer boundaries. A synthetic test for a three‐layer model with a syncline structure confirms the accuracy of our MVA algorithm in estimating the interval parameters Vnmo, kz, kx, and η and illustrates the influence of errors in the vertical velocity on the image quality.

Migration velocity analysis for TI media in the presence of quadratic lateral velocity variation

Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. U87-U96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoru Takanashi ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Migration Velocity ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Velocity Variation ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Lateral Heterogeneity ◽  
Lateral Velocity ◽  
Symmetry Direction ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Ti Media

One of the most serious problems in anisotropic velocity analysis is the trade-off between anisotropy and lateral heterogeneity, especially if velocity varies on a scale smaller than the maximum offset. We have developed a P-wave MVA (migration velocity analysis) algorithm for transversely isotropic (TI) models that include layers with small-scale lateral heterogeneity. Each layer is described by constant Thomsen parameters [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] and the symmetry-direction velocity [Formula: see text] that varies as a quadratic function of the distance along the layer boundaries. For tilted TI media (TTI), the symmetry axis is taken orthogonal to the reflectors. We analyzed the influence of lateral heterogeneity on image gathers obtained after prestack depth migration and found that quadratic lateral velocity variation in the overburden can significantly distort the moveout of the target reflection. Consequently, medium parameters beneath the heterogeneous layer(s) are estimated with substantial error, even when borehole information (e.g., check shots or sonic logs) is available. Because residual moveout in the image gathers is highly sensitive to lateral heterogeneity in the overburden, our algorithm simultaneously inverts for the interval parameters of all layers. Synthetic tests for models with a gently dipping overburden demonstrate that if the vertical profile of the symmetry-direction velocity [Formula: see text] is known at one location, the algorithm can reconstruct the other relevant parameters of TI models. The proposed approach helps increase the robustness of anisotropic velocity model-building and enhance image quality in the presence of small-scale lateral heterogeneity in the overburden.

Image gathers of SV-waves in homogeneous and factorized VTI media

Geophysics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. D55-D64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramzy M. Al-Zayer ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Vertical Velocity ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Wave Data ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Wave Migration ◽  
Vti Media

Reflection moveout of SV-waves in transversely isotropic media with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI media) can provide valuable information about the model parameters and help to overcome the ambiguities in the inversion of P-wave data. Here, to develop a foundation for shear-wave migration velocity analysis, we study SV-wave image gathers obtained after prestack depth migration. The key issue, addressed using both approximate analytic results and Kirchhoff migration of synthetic data, is whether long-spread SV data can constrain the shear-wave vertical velocity [Formula: see text] and the depth scale of VTI models. For homogeneous media, the residual moveout of horizontal SV events on image gathers is close to hyperbolic and depends just on the NMO velocity [Formula: see text] out to offset-to-depth ratios of about 1.7. Because [Formula: see text] differs from [Formula: see text], flattening moderate-spread gathers of SV-waves does not ensure the correct depth of the migrated events. The residual moveout rapidly becomes nonhyperbolic as the offset-to-depth ratio approaches two, with the migrated depths at long offsets strongly influenced by the SV-wave anisotropy parameter σ. Although the combination of [Formula: see text] and σ is sufficient to constrain the vertical velocity [Formula: see text] and reflector depth, the tradeoff between σ and the Thomsen parameter ε on long-spread gathers causes errors in time-to-depth conversion. The residual moveout of dipping SV events is also controlled by the parameters [Formula: see text], σ, and ε, but in the presence of dip, the contributions of both σ and ε are significant even at small offsets. For factorized v(z) VTI media with a constant SV-wave vertical-velocity gradient [Formula: see text], flattening of horizontal events for a range of depths requires the correct NMO velocity at the surface, the gradient [Formula: see text], and, for long offsets, the parameters σ and ε. On the whole, the nonnegligible uncertainty in the estimation of reflector depth from SV-wave moveout highlights the need to combine P- and SV-wave data in migration velocity analysis for VTI media.

Depth‐domain velocity analysis in VTI media using surface P-wave data: Is it feasible?

Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 897-903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Le Stunff ◽  
Vladimir Grechka ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Velocity ◽  
Heterogeneous Media ◽  
Wave Reflection ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Vti Media

The main difficulties in anisotropic velocity analysis and inversion using surface seismic data are associated with the multiparameter nature of the problem and inherent trade‐offs between the model parameters. For the most common anisotropic model, transverse isotropy with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI media), P-wave kinematic signatures are controlled by the vertical velocity V0 and the anisotropic parameters ε and δ. However, only two combinations of these parameters—NMO velocity from a horizontal reflector Vnmo(0) and the anellipticity coefficient η—can be determined from P-wave reflection traveltimes if the medium above the reflector is laterally homogeneous. While Vnmo(0) and η are sufficient for time‐domain imaging in VTI media, they cannot be used to resolve the vertical velocity and build velocity models needed for depth migration. Here, we demonstrate that P-wave reflection data can be inverted for all three relevant VTI parameters (V0, ε and δ) if the model contains nonhorizontal intermediate interfaces. Using anisotropic reflection tomography, we carry out parameter estimation for a two‐layer medium with a curved intermediate interface and reconstruct the correct anisotropic depth model. To explain the success of this inversion procedure, we present an analytic study of reflection traveltimes for this model and show that the information about the vertical velocity and reflector depth was contained in the reflected rays which crossed the dipping intermediate interface. The results of this work are especially encouraging because the need for depth imaging (such as prestack depth migration) arises mostly in laterally heterogeneous media. Still, we restricted this study to a relatively simple model and constrained the inversion by assuming that one of the layers is isotropic. In general, although lateral heterogeneity does create a dependence of P-wave reflection traveltimes on the vertical velocity, there is no guarantee that for more complicated models all anisotropic parameters can be resolved in a unique fashion.

