Vertical open fractures and shear‐wave velocities derived from VSPs, full waveform acoustic logs, and televiewer data

Geophysics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 818-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Lefeuvre ◽  
Roger Turpening ◽  
Carol Caravana ◽  
Andrea Born ◽  
Laurence Nicoletis

Fracture or stress‐related shear‐wave birefringence (or azimuthal anisotropy) from vertical seismic profiles (VSPs) is commonly observed today, but no attempt is made to fit the observations with observed in‐situ fractures and velocities. With data from a hard rock (limestones, dolomites, and anhydrites) region of Michigan, fast and slow shear‐wave velocities have been derived from a nine‐component zero offset VSP and compared to shear‐wave velocities from two full waveform acoustic logs. To represent the shear‐wave birefringence that affects the shear wave’s vertical propagation, a propagator matrix technique is used allowing a local measurement independent of the overburden layers. The picked times obtained by using a correlation technique have been corrected in the birefringent regions before we compute the fast and slow velocities. Although there are some differences between the three velocity sets, there is a good fit between the velocities from the shear‐wave VSP and those from the two logs. We suspect the formations showing birefringence to be vertically fractured. To support this, we examine the behavior of the Stoneley wave on the full waveform acoustic logs in the formations. In addition, we analyze the borehole televiewer data from a nearby well. There is a good fit between the fractures seen from the VSP data and those seen from the borehole.

Geophysics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. B. Lynn ◽  
L. A. Thomsen

The presence of vertically oriented fractures and/or unequal horizontal stresses has created an azimuthally anisotropic earth, in which shear‐wave (SH) data collected along the principal axes of the anisotropy display time and reflection amplitude anomalies. Amoco shot two crossing shear‐wave (SH) lines that were approximately parallel to the orthogonal principal axes of the azimuthal anisotropy. At the tie point, these crossing SH lines display a time‐variant mis‐tie. The tie point also displays reflection‐coefficient anomalies, attributable to azimuthally dependent shear‐wave velocities. Field mapping documented a set of fractures striking N69E which are approximately parallel to the line that exhibited greater traveltimes. Time‐variant mis‐ties and reflection coefficient anomalies are two of the seismic responses theoretically expected of an azimuthally anisotropic earth, i.e., one in which the shear‐wave velocity depends upon the polarization azimuth of the shear wave.


Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. S219-S228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianjian Huo ◽  
Binzhong Zhou ◽  
Qing Zhao ◽  
Iain M. Mason ◽  
Ying Rao

Migration is used to collapse “diffractions,” i.e., to focus hyperbolic events that appear in the space-time of a seismic profile — into spots of finite area in the image space. These usually represent scattering objects. However, there are situations in which some of the energy can be focused by migration, and muted without significantly damaging the remaining echoes. Demigration or forward modeling then restores the remaining data, and the removed signals can be rebuilt by subtracting these restored data from the original records. This process can be classified as migration-based filtering. It is demonstrated by synthetic and field data that this filter can be used for suppressing unwanted coherent signals or separating/extracting wavefields of interest: (1) the suppression of ground roll in seismic shot gathers, (2) the suppression of axially guided arrivals in borehole radar profiles, (3) suppressing the direct arrivals to enhance Stoneley-wave reflections in full-waveform sonic logging data, and (4) separating up- and downgoing waves in vertical seismic profiles.


Measurement ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Adamo ◽  
F. Attivissimo ◽  
L. Fabbiano ◽  
N. Giaquinto ◽  
M. Spadavecchia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document