Formation resistivity variation due to steam flooding: A log study

Geophysics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 488-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Ranganayaki ◽  
S. E. Akturk ◽  
S. M. Fryer
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Steam Flooding ◽  
Resistivity Logs ◽  
Resistivity Variation ◽  
Steam Flood ◽  
Formation Resistivity ◽  
Production Pattern

An investigation of the pre‐ and poststeam resistivity logs, in a production pattern in a heavy‐oil field in Southern California, shows that the formation resistivity in steamed formations decreases by a factor of two to three. Shales as well as sands are affected by the steam flood. The observed drop in the resistivity of the reservoir correlates well with the increase in temperature. The study shows the potential of using resistivity variations to map and monitor thermal enhanced oil recovery process.

Remote monitoring of the steam‐flood enhanced oil recovery process

Geophysics ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 1457-1465 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. F. Laine
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Heavy Oil ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Oil Sands ◽  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Color Image ◽  
Vertical Plane ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Steam Flood ◽  
Borehole Seismic

Cross‐borehole seismic velocity and high‐frequency electromagnetic (EM) attenuation data were obtained to construct tomographic images of heavy oil sands in a steam‐flood environment. First‐arrival seismic data were used to construct a tomographic color image of a 10 m by 8 m vertical plane between the two boreholes. Two high‐frequency (17 and 15 MHz) EM transmission tomographs were constructed of a 20 m by 8 m vertical plane. The velocity tomograph clearly shows a shale layer with oil sands above it and below it. The EM tomographs show a more complex geology of oil sands with shale inclusions. The deepest EM tomograph shows the upper part of an active steam zone and suggests steam chanelling just below the shale layer. These results show the detailed structure of the entire plane between boreholes and may provide a better means to understand the process for in situ heavy oil recovery in a steam‐flood environment.

scholarly journals The Importance of Microemulsion for the Surfactant Injection Process in Enhanced Oil Recovery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rini Setiati ◽  
Muhammad Taufiq Fathaddin ◽  
Aqlyna Fatahanissa
Keyword(s):  
Interfacial Tension ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Injection System ◽  
Type I ◽  
Middle Phase ◽  
Interface Tension ◽  
Lower Phase ◽  
Injection Process

Microemulsion is the main parameter that determines the performance of a surfactant injection system. According to Myers, there are four main mechanisms in the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) surfactant injection process, namely interface tension between oil and surfactant, emulsification, decreased interfacial tension and wettability. In the EOR process, the three-phase regions can be classified as type I, upper-phase emulsion, type II, lower-phase emulsion and type III, middle-phase microemulsion. In the middle-phase emulsion, some of the surfactant grains blend with part of the oil phase so that the interfacial tension in the area is reduced. The decrease in interface tension results in the oil being more mobile to produce. Thus, microemulsion is an important parameter in the enhanced oil recovery process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document