scholarly journals Joint migration velocity analysis of PP- and PS-waves for VTI media

Geophysics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. WC123-WC135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Cai ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Grid Point ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
The North ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Vti Media

Combining PP-waves with mode-converted PS reflections in migration velocity analysis (MVA) can help build more accurate VTI (transversely isotropic with a vertical symmetry axis) velocity models. To avoid problems caused by the moveout asymmetry of PS-waves and take advantage of efficient MVA algorithms designed for pure modes, here we generate pure SS-reflections from PP and PS data using the [Formula: see text] method. Then the residual moveout in both PP and SS common-image gathers is minimized during iterative velocity updates. The model is divided into square cells, and the VTI parameters [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] are defined at each grid point. The objective function also includes the differences between the migrated depths of the same reflectors on the PP and SS sections. Synthetic examples confirm that 2D MVA of PP- and PS-waves may be able to resolve all four relevant parameters of VTI media if reflectors with at least two distinct dips are available. The algorithm is also successfully applied to a 2D line from 3D ocean-bottom seismic data acquired at Volve field in the North Sea. After the anisotropic velocity model has been estimated, accurate depth images can be obtained by migrating the recorded PP and PS data.

Common-reflection-point migration velocity analysis of 2D P-wave data from TTI media

Geophysics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. C65-C79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto V. Oropeza ◽  
George A. McMechan
Keyword(s):  
Symmetry Axis ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Reflection Point ◽  
Axis Orientation ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Free Data

We have developed a common-reflection-point (CRP)-based kinematic migration velocity analysis for 2D P-wave reflection data to estimate the four transversely isotropic (TI) parameters [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text], and the tilt angle [Formula: see text] of the symmetry axis in a TI medium. In each iteration, the tomographic parameter was updated alternately with prestack anisotropic ray-based migration. Iterations initially used layer stripping to reduce the number of degrees of freedom; after convergence was reached, a couple of more iterations over all parameters and all CRPs ensured global interlayer coupling and parameter interaction. The TI symmetry axis orientation was constrained to be locally perpendicular to the reflectors. The [Formula: see text] dominated the inversion, and so it was weighted less than [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the parameter updates. Estimates of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were influenced if the error in [Formula: see text] was [Formula: see text]; estimates of [Formula: see text] were also influenced if the error in [Formula: see text] was [Formula: see text]. Examples included data for a simple model with a homogeneous TI layer whose dips allowed recovery of all anisotropy parameters from noise-free data, and a more realistic model (the BP tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) model) for which only [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] were recoverable. The adequacy of the traveltimes predicted by the inverted anisotropic models was tested by comparing migrated images and common image gathers, with those produced using the known velocity models.

A constrained parametric inversion for velocity analysis based on CFP technology

Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1210-1222 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Nurul Kabir ◽  
D. J. Verschuur
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Velocity ◽  
Velocity Gradient ◽  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Velocity Variation ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Parametric Inversion ◽  
Layer Velocity ◽  
Vertical Velocity Gradient

A method of velocity analysis based on the common focusing point (CFP) method is presented. The two important aspects of the method are the use of the CFP domain and the use of a new parameterization—a vertical velocity gradient to describe the lateral velocity variation within a layer. The layer velocity is defined with only two parameters: an average velocity [Formula: see text]and a vertical velocity gradient (β). Layer velocity parameterization using [Formula: see text] and β assumes that the lithology of the layer is constant and that the overburden and fluid pressure increase linearly with depth. This type of parameterization is suitable for areas with gross changes in lithology (clastic‐carbonate‐salt) and for rock in hydrostatic equilibrium. A layer‐based model is required for these areas. The salt dome data example presented belongs to this type of area, so the layer‐based model with the defined parameterization produced a very good subsurface velocity model. The method is based on the principle of equal traveltime between the focusing operator and the corresponding focus point response. The velocity estimation problem is formulated as a constrained parametric inversion process. The method of perturbation is applied where linear assumptions are made; the velocity inversion, however, is a nonlinear problem, and the model parameter updates are computed iteratively using Newton’s method. The velocity model is built by layers in a top‐down approach, which makes the problem quasi‐linear.

