scholarly journals Development of a new monoclonal antibody-based point-of-care testing assay for the quantification of procalcitonin in whole blood for a rapid sepsis diagnostic

Critical Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (Suppl 4) ◽  
pp. P13
Author(s):  
Martin Rieger ◽  
Daniela Rascher ◽  
Anton Hartmann
1999 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 1676-1678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald E Brooks ◽  
Dana V Devine ◽  
Paul C Harris ◽  
Joanne E Harris ◽  
Mark E Miller ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S325-S325
Author(s):  
D Maniero ◽  
G Lorenzon ◽  
I Marsilio ◽  
A Rigo ◽  
R Cardin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Infliximab (IFX) is a monoclonal antibody that targets cytokine tumor necrosis factor; it is used for the treatment of patients with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). IFX induces and maintains remission and mucosal healing in patients with IBD. Measurement of trough levels (TL) of IFX is important to assess if the drug is within its therapeutic concentrationand to explain lack/loss of response. Standard laboratory tests to assess IFX trough levels (enzyme linked immunosorbent assays, ELISA) present some downsides, related to the long turnaround (about 3 hours), and the need of specialized equipment and laboratory personnel. For this reason, point-of care testing (POCT) was developed to provide results within a few minutes from blood collection, leading to a decision-making approach. Aim To determine the degree of analytical correlation between a recently developed POCT (ProciseDx) IFX assay which analyze capillary whole blood and the comparative ELISA from serum. Methods From October 2020 to January 2021, patients (aged≥18 years) taking IFX were recruited at Gastroenterology Unit, Padua University Hospital. In each patient, IFX levels from capillary whole blood collected by finger stick were performed using the ProciseDx IFX assay with reportable range between 1.7-77.2 µg/mL; at the same time, a serum sample from venous blood was collected to carry out Grifols’ Promonitor ELISA test (range 0.035–14.4 µg/mL). A Deming regression test was used to identify the correlation between the two methods. Results Eighty-seven patients were enrolled (63% males; mean age of 44±16), with 52% of them having CD, 45% UC and 3% an undetermined-Inflammatory Bowel Disease. The assessment with ProciseDx POCT was feasible in each patient and only in three cases blood collection from finger prick was repeated. Moreover, from blood collection to results we needed about 3±0.5 minutes, while serum ELISA analysis required the collection of at least 40 samples (around three weeks at our centre) and 3 hours to be performed. 39 patients (59% males; mean age of 44±16) had TL as assessed by ProciseDx IFX assay lower than 1.7 or greater than 14.4 µg/mL, in accordance with ELISA assessment. Among the remaining 48 patients (67% males with mean age of 45±17), The correlation between the two tests was high (the total results showed an R squared of 0.691 (95% CI 0.717-0.902). Conclusion The ProciseDx POCT has good accuracy but was more rapid and easy to be performed in providing the results of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in outpatients taking IFX. This could lead to a more effective optimization of the biological drug, thus avoiding treatment failure.


The Analyst ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (18) ◽  
pp. 6138-6147
Author(s):  
Xianbo Qiu ◽  
Huiqin Jiang ◽  
Xiaolei Zhang ◽  
Ke Li ◽  
Shengxiang Ge ◽  
...  

For point-of-care testing, a membrane-assisted, sedimentation-facilitated plasma separator with a multifunctional deformable chamber is developed to perform plasma separation from undiluted whole blood in a short time.


2020 ◽  
Vol 308 ◽  
pp. 127750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huan Xu ◽  
Anyue Xia ◽  
Jie Luo ◽  
Mingxuan Gao ◽  
Renkuan Liao ◽  
...  

Pathology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 498-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raellene Dare-Smith ◽  
Tony Badrick ◽  
Philip Cunningham ◽  
Alison Kesson ◽  
Susan Badman

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (12) ◽  
pp. 1196-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory P. Samsa ◽  
Thomas L. Ortel ◽  
Stephanie L. Perry

