scholarly journals Pro/Con debate: Are barrier precautions cost-effective in improving patient outcomes in the intensive care unit?

Critical Care ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nisha Thampi ◽  
Andrew M Morris
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Cost Effective

A policy of omitting an intensive care unit stay after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and cost-effective

2016 ◽  
Vol 204 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kellie E. Cunningham ◽  
Mazen S. Zenati ◽  
Jonathan R. Petrie ◽  
Jennifer L. Steve ◽  
Melissa E. Hogg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Stay ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Comparison Of Alternative Intensivist Staffing Schedules On Physician And Patient Outcomes In The Intensive Care Unit

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naeem A. Ali ◽  
Karen Wolf ◽  
Jeffrey Hammersley ◽  
Stephen Hoffmann ◽  
James O'Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes

scholarly journals Too Expensive to Treat? Non-Treatment Decisions at the Margins of Viability

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 461-481
Author(s):  
Tatiana Flessas ◽  
Emily Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Premature Infant ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
The State ◽  
Premature Babies

Abstract This article seeks to challenge the assumption that it is legitimate to consider the costs of premature babies’ future social and educational needs when deciding what treatment, if any, to provide in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) . It questions the elision that is made between the claim that a particular treatment is insufficiently cost-effective and the claim that a person will be a burden on the state in the future. It discusses a series of common misunderstandings about how treatment decisions are taken in the NICU and concludes by suggesting that the claim that premature babies are too expensive to treat may depend upon regarding a premature infant as if she were not yet a person, with rights and interests of her own.

scholarly journals Profile of newborns discharged from the intensive neonatal care unit submitted to the kangaroo ward

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 685
Author(s):  
Karla Camila Lima de Souza ◽  
ANNY Caroline Ferreira de Carvalho ◽  
Natália Maria Chagas Evangelista ◽  
Magnely Moura do Nascimento ◽  
Andrea Stopiglia Guedes Braide ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Kangaroo Care ◽  
Microsoft Excel ◽  
Neonatal Care Unit

Background: Describe the profile of newborns discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) sent to a kangaroo ward and their neonatal variables.Methods: Retrospective and documentary study with a quantitative approach, performed at the General Hospital César Cals, whose sample consisted of 30 charts. The following variables were analyzed: weight, gestational age, Apgar score, gender, race, adequacy of the pregnancy and assistance provided in the NICU and kangaroo ward. The variables were analyzed using Microsoft Excel® 2010 program to obtain percentages.Results: There was a prevalence of extremely premature infants with high underweight and small size for the gestational age, male gender and browns, with Apgar score at 1st and 5th minutes more than 7, born by cesarean section, who used mechanical ventilation and surfactant, with prevalence of respiratory distress syndrome, with admission weight in Kangaroo ward less than 1.250g, making use of exclusive breast milk, who were attended by physiotherapy and with weight less than 1.600g at discharge, of the variables studied.Conclusions: Kangaroo care is an excellent cost-effective model for the newborn coming from the neonatal intensive care unit.

Organization and Structure of the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit

2015 ◽  
pp. 86-104
Author(s):  
Michael H. Wall
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Low Intensity

The purpose of this chapter is to emphasize and describe the team nature of critical care medicine in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit. The chapter will review the importance of various team members and discuss various staffing models (open vs closed, high intensity vs low intensity, etc.) on patient outcomes and cost. The chapter will also examine the roles of nurse practitioners and physician assistants (NP/PAs) in critical care, and will briefly review the growing role of the tele-ICU. Most studies support the concept that a multi-disciplinary ICU team, led by an intensivist, improves patient outcomes and decreases overall cost of care. The role of the tele-ICU and 24 hour in-house intensivist staffing in improving outcomes is controversial, and more research is needed in this area. Finally, a brief discussion of billing for critical care will be discussed.

Organization and Structure of the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit

Oncology ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 709-727
Author(s):  
Michael H. Wall
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Low Intensity

The purpose of this chapter is to emphasize and describe the team nature of critical care medicine in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit. The chapter will review the importance of various team members and discuss various staffing models (open vs closed, high intensity vs low intensity, etc.) on patient outcomes and cost. The chapter will also examine the roles of nurse practitioners and physician assistants (NP/PAs) in critical care, and will briefly review the growing role of the tele-ICU. Most studies support the concept that a multi-disciplinary ICU team, led by an intensivist, improves patient outcomes and decreases overall cost of care. The role of the tele-ICU and 24 hour in-house intensivist staffing in improving outcomes is controversial, and more research is needed in this area. Finally, a brief discussion of billing for critical care will be discussed.

The Trach Trail: A Systems-Based Pathway to Improve Quality of Tracheostomy Care and Interdisciplinary Collaboration

2020 ◽  
Vol 163 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Cherney ◽  
Vinciya Pandian ◽  
Ashly Ninan ◽  
Debra Eastman ◽  
Brian Barnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Interdisciplinary Collaboration ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Staff Nurse ◽  
Prospective Comparison

Objective To implement a standardized tracheostomy pathway that reduces length of stay through tracheostomy education, coordinated care protocols, and tracking patient outcomes. Methods The project design involved retrospective analysis of a baseline state, followed by a multimodal intervention (Trach Trail) and prospective comparison against synchronous controls. Patients undergoing tracheostomy from 2015 to 2016 (n = 60) were analyzed for demographics and outcomes. Trach Trail, a standardized care pathway, was developed with the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice. Trach Trail implementation entailed monthly tracheostomy champion training at 8-hour duration and staff nurse didactics, written materials, and experiential learning. Trach Trail enrollment occurred from 2018 to 2019. Data on demographics, length of stay, and care outcomes were collected from patients in the Trach Trail group (n = 21) and a synchronous tracheostomy control group (n = 117). Results Fifty-five nurses completed Trach Trail training, providing care for 21 patients placed on the Trach Trail and for synchronous control patients with tracheostomy who received routine tracheostomy care. Patients on the Trach Trail and controls had similar demographic characteristics, diagnoses, and indications for tracheostomy. In the Trach Trail group, intensive care unit length of stay was significantly reduced as compared with the control group, decreasing from a mean 21 days to 10 ( P < .05). The incidence of adverse events was unchanged. Discussion Introduction of the Trach Trail was associated with a reduction in length of stay in the intensive care unit. Realizing broader patient-centered improvement likely requires engaging respiratory therapists, speech language pathologists, and social workers to maximize patient/caregiver engagement. Implications for Practice Standardized tracheostomy care with interdisciplinary collaboration may reduce length of stay and improve patient outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document