Anisotropic velocity analysis for lithology discrimination

Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1564-1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Byun ◽  
D. Corrigan ◽  
J. E. Gaiser
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Velocity ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Wave Model ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Anisotropy ◽  
Transversely Isotropic Media ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Isotropic Media ◽  
Vsp Data

A new velocity analysis technique is presented for analyzing moveout of signals on multichannel surface seismic or VSP data. An approximate, skewed hyperbolic moveout formula is derived for horizontally layered, transversely isotropic media. This formula involves three measurement parameters: the average vertical velocity and horizontal and skew moveout velocities. By extending Dix‐type hyperbolic moveout analysis, we obtain improved coherence over large source‐geophone offsets for more accurate moveout correction. Compared with the stacking velocity obtained by simple hyperbolic analysis methods, the three velocity parameters estimated by this technique contain more physically meaningful geologic information regarding the anisotropy and/or velocity heterogeneity of the subsurface. Synthetic P‐wave model experiments demonstrate that the skewed hyperbolic moveout formula yields an excellent fit to time‐distance curves over a wide range of ray angles. Consequently, the measurement parameters are shown to reflect adequately the characteristics of velocity dependence on ray angle, i.e., velocity anisotropy. The technique is then applied to two field offset VSP data sets to measure and analyze the velocity parameters. The results show that the apparent anisotropy, defined as the ratio between the horizontal moveout velocity and average vertical velocity, correlates reasonably well with lithology. Highly anisotropic shale and chalk exhibit higher horizontal‐to‐vertical velocity ratios and sandstones show lower ratios.

Migration velocity analysis from locally coherent events in 2‐D laterally heterogeneous media, Part I: Theoretical aspects

Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1202-1212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hervé Chauris ◽  
Mark S. Noble ◽  
Gilles Lambaré ◽  
Pascal Podvin
Keyword(s):  
Cost Function ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Seismic Reflection Data ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Paraxial Ray ◽  
The Cost

We present a new method based on migration velocity analysis (MVA) to estimate 2‐D velocity models from seismic reflection data with no assumption on reflector geometry or the background velocity field. Classical approaches using picking on common image gathers (CIGs) must consider continuous events over the whole panel. This interpretive step may be difficult—particularly for applications on real data sets. We propose to overcome the limiting factor by considering locally coherent events. A locally coherent event can be defined whenever the imaged reflectivity locally shows lateral coherency at some location in the image cube. In the prestack depth‐migrated volume obtained for an a priori velocity model, locally coherent events are picked automatically, without interpretation, and are characterized by their positions and slopes (tangent to the event). Even a single locally coherent event has information on the unknown velocity model, carried by the value of the slope measured in the CIG. The velocity is estimated by minimizing these slopes. We first introduce the cost function and explain its physical meaning. The theoretical developments lead to two equivalent expressions of the cost function: one formulated in the depth‐migrated domain on locally coherent events in CIGs and the other in the time domain. We thus establish direct links between different methods devoted to velocity estimation: migration velocity analysis using locally coherent events and slope tomography. We finally explain how to compute the gradient of the cost function using paraxial ray tracing to update the velocity model. Our method provides smooth, inverted velocity models consistent with Kirchhoff‐type migration schemes and requires neither the introduction of interfaces nor the interpretation of continuous events. As for most automatic velocity analysis methods, careful preprocessing must be applied to remove coherent noise such as multiples.

Migration velocity analysis based on focusing diffractions generated using the CRS wavefront attributes: Application to real land data

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-50
Author(s):  
German Garabito ◽  
José Silas dos Santos Silva ◽  
Williams Lima
Keyword(s):  
Time Domain ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Normal Incidence ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
The Time Domain

In land seismic data processing, the prestack time migration (PSTM) image remains the standard imaging output, but a reliable migrated image of the subsurface depends on the accuracy of the migration velocity model. We have adopted two new algorithms for time-domain migration velocity analysis based on wavefield attributes of the common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack method. These attributes, extracted from multicoverage data, were successfully applied to build the velocity model in the depth domain through tomographic inversion of the normal-incidence-point (NIP) wave. However, there is no practical and reliable method for determining an accurate and geologically consistent time-migration velocity model from these CRS attributes. We introduce an interactive method to determine the migration velocity model in the time domain based on the application of NIP wave attributes and the CRS stacking operator for diffractions, to generate synthetic diffractions on the reflection events of the zero-offset (ZO) CRS stacked section. In the ZO data with diffractions, the poststack time migration (post-STM) is applied with a set of constant velocities, and the migration velocities are then selected through a focusing analysis of the simulated diffractions. We also introduce an algorithm to automatically calculate the migration velocity model from the CRS attributes picked for the main reflection events in the ZO data. We determine the precision of our diffraction focusing velocity analysis and the automatic velocity calculation algorithms using two synthetic models. We also applied them to real 2D land data with low quality and low fold to estimate the time-domain migration velocity model. The velocity models obtained through our methods were validated by applying them in the Kirchhoff PSTM of real data, in which the velocity model from the diffraction focusing analysis provided significant improvements in the quality of the migrated image compared to the legacy image and to the migrated image obtained using the automatically calculated velocity model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document