SummaryAntiphospholipid antibodies can influence the results of clotting tests in a subset of patients, which can be a major obstacle in monitoring warfarin. The aim was to determine if point-of-care testing of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) is influenced by antiphospholipid antibodies. We compared 59 patients receiving warfarin for a diagnosis of antiphosphoipid antibody syndrome (APS) to 49 patients receiving warfarin for atrial fibrillation to evaluate the consistency between INR results obtained by different methods. INR results obtained by finger stick (capillary whole-blood) and venipuncture (non-citrated and citrated whole-blood) were compared with our laboratory plasma-based prothrombin time assay. Five patients (8%) with APS and both elevated anti-β2glycoprotein I levels and positive lupus anticoagulants had non-measurable ProTime® INR results and generally higher Hemochron® Signature INR results than the plasma-based method, but the corresponding chromogenic factor X results were not supratherapeutic. For the remaining patients, differences between the plasma-based INR and the point-of-care INR results ranged from 0.2±0.2 to 0.4±0.3. The differences were similar for patients with APS and atrial fibrillation for all INR comparisons with the exception of the plasma-based method compared with the ProTime, which showed a mean absolute difference of 0.4±0.3 for APS patients and of 0.2±0.2 for atrial fibrillation patients (p=0.02). In a subset ofAPS patients, the ProTime® system will not yield an INR result and the HEMochron Signature (citrate and non-citrate whole-blood) INR results will exhibit elevated INR results. For this subset of APS patients, we suggest using an alternative method to monitor warfarin.


Author(s):  
Sheila Febriana ◽  
Asvin Nurulita ◽  
Uleng Bahrun

Troponin I is a cardiac biomarker recomended by The Third Global Myocardial Infarction Task Force World Health Organisation(WHO). Troponin plays a central role as a relevant biomarker that require reliable samples, methods, device and efficiency of time.Selecting the device, methods and sample used in the assay may affect the results and turn arround time. The aim of this study is toknow troponin I result using Point of care Testing device with a flourescence immunoassay methods using whole blood and laboratorybasedanalysis device with Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA) methods using serum by evaluation. Cross sectional study was heldon 50 subjects in Wahidin Sudirohusodo hospital during the period between July-August 2015, those who suspected suffering acutecoronary syndome (ACS) and underwent troponin I test ordered by the physician and also had whole blood sample. The subjects arearound 51.96±12.80 year old and most of them are men (62%). The mean consentration of troponin I with laboratoric-based analysis is0.50±1.69 μg/L and with POCT is 0.51±1.77. The Pearson correlation test shows the correlation (r) is 0.99 with the p value is <0.001.Bland and Altman methods show the mean difference between two assays is 0.014μg/L (95% confidence interval, -0.015; 0.043) withthe limit of agreement -0.19 to 0.22. Based on this study, it can be concluded that troponin I assay using POCT device can be used tosupport ACS diagnosis precisely and rapidly. It is suggested to perform futher study with concern on the patient’s clinical condition aswell as the diagnosis, so it can evaluate the device performance to measure troponin I levels consistently with the clinical condition.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S353-S353
Author(s):  
I Marsilio ◽  
D Maniero ◽  
G Lorenzon ◽  
A Rigo ◽  
R Cardin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Adalimumab (ADL) is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody that targets the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and has been shown to effectively induce and maintain disease remission in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). However, some patients fail to respond to this treatment, experiencing primary failure (no response to induction therapy), while others initially respond but lose efficacy over time (secondary failure). Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), in clinical practice, may lead to maintain therapeutic drug concentration thereby optimizing individual dosage regimen and improving treatment response. Recently, a point of care testing (POCT) has been developed to rapidly measure trough levels in patients taking ADL. Comparative data with current gold standard are lacking. Aim To determine the degree of analytical correlation between a recently developed POCT (ProciseDx) ADL assay which analyze capillary whole blood and the comparative enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) from serum samples. Methods From December 2020 to February 2021, consecutive patients (aged ≥ 18 years) taking ADA (Humira, Amgevita, Imraldi) were recruited at Gastroenterology Unit, Padua University Hospital, during outpatient visits. In each patient, ADL levels from capillary whole blood collected by finger stick were performed using the ProciseDx ADL assay with reportable range between 1.3 µg/mL - 51.5 µg/mL; at the same time, a serum sample from venous blood was collected to carry out Grifols’ Promonitor ELISA test (range ≤ 0.024 – 12 µg/mL). A Deming regression test was used to identify the correlation between the two methods. Results Sixty patients were enrolled (67% males with mean age of 3±14), with 80% of them having CD, 17% UC and 3% an undetermined-Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD-U). The assessment with ProciseDx POCT was feasible and required a turnaround time of 3±0.2 minutes while serum ELISA analysis required the collection of at least 40 samples (around three weeks at our centre) and 3 hours to be performed. Thirty patients (63% males with mean age of 41±14) had therapeutic levels as assessed by ProciseDx ADL assay lower than 1.3 or greater than 12 µg/mL, in accordance with ELISA assessment. Among the remaining 30 patients (70% males with mean age of 43±15), the correlation between the two tests was high (r of 0.858 (95% CI 0.720 – 0.930)). Conclusion The ProciseDx POCT has similar accuracy but was more rapid and easy to be performed in providing the results of TDM in outpatients taking ADL. This could lead to a more rapid and effective optimization of the biological drug, thus avoiding treatment failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document